Cite this article as: Aliyu, Y. M. (2025). A linguistic stylistic analysis of Yusufu’s Love Path. Sokoto Journal of Linguistics and Communication Studies (SOJOLICS), 1(3), 168–175. https://www.doi.org/10.36349/sojolics.2025.v01i03.022
A LINGUISTIC
STYLISTIC ANALYSIS OF YUSUFU’S LOVE PATH
By
Yusuf Musa Aliyu
Department of English and Linguistics
Federal University Dutse
Abstract
Literature is a significant source of data for stylistic
studies. The study aims to examine stylistic features in the
AuwaluYusufuHaruna’s first novel in English. The research is primarily a
content analysis. It recognises that the novel has not attracted much
linguistic research interest since its coming into the limelight. To study it
from the linguistic viewpoint, the research applies the transitivity model
under Systemic Functional Linguistics by Halliday as an analytical tool. The
study explores the clauses with reference to system networks in general and the
transitivity system in particular. The research, first off, identified the
independent clauses in the text. Subsequently, 20 independent clauses were
randomly chosen for the analysis of transitivity patterns. The analysis pays
attention to participants, processes and circumstances in the clauses. The
research discovered that the material process is more frequent than other
process types in the novel by far, accounting for 40% of the 20 clauses with the
mental process accounting for 25%. This choice helped the writer in presenting
actions of the characters rather than giving a mere narration, and in effect
giving the story a sense of life.
Keywords: Style, stylistics, system networks, Systemic Functional
Linguistics, transitivity
1. Introduction
Stylistics studies language use in all its forms. Given that
stylistic investigations are often closely aligned with literature, it is not
uncommon to find the view that stylistics equals literary stylistics, even
though linguistic stylistics is a full-fledged type of stylistics with its own
methodologies. Consequently, literary stylistic studies are more frequently
conducted on literary works than linguistic stylistic analyses. This study
adopts the latter approach, focusing on the linguistic features of the novel Love
Path by Nigerian writer Auwalu Yusufu Hamza. The study is of linguistic
stylistic interest while retaining relevance to literary stylistics. Its areas
of interest include the metafunctions identified by the developers of systemic
functional theory (SFL), led by M.A.K. Halliday, with particular attention to
transitivity patterns. This framework allows the analysis of how the
experiential and logical worlds of the author are represented through the
experiences of the major characters in the text, Jamila and Adamu. Central to
this perspective is the notion that all languages possess metafunctions
represented in the lexicogrammar, Transitivity, Theme, and Mood, which SFL
theorists describe as system networks operating at the level of the clause.
This study focuses on the transitivity system to investigate how it structures
selected clauses in the novel and anchors the expression of meaning by the
author.
Auwalu Yusufu Hamza hails from Utai in Wudil Local
Government of Kaduna State, Nigeria. Born in 1959, he attended St. Louis
Primary School and Government Secondary School Gwale, both in Kano. He obtained
a Bachelor’s degree in Anthropology from the City University of New York and a
Professional Diploma in Mass Communication from Bayero University, Kano. He
served as chairman of the Association of Nigerian Authors (ANA), Kano State
Chapter. His notable works include Gidan Haya (Hausa), Citizen’s
Parade, Empty Courts, and A Question of Marriage.
The novel Love Path, the author’s debut in English,
contains 157 pages and was first published in 1999, with a reprint in 2007. The
text juxtaposes two distinct ways of life, the Hausa-Fulani cultural lifestyle
and the imported Western lifestyle, through the experiences of Jamila and
Adamu. The narrative argues that preserving traditional cultural values and
religious beliefs represents the appropriate path.
Style refers to the manner in which language users express
themselves. Language allows multiple modes of expression, enabling the same
message to be conveyed in numerous ways. The organization of speech or written
text provides insight into who produced it, the context of its production, the
intended audience, and the communicative purpose. For this reason, scholars
distinguish the styles of authors such as William Shakespeare, Toni Morrison,
post-colonial writers, Caribbean authors, and African American novelists, as
well as the genres they employ, including children’s literature, satire, and
protest writings. Style encompasses choices in sentence length, vocabulary, and
lexical complexity, and it is often argued that the language of poetry is less
accessible than that of autobiographies. Systemic Functional Linguistics
recognises this variability, framing language as a system of choice. According
to Leech and Short (1983), style involves the way language is used in a given
context, by a given person, for a given purpose. Stylistics, the branch of
linguistic study concerned with style, seeks to explain how varying language
choices serve different communicative purposes. Linguistic stylistic analyses
are conducted at multiple levels, including sound, word, phrase, clause,
sentence, text, and meaning, and they examine the relation between linguistic
form and literary function (Leech & Short, 1983).
