Ad Code

Assessing the Effectiveness of Nigeria’s Data Protection Act in Safeguarding Users’ Privacy on Social Media Platforms

Cite this article as: Yusuf, I. S., Yakubu, S. M., & Aminu, J. (2026). Assessing the Effectiveness of Nigeria's Data Protection Act in Safeguarding Users' Privacy on Social Media Platforms. Sokoto Journal of Linguistics and Communication Studies (SOJOLICS), 2(1), xx-xx. https://doi.org/10.36349/sojolics.2026.v02i01.050

By

Isah Sani Yusuf
Department of Mass Communication,
Nasarawa State University, Keffi
isahsaniy@nsuk.edu.ng
08030697062

&

Salisu Mohammed Yakubu
Department of Mass Communication,
Nasarawa State University, Keffi
yakubumohsal@gmail.com

&

Jamila Aminu
Department of Mass Communication,
Nasarawa State University, Keffi
jamilaaminu@nsuk.edu.ng

Abstract

The Nigeria Data Protection Act (NDPA) 2023 was enacted to strengthen personal data protection and digital privacy in Nigeria. However, empirical evidence on social media users' awareness of the Act and their perceptions of its effectiveness remains limited, particularly in North Central Nigeria. This study examined users' awareness of the NDPA and their perceptions of its effectiveness in safeguarding privacy on social media platforms. A survey research design was adopted, and structured questionnaires were administered to 200 purposively selected social media users across Abuja (FCT), Benue, Kogi, Kwara, Nasarawa, Niger, and Plateau States. A total of 186 questionnaires were retrieved, representing a 93% response rate, and analysed using descriptive statistics. The findings revealed that although 62% of respondents were aware of digital privacy concerns, only 41% were familiar with the NDPA. While 74% believed that social media platforms collect excessive personal information, only 48% perceived that the Act had moderately improved users' privacy protection. Weak enforcement, low public awareness, organisational non-compliance, and technological limitations were identified as major implementation challenges. The study recommends stronger regulatory enforcement, increased public awareness, enhanced digital literacy, and improved organisational compliance to strengthen data protection in Nigeria.

Keywords: NDPA, Data Protection, Social Media, Privacy, Digital Governance, North Central Nigeria

1.0 Introduction

The rapid advancement of digital communication technologies has transformed communication, commerce, education, governance, and information dissemination worldwide. In Nigeria, social media platforms such as Facebook, WhatsApp, Instagram, TikTok, YouTube, and X (formerly Twitter) have become indispensable channels for interpersonal communication, business transactions, political participation, and information exchange, particularly among young people and students. In North Central Nigeria, increased smartphone penetration, improved internet accessibility, and expanding digital infrastructure have accelerated the adoption of these platforms in urban centres such as Abuja, Jos, Ilorin, Lokoja, Lafia, Minna, and Makurdi. Consequently, social media have become central to everyday social and economic activities, creating new opportunities for communication, networking, and civic engagement (Xie et al., 2025).

While these technological developments have enhanced connectivity and access to information, they have also intensified concerns regarding the privacy and security of users' personal information. Social media platforms routinely collect, process, store, and share large volumes of personal and behavioural data for service delivery, targeted advertising, and content personalisation. Such practices have increased users' exposure to cyberstalking, phishing, identity theft, data breaches, cyberbullying, digital surveillance, and other forms of unauthorised data processing. Effoduh and Odeh (2024) argue that Nigeria's expanding digital ecosystem has exposed citizens to significant privacy risks arising from weak institutional safeguards, inadequate regulatory enforcement, and limited digital literacy. Similarly, Cheng and Guo (2025) contend that the extensive collection of users' behavioural data often occurs without meaningful informed consent, thereby increasing the risks of profiling, surveillance, and misuse of personal information.

Growing public concern over these risks has reinforced the need for effective legal and institutional mechanisms to regulate the processing of personal data. Böyük (2025) observes that although social media companies provide privacy policies and user consent mechanisms, these documents are frequently lengthy, technical, and difficult for ordinary users to understand, thereby limiting informed decision-making. Likewise, Peter and Ndinojuo (2024) report that although Nigerian social media users increasingly recognise the importance of protecting their personal information, many remain unfamiliar with the institutions and legal mechanisms responsible for safeguarding their privacy rights.

