Cite this article as: Fowewe, S. M. (2025). Pan-Islamic ideology in the works of ĂdamAbdullăh Al-Ilõry: A sociolinguistics perspective. Sokoto Journal of Linguistics and Communication Studies (SOJOLICS), 1(3), 85–91. https://www.doi.org/10.36349/sojolics.2025.v01i03.012
SOCIOLINGUISTIC
INSIGHTS INTO PAN-ISLAMIC THOUGHT IN THE WRITINGS OF ĂDAM ABDULLĂH AL-ILÕRY
By
Shittu Mustapha
Fowewe
shittumf@lasued.edu.ng, shittumustaphafowewe@gmail.com
Foreign Languages
Education, College of Languages and Communication Art Education,
Lagos State
University of Education, Lagos
Abstract
Ădam Abdullāh
Al-Ilõry was a distinguished twentieth-century Nigerian and West African
Islamic scholar whose writings engaged critically with religion, culture, and
society. A central theme in his works is Pan-Islamism, articulated through
deliberate communicative strategies and precise linguistic choices. This study
examines the sociolinguistic dimensions of Al-Ilõry’s Pan-Islamic discourse in
his work Al-Islām fīNaijīriyahwa Shaykh Uthman b. Fûdi, analyzing how he
employs Arabic-Islamic writings as tools for religious instruction, social
reform, and ideological mobilization. Adopting an analytical descriptive
research method, the study addresses key questions: Who is Ădam Abdullāh
Al-Ilõry? What is Pan-Islamism? And how does Al-Ilõry employ sociolinguistic
and communicative techniques to construct identity, transmit ideology, and
unify his audience? The findings reveal that his language is characterized by
clarity, strategic repetition, Qur’ānic allusions, and culturally grounded
expressions that enhance persuasion and reinforce his call for Muslim unity.
The study concludes that Al-Ilõry’s writings reflect a sophisticated
sociolinguistic consciousness, demonstrating how language can function as a
tool of reform and mobilization. It further recommends additional research and
broader scholarly engagement with the intellectual contributions of Yoruba
Muslim scholars.
Keyword: Ădam Abdullāh
Al-Ilõry, Communicative, Islam, Pan-Islamism, Sociolinguistics
1. Introduction
Sociolinguistics
studies how language operates within its social context and how people use it
to express identity, ideology, and power. From this perspective, ĀdamAbdullāh
Al-Ilõry’s writings show that Arabic was not only a tool of religious
instruction but also an instrument of social reform and ideological
mobilization. His sermons and books convey Pan-Islamic ideals through clear
Arabic infused with Yoruba elements and enriched with Qur’ānic references,
consistently urging Muslim unity. A sociolinguistic reading of his work reveals
that his linguistic and stylistic choices aimed not just to teach but to unite,
persuade, and reform the Muslim community.
Using Hymes’s idea
of communicative competence, this study explains how Al-Ilory used Arabic and
Yoruba to reach diverse audiences and advance Pan-Islamic unity. His linguistic
choicesshaped by social and cultural contextserved as tools for education, reform,
and community building in West Africa. Jakobson’s communication model also
helps clarify his role as sender, the Muslim community as receiver, and
Pan-Islamism as the central message delivered through sermons, books, and
lectures. Through this lens, the study analyzes how Al-Ilory’s language builds
identity, resists colonial influence, and drives reform using repetition,
Qur’ānic allusion, metaphor, and other strategies within a multilingual
environment.
This study aims to
investigate Sheikh Ădam Abdullāh Al-Ilõry’sbook named “Al-IslāmfīNaijīriyahwaShaykhUthman
bun Fŭdi “through a sociolinguistic lens, focusing on how language
functions as a medium of ideology, identity, and social reform. It seeks to
analyze how Al-Ilory employs language as a communicative tool for promoting
Pan-Islamic unity, exploring how his bilingual use of Arabic and Yoruba
reflects both audience awareness and cultural inclusivity within a multilingual
society. The study also examines how his communicative strategiessuch as
repetition, Qur’anic allusion, metaphor, and tone serve as instruments of
persuasion, education, and social transformation. Furthermore, it investigates
how Al-Ilory’s linguistic choices embody the interconnection between language,
ideology, and identity, positioning his writings as acts of sociolinguistic
engagement aimed at fostering moral reform and communal solidarity. In pursuit
of these aims, the research will address key questions such as: how Al-Ilory’s
language communicates Pan-Islamic ideology and unity; how his bilingual
expression and rhetorical patterns function in context; what communicative
techniques he uses to persuade and educate; and what broader social,
ideological, and cultural implications his linguistic practices hold for
understanding Islamic reform and identity formation in twentieth-century West
Africa.