Systemic Functional Linguistics (SFL) focuses on the
functions of language and its use (Coffin, Donohue, & North, 2009). It
offers a robust framework for understanding language and its communicative
potential (Fawcett, 2010). Within SFL, system networks, Transitivity, Mood, and
Theme, allow for a detailed analysis of clause-level meaning. Transitivity,
representing the ideational metafunction, is the system of representing the
world and is crucial for revealing the language user’s perspective. Unlike
analyses focused solely on form, transitivity analysis examines Participants,
Processes, and Circumstances within clauses (Halliday, 1994). The Process
represents the action, event, or state being described, Participants are those
involved, and Circumstances provide information about the surrounding context,
such as time, location, manner, or cause. Halliday (1994) identifies different
types of Processes, including Material (doing), Mental (sensing), Verbal
(saying), Existential (existing), and Relational-Attributive (attributing).
Through these components, transitivity analysis allows for a nuanced
understanding of how authors encode their experiences and perspectives within
the linguistic structure of a text.
In this study, the focus on transitivity in Love Path
allows for an exploration of how Auwalu Yusufu Hamza represents his characters’
experiences and, by extension, his worldview, using the linguistic resources of
English. By examining the choices made in the lexicogrammar, the study
highlights the interface between language form, stylistic function, and meaning
construction in literary discourse.
2. Literature Review
Abdulraheem (2016) carried out a linguistic stylistic study
of poems by TanureOjaide. The study delved into poetry studies using Systemic
Functional Linguistics. It concentrated on network systems – MOOD, THEME and
TRANSITIVITY. The researcher asked such questions as how lexical options in the
poems help in achieving meaning and how the choice of words and expressions
define’sOjaide’s style. He navigated the
semantic relations such as synonymy and repetition from the poems by Ojaide
such as The Fate and Delta Blues. This writer argues that the
introduction of semantic relations in a study that claims that adopt the
Halliday’s functional theory is misplaced. Restricting the research to the
system networks would have produced better outcomes in serving as a bridge between
the fictional world and the real one, and between the literary world and the
linguistic world through the lines of the poems.
Mohammed (2018) undertook a linguistic stylistic analysis of
two novels. The study analysed Toni Morrison’s Beloved and Paradise. It
employed the systemic functional approach. The investigation, like the present
one, focused on system networks – TRANSITIVITY, MOOD and THEME, bit unlike this
one, it was also interested in other linguistic details. Sentence types, the
application of repetition and semantic relations were as well investigated. In
TRANSITIVITY, the research restricted itself to material, mental and relational
processes. The findings revealed occurrence of more indicative moods –
declarative and interrogative. It was also discovered that the novels are full
of material, mental and relational processes. The work is related to the
present one for its use of Systemic Functional Linguistics to study a literary
form and more especially its focus on network systems. A particular attention
to system networks would have aided the research more in achieving its
objectives.
Elakeche (2015), in an investigation titled, ‘A Transitivity
Analysis of Alkali’s Stillborn’,
analysed the utterances, thoughts and actions of Grandma and other characters
she relates with in the novel using the transitivity theory. The findings of
the research suggest that language can be manipulated to build characters, and
that there are five classes of transitivity processes in the novel: material,
verbal, mental, relational and behavioural. It concludes that transitivity
gives more nuances to the commentary on the personality of characters. Like the
present study, the research applies the transitivity framework to study a
literary work. Unlike the current research, its scope accommodates utterances
of a defined number of characters in a text. While the current research relies
more on the utterances of the major characters, no utterance is discriminated
against.
Babangida (2016), in a research titled ‘Study of Language
and Style in Peter Abraham’s Mine BoyThrough
the Verbal Transitivity Process’, demonstrated the possibility of using the
transitivity theory in the analysis of literary narratives, adopting Halliday’s
transitivity theory. The study found that verbiage is the most significant part
of the verbal process and that verbiages are dynamic. Similar to the current
study, the research investigated style using the transitivity. Unlike the
present research that studies all the process types, the focus of the research
is the verbal process alone. A study of all the processes would have given a
more vivid picture of the story.