Nigeria's first comprehensive attempt to regulate the processing of personal data was the introduction of the Nigeria Data Protection Regulation (NDPR) in 2019. The regulation established principles relating to lawful processing, informed consent, confidentiality, and organisational accountability. However, its implementation was constrained by limited institutional authority, weak enforcement mechanisms, poor organisational compliance, and inadequate public awareness. To address these limitations, the Nigeria Data Protection Act (NDPA) 2023 was enacted, establishing the Nigeria Data Protection Commission (NDPC) as the statutory authority responsible for regulating data processing activities and enforcing compliance with data protection obligations. The Act provides legal safeguards relating to informed consent, access to personal data, correction of inaccurate information, data portability, and protection against unlawful disclosure or misuse of personal information. According to Adeoye (2025), the enactment of the NDPA represents an important milestone in aligning Nigeria's data protection regime with international standards, including the European Union's General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR). Similarly, Ramadan, Risnain, and Nugraha (2025) emphasise that effective data protection legislation is fundamental to promoting trust, accountability, and privacy within contemporary digital environments.

Despite these legislative developments, concerns regarding online privacy violations and cyber insecurity remain widespread in Nigeria. Reports of phishing attacks, identity theft, fake social media accounts, cyber fraud, and unauthorised disclosure of personal information continue to raise questions about the extent to which the NDPA has translated into improved privacy protection in practice. These concerns are particularly relevant in North Central Nigeria, where disparities in digital literacy, technological infrastructure, and public awareness may influence users' understanding of data protection rights and their perceptions of the effectiveness of existing regulatory measures.

Although previous studies have examined data protection, digital privacy, and cybersecurity in Nigeria, much of the existing literature has focused on legal analyses, policy discussions, or general privacy concerns, with limited empirical attention given to social media users' awareness of the NDPA and their perceptions of its effectiveness, particularly within North Central Nigeria. Consequently, there remains insufficient empirical evidence regarding the extent to which users understand the provisions of the Act, perceive its effectiveness in protecting their personal information, and identify the practical challenges affecting its implementation.

It is against this background that this study investigates social media users' awareness of the Nigeria Data Protection Act (NDPA) 2023 and examines their perceptions of its effectiveness in safeguarding personal privacy on social media platforms in North Central Nigeria. The findings are expected to contribute to ongoing discussions on digital governance and provide evidence to support policy measures aimed at strengthening data protection and privacy in Nigeria.

2.0 Literature Review

Data protection has become a fundamental component of digital governance as governments and organisations increasingly rely on information technologies to collect, process, store, and transfer personal data. It encompasses the legal, institutional, and technological measures designed to ensure that personal information is processed lawfully, securely, and transparently while safeguarding individuals' privacy rights. According to Anigbogu (2025), effective data protection legislation promotes organisational accountability, protects citizens against the misuse of personal information, and strengthens public confidence in digital services. Similarly, robust data governance frameworks provide the legal basis for balancing technological innovation with the protection of individual privacy rights.

The rapid expansion of social media platforms, including Facebook, WhatsApp, Instagram, TikTok, YouTube, and X (formerly Twitter), has transformed communication, commerce, education, and political participation in Nigeria. However, this digital transformation has also increased users' exposure to privacy risks arising from the extensive collection and processing of personal information by social media companies. Effoduh and Odeh (2024) observe that many Nigerian internet users disclose personal information online without fully appreciating the implications of digital surveillance, behavioural profiling, and data exploitation. Similarly, Cheng and Guo (2025) argue that the large-scale collection of users' behavioural data has increased concerns regarding informed consent, transparency, and the commercial use of personal information. Together, these studies suggest that while social media platforms have expanded opportunities for digital participation, they have simultaneously heightened concerns about privacy protection and data security.