2. Literature Review
Scholarly
attention to the intellectual contributions of ĂdamAbdullăh Al-Ilõryhas been
discussed extensively in several theses, monographs, and articles dedicated to
his works. Several studies have been written on Ădam Abdullăh Al-Ilõry, such as
“Al-Shaykh Adam Abdallah al-Iluri fi Mawkib al-Khalidin [Sheikh Adam
Abdallah al-Iluri in the Procession of the Immortals]”, in the year 2012
from University of Ilorin, which entirely study his life and scholarship,
provide a biographical and bibliographical account of his writings and
influence. Arabic-language studies like الداعية
الشيخ آدم الألوري: حياته وآثاره العلميةalso catalogue his
publications and teaching methods, offering insight into his intellectual
framework and his pioneering role in modernizing Arabic education in
Yorubaland. Similarly, journal articles such as The Role of Sheikh Adam
Abdullahi Al-Ilory toward Educating Nigerian People emphasize his impact on
pedagogy and institutional reform, while other works assess his literary and
poetic style, underscoring the breadth of his intellectual contributions.
Recent scholarship
has also approached ĂdamAbdullăh Al-Ilõryworks thematically, focusing on the
social and hermeneutical dimensions of his writings. For instance, toward a
Feminism and Qur’anic Hermeneutics on Gender Equality critically evaluates
his interpretive stance on women and gender, situating him within broader
discourses of Qur’anic exegesis. Other studies, such as Shaykh Adam
Abdullahi Al-Ilori (1917–1992): A Muslim Reformer of 20th Century in Yorubaland,
contextualize his reformist agenda within West African Islam, while
institutional and encyclopedic sources highlight the continuous use of his
textbooks, Tafsir, and poetry in academic research.Collectively, these works
affirm Al-Ilory’s enduring legacy as a reformer, educator, and prolific author
whose books remain central to discussions on Islamic scholarship, education,
and social transformation in Nigeria and beyond.
2.1 AboutĂdamAbdullăh Al-Ilõry
Sheikh
ĂdamAbdullāh Al-Ilõry (1917–1992) was a distinguished West African Islamic
scholar whose intellectual and spiritual influence shaped Islamic education and
reform across Nigeria and the subregion. Born to a devout Yoruba Muslim family,
his father, Abdul-BãqiHabĩbullahAbdullahi, traced his lineage to Oyo-ile and
Ilorin, while his mother, Aisha, descended from the royal family of Wasa in the
present-day Benin Republic. Growing up in a culturally rich and religiously
oriented home, Al-Ilory was introduced early to Qur’ānic recitation and Islamic
learning, which laid the foundation for his lifelong scholarship.
His educational
journey traversed several centers of learning. He initially studied under his
father and later under prominent Nigerian scholars such as Sheikh ṢāliḥEsiniobiwa
in Ibadan and Sheikh Umar Al-Agbaji Al-Ilori in Lagos. Seeking deeper
knowledge, he continued his studies with the Kano-based scholar Sheikh Adam
Namaaji Al-Kanawi, who greatly influenced his mastery of composition and
writing. His quest for scholarship eventually took him to Egypt, where he
benefited from the academic environment of Al-Azhar and received scholarly
endorsement. His travels to Medina and Makkah further enriched his religious
outlook and strengthened his commitment to Islamic reform.
Upon returning to
Nigeria, Sheikh Al-Ilory established the Markaz (Centre for Arabic and Islamic
Training) in Abeokuta in 1952 before relocating it to Agege, Lagos, in 1957.
The Markaz became a major hub for Arabic learning, preaching, publishing, and
fatwa issuance, later expanding into diploma and degree programs. A prolific
writer, Al-Ilory authored numerous influential books included prose and poems,
and founded the Islamic Cultural Press in 1968. His works are widely used
across West Africa and recognized by educational bodies such as WAEC and NECO.