Orakwue (2015) embarked on a study entitled ‘A Linguistic
Stylistic Analysis of ChimamandaAdichie’sPurple
Hibiscus and Half of a Yellow Sun.
The study was aimed at identifying some linguistic features. The author made
use of the transitivity model to appreciate her cultural and historical
realities behind the novels. The researcher used Systemic Functional
Linguistics to accomplish this task. The study examined the author’s use of
nouns, processes, adverbs and sentence types. It discovered more proper and common
nouns, material processes, adverbs of manner and not many simple sentences. The
research also revealed that register variables hugely affected the writer’s
choices. The research is relevant to the present one for studying Adichie’s
texts and its employment of Systemic Functional Linguistics. It is different
from this study in that it studied a different author. A strict focus on the
transitivity patterns would have saved the research from derailing.
Isyaku (2014) examined patterns of transitivity in news
media. He analyses transitivity system in selected newspaper reports across
subjects that are related to health, politics, education, sports and science.
He asks questions such as how transitivity system accounts for language
function in newspaper reporting from Systemic Linguistic point of view and how
newsmen package and present their experiences of life. Findings of the research
reveal that mental, material, relational and verbal processes are found in news
reports. Isyaku’s research is related to the present one because of its use of
SFL as theoretical framework.
3. Theoretical foundation and Research Method
Transitivity is the model adopted for the study. This
analytical tool is otherwise known as the transitive system or the grammar of
experience (Halliday and Matthiessen, 2004). The research acknowledges that
literature is a platform exploited by writers to put their experience of the
world on the paper. This transitive system construes the experience of language
users through processes (goings-on).
In transitivity, the Actor functions in the structure of the
clause as representation. A clause has meaning as a representation of
some process in ongoing human experience; the Actor is the active participant
in that process. It is the element the speaker portrays as the one that does
the deed(Halliday and Matthiessen, 2004).
The clause is also a mode of reflection, of imposing order
on the endless variation and flow of events. The grammatical system by which
this is achieved is that of TRANSITIVITY
(cf. Halliday, 1967/8). The transitivity system construes the world of
experience into a manageable set of PROCESS
TYPES. Each process type provides its own model or schema for construing
a particular domain of experience as a figure of a particular kind — a model
such as the one illustrated above for construing signification: Token (usually) + Process (means) + Value (mostly).
A simple clause consists of a process (action, event or
state) and one or more participants in that process. To this may be added
various circumstances. The relationship between a process and its participants
is known as transitivity (Banks, 2019:21-34).
There are various processes types: material process, mental process,
relational process, verbal process, existential process and behavioural process
(ibid).
Material processes are actions and events which take place
in the physical world (Banks, 2019). It has to do with goings-on. Material
processes typically of an agentive type (Banks, 2019). The participant that
performs the action is referred to as ACTOR and the entity affected by the
action is BENEFICIARY, GOAL or RANGE.
Mental processes are events of a cerebral nature: these can
be ‘cognitive’, dealing with types of thinking, ‘perception’, dealing with
types of sensing (seeing, hearing, etc) or ‘affective’, dealing with liking and
disliking (Banks, 2019:21-34). They have two participants: SENSER and
PHENOMENON.
Relational processes state a relationship between two
entities, or between an entity and its characteristics. There are three types
of relational processes: attributive (which gives the characteristics or
features of an entity), identifying (which refers to the same entity in
different words) and possessive (deals with things like the relationship of
inclusion, which can be assimilated to possession). In other words, relational
processes link two items or an item with its attributes. The attributive process
has two participants: CARRIER and ATTRIBUTE. The identifying process has SIGN
and VALUE as its participants. The possessive process has POSSESSOR and
POSSESSED.
Verbal processes are processes of communication (Banks,
2019:21-34). They have two participants: SAYER (the person who is
communicating) and VERBIAGE (the content).
Existential processes indicate the existence of something.