Nigeria's initial regulatory response to these concerns was the introduction of the Nigeria Data Protection Regulation (NDPR) in 2019. Chiamogu and Chiamogu (2025) explain that the NDPR sought to align Nigeria's data governance framework with international standards, particularly the European Union's General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), by establishing principles governing lawful processing, informed consent, confidentiality, and data security. Despite these objectives, several scholars agree that the regulation achieved only limited success because it lacked adequate institutional authority and effective enforcement mechanisms. Consequently, weak regulatory oversight and poor organisational compliance limited its practical impact on protecting users' personal information.

To strengthen the country's legal framework, the Nigeria Data Protection Act (NDPA) 2023 established the Nigeria Data Protection Commission (NDPC) as the statutory body responsible for regulating data processing activities and enforcing compliance with data protection obligations. Adeoye (2025) argues that the Act represents a significant improvement over the NDPR by introducing clearer provisions relating to informed consent, accountability, transparency, data subject rights, and the responsibilities of data controllers and processors. These reforms demonstrate Nigeria's commitment to strengthening digital governance and aligning its legal framework with international best practices. However, the existence of a comprehensive legal framework does not necessarily guarantee effective implementation or improved privacy protection in practice.

Empirical studies examining public awareness of data protection in Nigeria present relatively consistent findings. Peter and Ndinojuo (2024) report that Nigerian social media users are increasingly concerned about excessive data collection, cyber fraud, and unauthorised use of personal information. Likewise, Onatuyeh, Oghorodi, Okpako, and Ojei (2025) attribute the growing concern about digital privacy to the increasing prevalence of cybercrime and online fraud. Nevertheless, Asere, Adenomon, and Aimufua (2025) argue that although awareness of digital privacy risks has improved, knowledge of the specific provisions, rights, and protections contained in the NDPA remains relatively low. These findings collectively suggest that general awareness of online privacy does not necessarily translate into adequate understanding of the legal mechanisms available for protecting personal data.

Scholarly opinion diverges more noticeably regarding the effectiveness of the NDPA. On one hand, Adeoye (2025) contends that the Act has strengthened Nigeria's legal framework by enhancing institutional accountability, promoting transparency in data processing, and expanding the legal rights of data subjects. On the other hand, Ugbedeojo (2025) argues that weak enforcement mechanisms, inadequate institutional capacity, and poor compliance among public and private organisations continue to undermine the practical effectiveness of the legislation. Similarly, Alakitan and Makinde (2025) maintain that inadequate ethical governance and weak institutional monitoring reduce the ability of the Act to protect users from unlawful surveillance and digital exploitation. Supporting this position, Osimen and Wonosikou (2025) argue that effective data protection depends not only on comprehensive legislation but also on strong regulatory institutions, independent oversight, and consistent enforcement. The contrasting positions presented by these scholars indicate that while the NDPA provides a stronger legal framework, questions remain regarding its practical implementation and effectiveness.

Beyond legal and institutional issues, the literature identifies several operational challenges affecting the implementation of the NDPA. Ugbedeojo (2025) highlights inadequate funding, limited technological infrastructure, shortages of skilled personnel, and weak regulatory capacity as major barriers to effective implementation. Similarly, Asere et al. (2025) identify low public awareness and inadequate digital literacy as significant factors that continue to expose many Nigerians to online privacy risks. These challenges are particularly pronounced in semi-urban and rural communities where access to digital infrastructure and cybersecurity awareness programmes remains limited. Nata'ala (2025) further observes that the increasing sophistication of cyber threats, including phishing attacks, malware, identity theft, and fake social media accounts, has intensified the need for stronger institutional capacity and more effective implementation of data protection laws. Collectively, these studies demonstrate that legal reforms alone cannot adequately protect users' privacy without corresponding improvements in institutional capacity, technological infrastructure, public awareness, and organisational compliance.

Although the existing literature provides valuable insights into Nigeria's evolving data protection regime, several limitations remain. Much of the available research focuses on legal analyses of the NDPA, policy discussions, or broader issues of cybersecurity and digital governance. Comparatively fewer empirical studies have examined social media users' awareness of the NDPA, their perceptions of its effectiveness, and the practical implementation challenges experienced within specific geopolitical regions of Nigeria. Furthermore, limited empirical attention has been given to North Central Nigeria, where variations in digital literacy, technological infrastructure, and public awareness may influence users' experiences and perceptions of data protection. This gap provides the justification for the present study, which investigates social media users' awareness of the NDPA, examines their perceptions of its effectiveness in protecting personal privacy, and identifies the major challenges affecting its implementation within North Central Nigeria.