His legacy continues to receive national and international recognition and
remains a central subject of academic research, particularly in studies of
Islamic reform, Arabic literature, and West African Muslim identity.
2.2 Sociolinguistics Framework of Communication
The
sociolinguistics framework of communication emphasizes that language is not
merely a vehicle for conveying information but a social act that expresses
identity, ideology, and communal belonging. It explores how linguistic choices
reflect social contexts and cultural values, enabling speakers to negotiate
meaning and influence their audiences. Dell Hymes’s concept of communicative
competence highlights the importance of using language appropriately within
specific social and cultural environments. This perspective provides a
meaningful approach to understanding Sheikh ĂdamAbdullāh Al-Ilõry’s Pan-Islamic
ideology, which he articulated through different codes (languages) of Arabic
and Yoruba to reach diverse audiences across West Africa. His linguistic flexibility
served as both an educational and ideological tool in uniting Muslims beyond
ethnic divisions and promoting reformist consciousness within the ummah.
Through his works such as Al-IslāmfīNaijīriyahwaShaykhUthman bun FŭdiandNazĩmuşobafiiAkhbãri
l-Islãmuwa ‘ulamãubilãdiyorubaĂdamAbdullăh Al-Ilõry’s communicative style
embodied a sociolinguistic awareness that linked language, religion, and social
reform, aligning with Carbaugh’s view that communication practices are shaped
by cultural norms and social objectives.
Roman Jakobson’s
Model of Communication in Linguistics proposed a foundational model of
communication that included six functions of language, Addresser (sender),
Addressee (receiver) Message, Context, Contact, Code. Jakobson’s approach shows
that writings or verbal expression doesn’t just communicate content but
explores how language communicates, calling attention to its own forms. Also,
Literary exploration refers to the analytical or interpretative study of
literary texts, such as novels, poems, essays, or religious and philosophical
writings, in this context addresser is ĂdamAbdullăh Al-Ilõry, addressee
is Muslim community, message is Pan-Islamism, context is Pan-Islamism
as a response or catalyst to fragmentation and secularism, Contact is the
medium like books, public lectures, and pulpit lecturesand the last one is Code
which means the Language that ĂdamAbdullăh Al-Ilõry used to express his
ideology which is Arabic and Yoruba.
Accordingly, this
research adopts a sociolinguistic approach to examine the communicative
dimensions of Sheikh ĂdamAbdullāh Al-Ilõry’s book‘Al-IslāmfīNaijīriyahwaShaykhUthman
bun Fŭdi’. The study explores how Al-Ilory employs Arabic not
only as linguistic codes but as social instruments through which he conveys
Pan-Islamic ideology, fosters unity, and mobilizes reform. In doing so, it
analyzes how Al-Ilory’s language reflects awareness of his audiencesboth
scholarly and layand how his communicative strategies bridge educational and
ethnic divides. The focus is therefore on how his linguistic practices function
socially to strengthen collective identity, challenge colonial ideologies, and
promote cultural self-determination within the Muslim community.
Specifically, the
study investigates the following sociolinguistic dimensions of Al-Ilory’s
communicative practice:
1.
How communication occurs between speakers and
audiences across contexts such as sermons, books, and public lectures.
2.
How Al-Ilory’s narrative voice,
tone, and code choice (Arabic and Yoruba) reflects sociocultural positioning
and communicative intent.
3.
The social and ideological functions of
language within his reformist message how linguistic structures convey unity,
power, and belief.
4.
The communicative strategies (repetition,
metaphor, Qur’anic reference) used to persuade, instruct, and mobilize
audiences.
5.
The barriers and challenges of
communication in a multilingual and colonial setting, including
misunderstanding, resistance, or ideological distortion.
3. Data Presentation and Interpretation
Pan-Islamism is a
political, cultural, and spiritual ideology advocating for the unity of the
global Muslim community beyond ethnic, linguistic, or territorial divisions. It
gained prominence in the late nineteenth century as Muslim thinkers such as
Jamal al-Din al-Afghani and Muhammad Abduh responded to European colonial
expansion and the weakening of Muslim polities. Their vision sought to revive
the spiritual vitality and political strength of the Islamic world through
solidarity, reform, and resistance. In Al-IslãmufĩNaijĩriyyawá Shaykh Uthman
bùn Fŭdi, ĂdamAbdullăh Al-Ilõry localizes this global Pan-Islamist vision
within the context of Nigeria and West Africa, blending historical narrative,
cultural commentary, and political reflection to situate Nigeria’s Islamic
heritage within the broader Ummah and advocate for renewed unity.