These clauses have only one participant: EXISTENT. Behavioural processes are
dealing with behaving. They have BEHAVER and BEHAVIOUR. The processes have been
summarized in the following table:
Table i: Process types
|
|
Process type |
Category meaning |
Participants |
|
|
1. |
Material |
‘doing’ |
Actor,
goal |
|
|
|
(a)
Action |
‘doing’ |
|
|
|
|
(b)
Event |
‘happening’ |
|
|
|
2. |
Mental |
‘sensing’ |
Phenomenon |
|
|
|
|
‘seeing’ |
|
|
|
|
|
‘sensing’ |
|
|
|
|
|
‘thinking’ |
|
|
|
3. |
Relational |
‘being’ |
Token,
Value |
|
|
|
(a)
Attribution |
‘attributing’ |
Carrier,
attribute |
|
|
|
(b)Identification
|
‘identifying’
|
Identifier,
identified |
|
|
4. |
Behavioural |
‘behaving’ |
Behaver |
|
|
5. |
Verbal |
‘saying’ |
Sayer,
Target |
|
|
6. |
Existential |
‘existing’ |
Existent |
|
Adopted
from Halliday(1981:131) in Elakeche (2015: 21)
The study makes use of the random sampling procedure to draw 20 clauses from the clauses that make up the novel. The transitivity is found only in an independent clause. 20 clauses will be the representatives of all the main clauses in the text.This data selection method will help the writer to investigate the actual experiences of the author. It then dissects each of the clauses to make clear which portion is Participants, which section is Process and which is Circumstance. The type of participant each clause has is tied up to what process type it embodies. These processes are labelled as Material, Mental, Behavioural, Existential, Verbal and Relational.
4.
Data Presentation and Analysis
Each
of the 20 clauses is analysedin a tabular form. Each analysis reveals the
participant(s), process and circumstance, where it is present.
Table 1
…you say it’s some sort of a religious issue
(P. 1)
|
You |
Say |
It’s some sort of a religious issue |
|
Sayer |
Pro: Verbal |
Verbiage |
‘You’
is the participant in the clause above. The constituent indicates the maker of
the statement that is the point of reference. ‘Say’ is the process. Because it
is about saying, it denotes a verbal process. ‘Verbiage’ shows the remarks made
by the participant. The clause projects the central theme of the novel, the
clash of religions and civilisations.
Table 2
You
see (P. 3)
|
You |
See |
|
Senser |
Process:
Mental |
‘You’
is the participant in this sequence. What the participant does is engage his
‘celebral environment’ to ‘see’, a mental process that deals with perception of
reality.
Table 3
Allwe
are saying is that members of our Club have the right to an assembly… (P. 3)
|
We |
Are
saying |
is
that members of our Club have the right to an assembly |
|
Sayer |
Pro:
Verbal |
Verbiage |
‘We’ is the element that fits the participant slot within the structure of this clause. The predicator ‘saying’ signifies the verbal process while the remainder of the clause constitutes what is said by the participant
Table 4
She
was gorgeous, tall and slim with a great figure (P. 10).
|
She |
Was |
Gorgeous,
tall and slim with a great figure |
|
Carrier
|
Pro:
Relational |
Attribute |
The
nominal group ‘she’ is the participant in this relational clause. The finite
element ‘was’ introduces the relational process while the adjectival group and
prepositional phrase function altogether as an attribute of the nominal
element.
Table 5
The
scholarship gave her the opportunity to study for her secondary education in
England (P. 11).
|
The
scholarship |
Gave |
The
opportunity |
To
study for her secondary education |
In
England |
|
Actor |
Pro:
Material |
Range |
Circs:
Reason |
Circs:
location |
The sequence ‘the scholarship’ is the participant in this material process. The predicator ‘gave’ introduces process. The second nominal group ‘the opportunity’ is the range of the material process. ‘To study for her secondary education’ is a circumstance of reason while the prepositional phrase ‘in England’ is a circumstance of location.
Table 6
The
atmosphere was cool… (P. 11)
|
The
atmosphere |
Was |
Cool |
|
Carrier |
Pro:
Relational |
Attribute |
The nominal group ‘the atmosphere’ is the participant. The finite element ‘was’ introduces the relational processes while the adjectival group is the attribute of the carrier expressed in the nominal group.
Table 7
…Humaira
saw Umar, the Ameer of the Mujahedeens (P. 12)
|
…Humaira |
Saw |
Umar,
the Ameer of the Mujahedeens |
|
Senser |
Pro:
Mental |
Phenomenon |
The nominal element ‘Humaira’ is the participant in this clause. The mental process is introduced by the predicator ‘saw’. The remaining part of the clause is the phenomenon which the senser perceives.