3.0 Theoretical Framework

This study is anchored on the Communication Privacy Management (CPM) Theory, developed by Sandra Petronio (1991; 2002). The theory explains how individuals manage personal information by establishing privacy boundaries and making decisions about what information to disclose, to whom, and under what conditions. Originally developed to explain privacy management in interpersonal communication, CPM has been widely applied to studies of digital communication and online privacy because it provides a useful framework for understanding how individuals negotiate privacy in technology-mediated environments, including social media platforms.

Communication Privacy Management Theory is founded on several interrelated principles, namely privacy ownership, privacy control, and privacy boundaries. The theory assumes that individuals perceive personal information as something they own and, therefore, believe they have the right to determine how that information is collected, shared, processed, and used. When individuals disclose personal information to others, the recipients become co-owners of that information and are expected to adhere to mutually understood privacy rules governing its use. Effective privacy management therefore depends on the establishment and maintenance of clear privacy boundaries.

A central concept of the theory is boundary coordination, which refers to situations where co-owners of personal information respect agreed privacy rules. Conversely, boundary turbulence occurs when these rules are violated through unauthorised disclosure, misuse, or access to personal information. Within digital environments, boundary turbulence may manifest through data breaches, phishing attacks, identity theft, cyberstalking, unauthorised data sharing, or other forms of privacy violations that undermine users' trust and confidence in digital platforms.

The theory further posits that individuals continuously negotiate privacy boundaries based on factors such as trust, perceived risk, motivation, culture, and context. In social media environments, users routinely make decisions about the amount and type of personal information they disclose while relying on platform providers to process such information responsibly. However, because users often have limited knowledge of complex data processing practices and privacy policies, they may be unable to exercise complete control over their personal information, thereby increasing their vulnerability to privacy breaches.

Communication Privacy Management Theory provides an appropriate framework for this study because the principles underpinning the Nigeria Data Protection Act (NDPA) 2023 closely align with the theory's assumptions regarding privacy ownership and information control. The NDPA seeks to safeguard individuals' personal information by establishing legal requirements relating to informed consent, lawful processing, transparency, accountability, data security, and the rights of data subjects. These legal protections are intended to strengthen users' ability to control how their personal information is collected and processed while holding data controllers and processors accountable for compliance with established privacy rules.

More importantly, the theory provides a conceptual basis for understanding the study variables. The first objective, which examines users' awareness of the NDPA, relates to the extent to which individuals understand their privacy rights and the legal mechanisms available for protecting their personal information. The second objective, which investigates users' perceptions of the effectiveness of the NDPA, reflects the degree to which respondents believe existing legal and institutional arrangements support effective privacy boundary coordination and reduce incidents of boundary turbulence. The third objective, which identifies challenges affecting the implementation of the Act, corresponds with the institutional and technological factors that may prevent individuals from exercising effective control over their personal information despite the existence of legal safeguards.

Although CPM Theory provides valuable insights into privacy management, it has certain limitations when applied to contemporary digital environments. The theory was originally developed within the context of interpersonal communication and therefore gives limited attention to emerging issues such as artificial intelligence, algorithmic profiling, automated decision-making, large-scale data analytics, and the commercial exploitation of personal data by digital platforms. Furthermore, the theory assumes that individuals possess substantial control over their personal information, whereas social media users often have limited knowledge of data processing practices and limited bargaining power over the collection, sharing, and monetisation of their personal data. In developing countries such as Nigeria, these limitations may be further compounded by inadequate digital literacy, weak institutional enforcement, and technological constraints. The theory also provides limited explanation of the role played by regulatory institutions, such as the Nigeria Data Protection Commission (NDPC), in ensuring compliance with data protection legislation.

Despite these limitations, Communication Privacy Management Theory remains the most appropriate theoretical framework for this study because it explains how individuals perceive, manage, and protect their personal information within digital environments. Its emphasis on privacy ownership, information control, and boundary management provides a sound conceptual foundation for examining social media users' awareness of the Nigeria Data Protection Act (NDPA) 2023, their perceptions of its effectiveness in protecting personal privacy, and the challenges affecting its implementation in North Central Nigeria.