The colonial
conquest of West Africa in the nineteenth and early twentieth centuries
disrupted existing Islamic political systems and severed organic connections
between African Muslims and the wider Islamic world. Prior to this period, the
Sokoto Caliphate (1804–1903) under Sheikh Uthman b. Fodio served as a model of
Islamic governance, combining religious scholarship with political authority.
Globally, the late nineteenth century witnessed Pan-Islamist mobilizations,
including the symbolic leadership of the Ottoman Caliphate, Afghani’s political
calls for unity, and Abduh’s educational and intellectual reforms. ĂdamAbdullăh
Al-Ilõry positions the Sokoto experience alongside these movements,
demonstrating that Pan-Islamism is not foreign to Africa but deeply embedded in
its Islamic history.
He views the
Sokoto Caliphate as both a local and global phenomenon, embodying principles of
Islamic unity, justice, and education. According to Al-Ilõry, several qualities
coalesced in the personality of Ibn Fodio, who established a state governed by
the Book of Allah and the Sunnah of His Messenger, modeled after the earliest
Islamic governments of Islam’s formative period. This historical framing
situates Sokoto within the symbolic lineage of the early Islamic era and
underscores a central Pan-Islamist conviction: that restoring Islamic unity is
not merely an ideal but a continuation of an interrupted historical process.
Al-Ilõry further
highlights the role of Islamic organizations as instruments of cultural and
political defense. In Nigeria, associations such as Ansar al-Deen, Ansar
al-Islam, Izala, the Young Muslim Association, and the Federation of Muslim
Women emerged to protect Muslim identity and promote education. He observes
that, in response to colonial pressures, Muslims established associations
focused on opening Islamic schools, beginning with the Ansar-ud-Deen Society in
1923, followed by the Ansar-ul-Islam Society in 1945, and the Islamic
Congregation (Zumratul-Islamiyya) in 1956, thereby spreading Islamic education
across cities and villages. For Al-Ilõry, the Arabic language functions as
another unifying force, essential not only for worship but also for accessing
Islamic scholarship and engaging in the broader intellectual life of the Ummah.
He rejects the colonial-era reduction of Arabic to a liturgical language,
insisting on its role as a medium of science, law, and culture.
Al-Ilõry employs
the metaphor of the locomotive and the train to describe the relationship
between Arab and non-Arab Muslims, asserting that the Arabs are the locomotive
of Islam while non-Arabs are its train, and that the train cannot move if the
locomotive stops. This analogy emphasizes his belief that the strength of the
Ummah depends on mutual cooperation, challenging both Arab elitism and the
marginalization of African Muslims, and advocating for equality within the
global Islamic community. In this respect, his thought parallels Muhammad
Iqbal’s notion of the “spiritual democracy” of Islam, where cultural diversity
within the Ummah is considered a source of strength.
The contemporary
relevance of Al-Ilõry’s Pan-Islamism is evident in Nigeria and West Africa,
where challenges such as sectarian violence, political instability, and
pressures from globalization mirror the historical issues he identified. His
call for unity through shared history, cultural revival, and organized activism
remains pertinent, particularly in a global context marked by Islamophobia,
neo-colonial economic structures, and geopolitical fragmentation. Al-Ilõry’s
Pan-Islamism offers a framework for African Muslim agency within the global
Ummah, emphasizing historical continuity and rejecting dependency.
Ultimately, Al-IslãmufĩNaijĩriyyawá
Shaykh Uthman bùnFŭdi articulates a Pan-Islamist vision that is deeply
rooted in African Islamic history yet fully engaged with the global revivalist
project. By drawing on the legacy of the Sokoto Caliphate, emphasizing cultural
and religious bonds, and promoting organizational activism, Al-Ilõry situates
Nigeria as an integral part of the Ummah’s future. His metaphor of the
locomotive and train captures the essence of his thought: the Ummah is a
single, interconnected body, and its revival depends on solidarity across all
its parts. For Al-Ilõry, Pan-Islamism is not an imported ideology but an
indigenous imperative, a continuation of a legacy that is both West African and
universal.