Table 8
The
slim, cheerful man greeted Jameela…. (P. 13)
|
The
slim, cheerful man |
Greeted |
Jameela |
|
Actor |
Pro:
Material |
Target |
The nominal group which has ‘man’ as its head is the participant in this clause. The material clause is expressed by the predicator ‘greeted’. The second nominal element is the recipient of the action the participant did.
Table 9
You
know yayaAdamu (P. 16).
|
You |
Know |
YayaAdamu |
|
Senser |
Pro:
Mental |
Phenomenon
|
The nominal element ‘you’ is the first participant in this clause. The mental process of perception is expressed through the predicator ‘know’. The second nominal group is the reality that the senser perceived.
Table 10
They
said hello to them… (P. 17).
|
They |
Said |
Hello |
To
them |
|
Sayer |
Pro:
verbal |
Verbiage |
Receiver |
The nominal group ‘they’ is the first participant in this clause. The verbal process is unveiled by the predicator ‘said’. ‘Hello’ is what the first participant said. The prepositional phrase ‘to them’ is the receiver.
Table 11
I know
(P. 18).
|
I |
Know |
|
Senser |
Pro:
Mental |
The nominal element ‘I’ is the participant, Senser. The mental element of perceiving reality is expressed by the predicator ‘know’.
Table 12
Jameela
slept well… (P. 20).
|
Jameela |
Slept
|
Well |
|
Behaver |
Pro:
Behavioural |
Circumstance
|
The nominal element ‘Jameela’ is the participant. The verbal group ‘slept’ represents the behavioural process while ‘well’ is a circumstance showing how the participant slept.
Table 13
Humaira
waited…. (P. 20).
|
Humaira |
Waited |
|
Actor |
Pro:
Material |
The nominal group ‘Humaira’ is the participant in the above close. The did something. That thing she did was ‘waiting’, which is a material process.
Table 14
The
girls sat in the back seat of Adamu’s BMW 525i…. (P. 21)
|
The
girls |
Sat |
in
the back seat |
of
Adamu’s BMW 525i |
|
Actor |
Pro:
Material |
Circs:
location |
Circs:
location |
The nominal group ‘the girls’ is the participant in the clause above. The verbal group ‘sat’ is the material clause. The two prepositional phrases function as a circumstance of location.
Table 15
She
handed the phone to him (P. 22)
|
She |
Handed |
The
phone |
To
him |
|
Actor |
Pro:
Material |
Goal |
Circs:
receiver |
‘She’ is the participant. The predicator ‘handed’ is the material clause. The second nominal group ‘the phone’ is the goal while the prepositional phrase ‘to him’ is a circumstance.
Table 16
…Adamu
announced that he didn’t have enough money (P. 27).
|
Adamu |
Announced |
that
he didn’t have enough money |
|
Sayer |
Pro:
Verbal |
Verbiage |
The nominal group ‘Adamu’ is the participant in this process. The predicator ‘announced’ stands for the verbal process. ‘That he didn’t have enough money’ is what the participant said.
Table 17
I know
what you mean (P. 28).
|
I |
Know |
What
you mean |
|
Senser |
Pro:
Mental |
Phenomenon |
The nominal group “I’ is the first participant in this process. The predicator ‘know’ introduces the mental process of cognition. ‘What you mean’ is the phenomenon.
Table 18
You
switch it off… (P. 29).
|
You |
Switch |
It |
Off |
|
Actor |
Pro:
Material |
Affected |
Circs:
manner |
The nominal group ‘you’ is the first participant in this clause. The predicator ‘switch’ introduces the material process of going-on. The second participant ‘it’ is affected by the doing of the first participant. The adverbial group is a circumstance.
Table 19
She
dropped the receiver on her bed…. (P. 37)
|
She |
Dropped |
The
receiver |
On
her bed |
|
Actor |
Pro:
Material |
Affected |
Circs:
location |
‘She’
is the first participant in the close above process. The predicator ‘dropped’
is the material process. The second participant in the nominal group ‘the
receiver’ is affected by the action of the first participant. The prepositional
phrase ‘on her bed’ is a circumstance of location.