4.0 Methodology

This study adopted a survey research design to examine social media users' awareness of the Nigeria Data Protection Act (NDPA) 2023 and their perceptions of its effectiveness in safeguarding personal privacy in North Central Nigeria. The target population comprised active social media users in selected universities and urban centres across Abuja (FCT), Benue, Kogi, Kwara, Nasarawa, Niger, and Plateau States. Using purposive sampling, 200 respondents were selected based on their active use of platforms such as Facebook, WhatsApp, Instagram, TikTok, and X (formerly Twitter). Data were collected through a structured questionnaire containing close-ended items on awareness of the NDPA, privacy experiences, and perceptions of the Act's effectiveness. Of the 200 questionnaires administered, 186 were retrieved and analysed, representing a 93% response rate. Data were analysed using descriptive statistics, including frequency counts and percentages.

5.0 Data Presentation and Analysis

A total of 200 questionnaires were distributed to respondents across selected urban and semi-urban centres in North Central Nigeria. Out of these, 186 questionnaires were successfully retrieved and analysed, representing a response rate of 93%. The data collected were analysed using frequency counts and percentages in line with the objectives of the study.

To Examine Users’ Awareness of Nigeria’s Data Protection Act (NDPA)

Table 1: Respondents’ Awareness of Data Privacy and the NDPA 2023

Variables

Frequency (N=186)

Percentage (%)

Respondents aware of general data privacy concerns

115

62%

Respondents familiar with the provisions of the NDPA 2023

76

41%

Respondents not familiar with the NDPA 2023

110

59%

Respondents actively using more than three social media platforms daily

132

71%

Table 1 reveals that 62% of the respondents were aware of general data privacy concerns within Nigeria’s digital environment. However, only 41% indicated familiarity with the specific provisions of the Nigeria Data Protection Act (NDPA) 2023, while 59% lacked adequate knowledge of the Act. The findings suggest that although awareness regarding online privacy risks is gradually increasing, detailed understanding of Nigeria’s legal data protection framework remains relatively low among social media users in North Central Nigeria. The table also shows that 71% of respondents actively use more than three social media platforms daily, indicating high exposure to digital communication environments where privacy risks are prevalent.

To Assess the Effectiveness of the NDPA in Safeguarding Users’ Privacy on Social Media Platforms

Table 2: Respondents’ Perception of Privacy Protection on Social Media Platforms

Variables

Frequency (N=186)

Percentage (%)

Respondents who believe social media platforms collect excessive personal information

138

74%

Respondents concerned about unauthorised sharing of personal information

126

68%

Respondents who experienced suspicious online activities such as phishing or data breaches

110

59%

Respondents who believe the NDPA has moderately improved digital privacy protection

89

48%

Table 2 indicates that 74% of respondents believed that social media platforms collect excessive personal information without adequate transparency or informed consent. Additionally, 68% expressed concerns regarding the unauthorised sharing of personal information with third parties. The findings further reveal that 59% of respondents had experienced suspicious online activities such as phishing attempts, fake account impersonation, or attempted data breaches. Although 48% believed that the NDPA has moderately improved digital privacy protection, the overall findings suggest that many users still perceive significant vulnerabilities within Nigeria’s digital environment. This implies that the effectiveness of the NDPA in safeguarding users’ privacy remains limited by practical implementation challenges.

To Identify Challenges Affecting the Implementation of Nigeria’s Data Protection Policy

Table 3: Challenges Affecting the Implementation of the NDPA 2023

Variables

Frequency (N=186)

Percentage (%)

Weak enforcement mechanisms

134

72%

Low public awareness

123

66%

Poor organisational compliance

113

61%

Technological and infrastructural limitations

108

58%

Table 3 reveals that 72% of respondents identified weak enforcement mechanisms as the major challenge affecting the implementation of Nigeria’s data protection policy. Furthermore, 66% cited low public awareness and inadequate sensitisation regarding privacy rights as significant barriers. Similarly, 61% identified poor organisational compliance with data protection regulations, while 58% pointed to technological and infrastructural limitations as factors undermining effective implementation of the NDPA. The findings demonstrate that despite the existence of legal provisions for data protection, institutional weaknesses, inadequate awareness, and infrastructural deficiencies continue to hinder effective privacy protection on social media platforms in Nigeria, particularly within North Central Nigeria.