Sheikh Ādam
Abdullāh Al-Ilõry’s Al-Islām fĩNaijīriyahwa Shaykh Uthmān b. Fūdi
functions as more than a historical or religious study; it exemplifies
sophisticated sociolinguistic communication. Through deliberate use of Arabic,
frequent Qur’ānic references, and carefully chosen narrative and rhetorical
forms, Al-Ilory employs language as a tool for ideology, identity formation,
and social reform. His linguistic choices demonstrate high sociolinguistic
competence, enabling him to inform, persuade, and mobilize readers toward
Pan-Islamic consciousness. Consequently, the text operates not merely as a
religious treatise but as a layered literary composition that conveys
reformist, ideological, and historical visions through deliberate communicative
strategies.
Al-Ilory’s
historical-narrative approach serves both didactic and identity-constructing
purposes. By tracing the development of Islam in Nigeria from early contact to
religious maturity, he situates readers within a shared historical continuum,
reinforcing collective Muslim identity.
Statements such as“لقدثبتوجودالصلةبينشمالأفريقي
و غربهاقبلظهورالإسلامبمئاتسنين”(“It has been established that there was a
connection between North Africa and West Africa hundreds of years before the
advent of Islam,” p. 25), descriptions of Yorubaland’s geography, and
reflections on the maturation of Islam in local communities exemplify this
strategy. These historical narrations are not mere recitations of fact; they
function as communicative strategies of belonging, emphasizing Africa’s
integral role in Islamic civilization and fostering social cohesion through
shared history. Chronological sequencing thus becomes a sociolinguistic act of
identity formation.
Religious rhetoric
in Al-Ilory’s text further illustrates language as a tool of social persuasion.
Qur’ānic allusions and direct addresses position him as both educator and
reformer, appealing to conscience and moral responsibility. For example, his
metaphor“العربقاطرةالإسلاموالعجمحافلتهولايمكنأنتتحركالحافلةإذاسكنتالقاطرة”(“The Arabs are
the locomotive of Islam and the non-Arabs are its train; the train cannot move
if the locomotive comes to a halt,” p. 248) conveys the necessity of mutual
cooperation within the Ummah. In other passages, such as admonitions to rulers
and scholars against injustice and hypocrisy, Al-Ilory employs repetition,
emotional appeal, and Qur’ānic references to establish moral hierarchies and
guide behavior. These strategies are sociolinguistic performances that
construct a moral community and reinforce Pan-Islamic ideology.
Binary oppositions
between truth and falsehood, justice and corruption, are another communicative
strategy that frames ideological discourse. Statements like“وقدبلغنيمنأحدكمأنهيذكرلهالحكمالشرعي،
ولابدأنيستيقظمنالسنة، ويحولبينهوبينالباطل، ويحصنه، ويقيمهعلىالحق”(“It has reached
me that one of you, when the Sharia ruling is mentioned to him, he must awaken
from heedlessness, block the way to falsehood, protect himself, and establish
himself upon the truth,” p. 122) linguistically encode moral polarity. Such contrasts
define social boundaries, constructing a discursive identity in which alignment
with the “truth” signifies belonging to the Muslim community, while deviation
signals moral and social estrangement. These oppositions operate as both
rhetorical devices and sociolinguistic acts sustaining the ideological unity of
the audience.
Symbolic
characterization also plays a crucial role in Al-Ilory’s communicative
strategy. Historical figures such as Uthman b. Fūdī are presented as linguistic
and moral archetypes, embodying leadership grounded in independence and faith.
Passages contrasting Ibn Fūdī with figures like Ibn Yasin and Ibn Abd al-Wahhab
illustrate differing approaches to leadership, emphasizing autonomy and
integrity as core Islamic reformist values. This symbolic use of historical
personalities transforms them into communicative models for moral and political
emulation, linking sociolinguistic expression with ideological and educational
purposes.