Table 20
She
stood up from her chair… (P. 150).
|
She |
Stood
up |
from
her chair |
|
Actor |
Pro:
Material |
Circs:
location |
The nominal group ‘she’ is the participant. The verbal group that succeeds it expresses the material process. The prepositional phrase that follows represent a circumstance of location.
5. Discussion of
Findings
From the 20 clauses analysed, it was found out that the
material process (of happening or doing) is more frequent, accounting for 40%
of the process types. This has an effect in the story. The story is told from
the third person point of view. The writer presents the events in the novel in
a way that he is able to give the story life. He gives a picture of what his
characters did rather than give a rendition non-stop. This kind of style is
engaging the audience for readers would feel as though they are watching a show
in a concert. This way of organising stories is more common in the literary
genre for in dramas stories are demonstrated whereas they are narrated in
prose-fiction. It follows that the style of AuwalYusufu in the novel is that of
plays and a deviation from the manner of composing prose.
Next to it is the mental process. It is now an established
fact that transitivity has to do with representation of the world. Writers of
fiction take advantage of the literary avenue to express the experience of the
world under their belt to reader. It is therefore not a wonder that in the
expression of these experiences through characters, the mental process accounts
for 25% of the process types.
The use of the verbal process to tell stories in the prose
genre is the most usual thing. However, the verbal process is not the dominant
process but the third, accounting for only 20% of the process types. As raised
elsewhere, this makes the style of the author somewhat different from the
conventional style of prose-fiction.
The transitivity patterns reinforce the central thematic
preoccupation of the novel, which is the need to preserve religious and
cultural identities of the setting.
The findings are summarized in the table blow.
Table 21
|
S/N |
Process |
Frequency |
Percentage
|
|
1 |
Material |
8 |
40% |
|
2 |
Mental |
5 |
25% |
|
3 |
Verbal |
4 |
20% |
|
4 |
Relational |
2 |
10% |
|
5 |
Behavioural |
1 |
5% |
|
Total |
|
20 |
100% |
6. Conclusion
The study has attempted to analyseLove Path by AuwalYusufu from the perspective of the transitivity model chsmpioned by Systemic Functional Linguistics. In other words, the discussion was on the clause in its ideational function. The purpose was to find out which of the process types is more frequent in the text and how does the more frequency it instead of others helped in conveying the intended message. The material process, which shows events or happenings as they unfold which gives the audience a sense of what is going, outnumbers other processes in the novel. The implication of the process taking the lion’s share is that the story is very active, typical of the style since in the drama genre, which shows things rather than narrating stories.
References
Abdulraheem, H. (2016). A linguistic
stylistic analysis of TanureOjaide’s poetry (Unpublished PhD dissertation).
Ahmadu Bello University, Zaria.
Babangida, S. (2016). Study of
language and style in Peter Abraham’s Mine Boy through the verbal transitivity
process (Unpublished MA thesis). Bayero University, Kano.
Banks, D. (2019). A systemic
functional grammar of English: A simple introduction. Routledge.
Coffin, C., Donohue, J., & North,
S. (2009). Exploring English grammar. Routledge.
Elakeche, L. O. (2015). A
transitivity analysis of Alkali’s Stillborn (Unpublished MA thesis). Bayero
University, Kano.
Fawcett, R. P. (2010). A theory of
syntax for systemic functional linguistics. John Benjamins Publishing
Company.
Halliday, M. A. K. (1994). An
introduction to functional grammar. Edward Arnold.
Halliday, M. A. K., & Matthiessen,
C. (2004). An introduction to functional grammar (3rd ed.). Arnold.
Isyaku, S. (2014). Language and
media reporting: A study of transitivity system in selected Nigerian newspapers
(Unpublished PhD dissertation). Ahmadu Bello University, Zaria.
Leech, G. N., & Short, M. H.
(1983). Style in fiction: A linguistic introduction to English fictional
prose. Longman.
Mohammed, H. (2018). A linguistic
stylistic analysis of Toni Morrison’s Beloved and Paradise (Unpublished PhD
dissertation). Ahmadu Bello University, Zaria.
Orakwue, E. F. (2015). A linguistic
stylistic analysis of Chimamanda Adichie’s Purple Hibiscus and Half of a Yellow
Sun (Unpublished MA thesis). Ahmadu Bello University, Zaria.
Yusufu, A. H. (2004). Love Path.
Adamu Joji Publishers.
0 Comments