6.0 Discussion of Findings

The discussion of findings is presented in relation to the study objectives, relevant empirical literature, and the Communication Privacy Management (CPM) Theory, which provided the theoretical foundation for the study.

Findings relating to the first objective revealed that although awareness of digital privacy concerns among Nigerian social media users has increased, familiarity with the specific provisions of the Nigeria Data Protection Act (NDPA) 2023 remains relatively low. While many respondents indicated awareness of online privacy risks such as phishing, cyber fraud, and unauthorised access to personal information, only a smaller proportion demonstrated adequate knowledge of the legal protections and rights provided under the NDPA. This finding corroborates Asere, Adenomon, and Aimufua (2025), who argue that inadequate public sensitisation and low digital literacy continue to undermine the implementation of data protection policies in Nigeria. Similarly, Peter and Ndinojuo (2024) found that although Nigerian social media users are increasingly aware of privacy concerns, many remain uncertain about the legal and institutional mechanisms available for protecting their personal data.

From the perspective of Communication Privacy Management Theory, this finding suggests that although users recognise the importance of protecting their personal information, limited awareness of the NDPA restricts their ability to exercise the privacy rights guaranteed under the law. The theory posits that effective privacy management depends on individuals' ability to establish and regulate privacy boundaries. Consequently, inadequate knowledge of existing legal protections may weaken users' capacity to make informed decisions regarding the disclosure and management of their personal information.

Regarding the second objective, respondents generally perceived that social media platforms collect excessive personal information without adequate transparency or informed consent. Many also expressed concerns about unauthorised sharing of personal data and reported experiences involving phishing attempts, fake account impersonation, and other suspicious online activities. These findings support the observations of Effoduh and Odeh (2024), who argue that weaknesses in Nigeria's digital governance framework expose users to surveillance, exploitation, and misuse of personal information. Similarly, Adeoye (2025) maintains that although the NDPA strengthened the legal framework for data protection, concerns about organisational accountability and unauthorised data processing remain prevalent.

The findings further indicate that respondents perceived the NDPA as having only moderately improved the protection of users' privacy on social media platforms. This suggests that the existence of comprehensive legislation alone may not be sufficient to enhance public confidence unless supported by effective implementation and regulatory enforcement. This interpretation is consistent with Alakitan and Makinde (2025), who argue that the effectiveness of data protection legislation depends not only on legal provisions but also on ethical governance, institutional accountability, and compliance by organisations. Within the context of CPM Theory, these findings reflect Petronio's concept of boundary turbulence, whereby users' privacy expectations are undermined through unauthorised disclosure, excessive data collection, and other forms of privacy violation.

With respect to the third objective, respondents identified weak institutional enforcement, low public awareness, organisational non-compliance, and technological limitations as the principal challenges affecting the implementation of the NDPA. These findings are consistent with Ugbedeojo (2025), who identified inadequate regulatory capacity, weak compliance culture, and institutional limitations as major barriers to effective data protection in Nigeria. Likewise, Osimen and Wonosikou (2025) argue that strong regulatory oversight and institutional capacity are essential for safeguarding citizens' digital rights. The responses obtained in this study suggest that these challenges remain particularly significant in North Central Nigeria, where disparities in digital literacy and technological infrastructure may influence users' experiences and perceptions of privacy protection.

From the standpoint of Communication Privacy Management Theory, these findings demonstrate that effective privacy management requires both individual awareness and supportive institutional mechanisms capable of protecting users' privacy boundaries. Although the NDPA provides legal safeguards for personal data, respondents' perceptions indicate that weaknesses in enforcement, public awareness, and organisational compliance continue to limit confidence in its practical implementation.