Cultural critique
further enriches the text’s sociolinguistic dimension. Al-Ilory critiques
Westernization, secularism, and moral decline, contrasting European rulers’
infidelity with the dedication of African Muslim communities in Hausa, Ghana,
and Mali
(“وإنماضعفشأنالإسلامفىبلاديوربالكونملوكهاوأمرائهاكفاراً، ولعدمظهوربطليجمعبينالدعوةوالجهادفيسبيلالإسلام،
كمافيبلادهوساوغاناومالي”, p. 51). This language indexes communal values,
asserting Islamic authenticity while resisting cultural and colonial
domination. His combination of lamentation and exhortation demonstrates the
performative power of religious language to inspire reform, mobilize action,
and reconstruct social values.
The pedagogical
structure of the book mirrors classical instructional texts, progressing from
basic geographic and demographic context to historical development,
biographical and thematic analyses of Uthman b. Fūdī, and concluding with
critiques of contemporary challenges and calls for reform. This organization
enhances comprehension, reflection, and practical application, making the text
accessible to both student readers and reform-minded scholars while reinforcing
its communicative and sociolinguistic impact.
4. Discussion
This study has
examined ĂdamAbdullāh Al-Ilõry’s Al-Islām fĩNaijīriyahwa Shaykh Uthman bun
Fūdī through a sociolinguistic lens, revealing how language operates as a
social and ideological instrument in his articulation of Pan-Islamic vision.
Drawing on Dell Hymes’s concept of communicative competence, the analysis
demonstrates that Al-Ilory’s mastery of Arabic and Yoruba reflects a
sophisticated awareness of audience, purpose, and context. His bilingual
expression shows that communication extends beyond the linguistic level to
function as a social act aimed at unity, reform, and cultural revival. By selecting
linguistic codes appropriate for diverse audiences, Al-Ilory transforms
language into a medium of social inclusion and religious education,
exemplifying Hymes’s view that communicative effectiveness depends on cultural
and situational awareness.
From the
perspective of language, ideology, and identity, Al-Ilory’s Pan-Islamic
writings employ rhetorical strategies such as repetition, metaphor, and
Qur’ānic allusion to cultivate a collective consciousness among Muslims in West
Africa. Following Wardhaugh and Fuller’s (2015) conceptualization of language
as social behavior, his use of these devices reflects deliberate ideological
functions: promoting solidarity, resisting colonial narratives, and
legitimizing Islamic authority. The metaphor of “the locomotive and the train,”
for instance, embodies unity and interdependence within the Muslim Ummah,
illustrating how linguistic imagery conveys social meaning. Similarly, his
consistent contrasts between truth and falsehood or reform and decay index
moral values, reinforcing communal identity and reformist thought within the
broader sociocultural framework of Islam.
Al-Ilory’s
linguistic choices also illuminate the politics of code selection and the
sociolinguistic dynamics of reform. By integrating Yoruba into Arabic texts, he
challenges linguistic hierarchies and asserts cultural autonomy for African
Muslims, aligning with Carbaugh’s (2019) perspective that communication
reflects cultural norms and social objectives. His clear, repetitive, and
pedagogically oriented style ensures accessibility across educational levels,
transforming his work into an instrument of social transformation.
Consequently, a sociolinguistic reading of Al-Ilory’s writings shows that
language in his hands is not merely a vehicle for expression but a force of
ideological and social change, bridging religion, identity, and reform to
foster a unified and reform-minded Muslim community in Africa.
5. Conclusion
This study has
shown that Ădam Abdullăh Al-Ilõry’s Al-Islām fĩNaijīriyahwa Shaykh Uthman
bun Fūdī is not merely a historical or religious text but a sophisticated
work of sociolinguistic communication that advances a Pan-Islamic vision.
Through his deliberate use of Arabic and Yoruba, Qur’ānic references,
rhetorical devices, and symbolic characterization, Al-Ilory conveys ideology,
constructs a collective Muslim identity, and promotes social reform. His
historical narratives, moral exhortations, and cultural critiques situate
Nigeria and West Africa within the broader Islamic world, highlighting both
local heritage and global Muslim unity. By bridging scholarly and lay
audiences, challenging linguistic hierarchies, and advocating for educational
and organizational activism, he transforms language into a powerful instrument
for social cohesion, religious revival, and communal solidarity. His metaphor
of “the locomotive and the train” encapsulates the interdependence of the
Ummah, demonstrating that the strength of the Muslim community relies on
cooperation among its diverse members. Al-Ilory’s writings illustrate that
language is not merely a medium of expression but a vehicle for education,
persuasion, and ideological mobilization, establishing him as a reformist
scholar whose legacy remains significant. His works provide a model for
employing literary and linguistic strategies to preserve Islamic identity,
foster unity, and inspire reform in West Africa, while future studies on Yoruba
and other African Muslim scholars will further illuminate how language and
literature sustain Pan-Islamic ideals across cultural and social contexts.