Overall, the findings suggest that while the NDPA 2023 provides an important legal framework for protecting personal data in Nigeria, respondents perceive that its implementation remains constrained by institutional, technological, and awareness-related challenges. The study therefore underscores the need for stronger regulatory enforcement, sustained public sensitisation, improved organisational compliance, and enhanced cybersecurity capacity to strengthen the protection of users' privacy on social media platforms, particularly in North Central Nigeria.

7.0 Conclusion

This study examined social media users' awareness of the Nigeria Data Protection Act (NDPA) 2023 and their perceptions of its effectiveness in safeguarding personal privacy on social media platforms in North Central Nigeria. The findings indicate that although awareness of digital privacy concerns is relatively high, knowledge of the specific provisions of the NDPA remains limited among many users. Respondents also perceived that weak regulatory enforcement, low public awareness, poor organisational compliance, and technological limitations continue to hinder the effective implementation of the Act. These findings suggest that while the NDPA 2023 provides an important legal and institutional framework for protecting personal data in Nigeria, its perceived effectiveness depends largely on stronger institutional enforcement, sustained public sensitisation, improved organisational accountability, enhanced cybersecurity infrastructure, and expanded digital literacy initiatives. Strengthening these areas will be essential to improving public confidence in Nigeria's data protection framework and enhancing the privacy of social media users.

References

Adeoye, B. (2025). The legal framework for the protection of users’ data on social media in Nigeria. SSRN. https://papers.ssrn.com/

Alakitan, M., & Makinde, E. (2025). Where are the ethical guidelines? Examining the governance of digital technologies and AI in Nigeria. Policy & Internet. https://doi.org/10.1002/poi3.416

Anigbogu, O. (2025). Appraisal of the legal framework on data protection in Nigeria and its implication for right to privacy. SSRN. https://papers.ssrn.com/

Asere, G. F., Adenomon, M. O., &Aimufua, G. I. O. (2025). The effects of data privacy regulations on cybersecurity practices in Nigeria and Africa. Journal of Cyberspace Studies.

Böyük, M. (2025). User data and digital privacy: Privacy policies of social media platforms. The Turkish Online Journal of Design, Art and Communication, 15(1), 225–239. https://doi.org/10.7456/tojdac.1569287

Cheng, L., & Guo, Y. (2025). Privacy protection on social media platforms: Overdisclosure of online behavioral data is labeling users. International Journal of Digital Law and Governance, 2(1), 107–133. https://doi.org/10.1515/ijdlg-2025-0001

Chiamogu, A. P., & Chiamogu, U. P. (2025). From data to dignity: Rethinking privacy and consent in Nigeria’s digital age. Journal of Science and Information Technology Research.

Effoduh, O. J., & Odeh, O. F. (2024). Strengthening data protection: Ensuring privacy and security for Nigerian citizens.

Onatuyeh, E. A., Oghorodi, D., Okpako, E. A., & Ojei, E. (2025). Cybersecurity and business survival in Nigeria: Building customer’s trust. African Journal of Applied Research.

Osimen, G. U., &Wonosikou, M. H. (2025). National cybersecurity policy and citizens’ digital rights in Nigeria. African Human Rights Law Journal.

Peter, D. I., &Ndinojuo, B. C. E. (2024). Privacy awareness and social media: Personal data protection among Facebook and Instagram users. Galactica Media: Journal of Media Studies, 6(3), 168–198. https://doi.org/10.46539/gmd.v6i3.489

Ramadan, G., Risnain, M., &Nugraha, L. G. (2025). User data protection in the use of algorithms by social media platforms. Mataram Journal of International Law, 3(2), 107–115. https://doi.org/10.29303/z9ttkc13

Ugbedeojo, S. V. (2025). Data protection and compliance in Nigeria: Challenges and opportunities. SSRN. https://papers.ssrn.com/

Xie, J., Wang, X., Liu, Y., Gong, W., Yan, C., Rafique, W., Khan, M., & Khan, A. A. (2025). Social media-driven user community finding with privacy protection. Tsinghua Science and Technology, 30(4), 1782–1792. https://doi.org/10.26599/TST.2024.9010065

Yang, D. (2025). Application of data privacy protection technology in social media platforms. Journal of Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence, 2(2), 53–56.

 Sokoto Journal of Linguistics

Post a Comment

0 Comments