References
Al-Ilory,
A. A. (1985). Al-‘Īd al-Arba‘ūn min Ta’sīs al-Markaz. Islamic Cultural
Centre.
Al-Ilory,
A. A. (2014). Al-Islam fi Naijiriyyawa Shaykh Uthman bin Fŭdi (p. 134).
Maktabat al-Iskandariyyah.
Bunza,
M. U. (2002). Islamism vs. secularism: A religious-political struggle in modern
Nigeria. Journal for the Study of Religions and Ideologies, 2, 49–65.
Carbaugh,
D. (2019). Ethnography of communication (pp. 1–10). https://www.researchgate.net/publication/33675167_Ethnography_of_Communication
Gambo,
H., & Bello, S. M. (2019). The role of Sheikh Adam Abdullahi Al-Ilory
toward educating Nigerian people. International Journal of Research and
Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), 3(6), 324–330. https://rsisinternational.org/journals/ijriss/Digital-Library/volume-3-issue-9/110-113.pdf
Hymes,
D. (2020). The scope of sociolinguistics. International Journal of the
Sociology of Language, 263, 67–76. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/341733115_The_Scope_of_Sociolinguistics
Ibrahim,
A.-L. O. (2012). The contributions of Sheikh Adam Abdullah Al-Ilory to the
development of Arabic poetry in Nigeria. In Sheikh Adam Abdullah Al-Ilory in
the Procession of the Immortals (Vol. 1, pp. 389–419).
Mahdi,
S. (2004, July). Al-Da‘iyyah al-Shaykh Adam al-Iluri: Hayatuhuwa-Atharuhu
al-‘Ilmiyyah [The preacher Sheikh Adam al-Iluri: His life and scholarly
contributions]. MajallatDirasatDa‘wiyyah [Journal of Da‘wah Studies], 8,
174–200. https://dawa.center/file/4142
Markaz
Arabic and Islamic Training Centre. (2025, September 17). Markaz Agege.
Markaz-Uni.edu.ng. https://markaz-uni.edu.ng/
Merriam-Webster.
(2025, September 17). Islamism. In Merriam-Webster.com dictionary. https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/Islamism
Merriam-Webster.
(2025, September 17). Pan. In Merriam-Webster.com dictionary. https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/pan
Nurudeen,
I. (2022). Sheikh Adam Abdullahi El-Ilory: A legendary scholar and iconic
historian (pp. 3–6). Lagos: Irfan Centre.
Oniyide,
D. A. (2022). Toward a feminism and Qur’anic hermeneutics on gender equality: A
study of Shaykh Adam Abdullah Al-Ilory’s works. Sri Lankan Journal of Arabic
and Islamic Studies, 5(1), 85–100. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/362325941_TOWARD_A_FEMINISM_AND_QURANIC_HERMENEUTICS_ON_GENDER_EQUALITY_A_STUDY_OF_SHAYKH_ADAM_ABDULLAH_AL-ILORY%27S_WORKS
Osterhammel,
J. (2014). The transformation of the world: A global history of the
nineteenth century. Princeton University Press.
Popai.
(2025, September 18). Understanding literary analysis: Themes, symbols,
techniques, and examples. https://www.popai.pro/resources/understanding-literary-analysis-themes-symbols-techniques-and-examples/
Reichmuth,
S. (2013). Islamic scholarship in Africa: New directions and global contexts.
James Currey.
Wardhaugh,
R., & Fuller, J. M. (2015). An introduction to sociolinguistics (7th
ed., pp. 1–5). Wiley-Blackwell. https://mrdowoportal.weebly.com/uploads/1/0/1/8/10183165/wardhaugh-fuller2015-an_introduction_to_sociolinguistics.pdf
Wikipedia.
(2025, September 18). Jakobson’s functions of language. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jakobson%27s_functions_of_language
0 Comments