Foreign Policies and Diplomacy of African States: Its Impact on the Decolonisation Movement 1950-1990

Cite this article as: Nwala P. (2025). Foreign Policies and Diplomacy of African States: Its Impact on the Decolonisation Movement 1950-1990.Zamfara International Journal of Humanities,3(2), 20-34.www.doi.org/10.36349/zamijoh.2025.v03i02.003

FOREIGN POLICIES AND DIPLOMACY OF AFRICAN STATES: ITS IMPACT ON THE DECOLONISATION MOVEMENT 1950-1990

Dr Paul Nwala
Department of History and International Diplomacy
Rivers State University, Nkpolu-Oroworukwo, Port Harcourt

Abstract: This study examines the interplay between Foreign Policy and Diplomacy employed by African states during the decolonization period that spanned from 1950 to 1990. The research aims to analyze the effects of these strategies on the decolonization movement, with a focus on key objectives such as assessing the impact of pivotal events, including the Bandung Conference of 1955, and examining the roles of influential figures like Kwame Nkrumah, Julius Nyerere, and Gamal Abdel Nasser. It also evaluates the contributions of pan-African and regional cooperation, the Non-Aligned Movement, and human rights advocacy to the struggle for independence and the broader shift in global power dynamics during this period. The study adopts a qualitative methodology, relying on an extensive review of extant literature, archival materials, and historical case studies. Comparative analysis highlights how African nations effectively leveraged diplomatic strategies to secure independence, promote unity, and assert themselves on the global stage. The findings reveal that African states played a pivotal role in reshaping international relations by championing self-determination, fostering solidarity, and advancing human rights, contributing significantly to the decolonization movement and the realignment of global power structures.

Keywords: Decolonization, Foreign Policy, Diplomacy, African States.

Introduction

The decolonization of African states during the mid-20th century marked a significant turning point in global history, the dismantling of colonial empires and the rise of newly independent nations. Central to this transformation were the foreign policies and diplomatic efforts of African leaders and states, which sought to secure sovereignty while navigating the international arena shaped by the Cold War, shifting global power dynamics, and the emergence of multilateral institutions (E Myrice, 2015). Events such as the Bandung Conference of 1955, the establishment of the Non-Aligned Movement, and the advocacy for human rights underscored Africa's determination to assert its agency on the global stage. The study focuses on the interplay between these foreign policy strategies and diplomatic initiatives, shedding light on their impact on the decolonization movement between 1950 and 1990. Despite the considerable progress achieved during this period, challenges persisted, particularly in the uneven pace of independence across the continent and the varying effectiveness of diplomatic strategies. The problem lies in understanding how African states, through their foreign policies and diplomatic engagements, influenced the speed and scope of decolonization (D. Huda, 2022). Furthermore, critical issues remain regarding the role of pan-African cooperation, regional alliances, and human rights advocacy in reshaping international relations and achieving self-determination.

The body of knowledge on African decolonization provides valuable insights into the historical and political dimensions of the period.

However, significant gaps remain in comprehensively addressing the interconnectedness of African foreign policies, diplomacy, and global power dynamics. Most studies focus on individual nations or events, often neglecting the broader regional and transcontinental strategies that characterized Africa's collective efforts. This research aims to bridge these gaps by providing a nuanced analysis of how African states collectively shaped the decolonization movement through innovative diplomacy and strategic alliances, emphasizing their impact on global political realignments.

In the light of the foregoing, this study seeks to examine the foreign policies and diplomatic strategies employed by African states during the decolonization movement an analyze the impact of pivotal events such as the Bandung Conference of 1955 and the Non-Aligned Movement on African diplomacy. The study will assess the contributions of influential figures like Kwame Nkrumah, Julius Nyerere, and Gamal Abdel Nasser to the decolonization process and further evaluate the role of pan-African and regional cooperation, human rights advocacy, and the shift in global power dynamics during this transformative period.

The study adopts a qualitative research approach, relying on a detailed review of primary and secondary sources, including archival documents, speeches, policy papers, and historical case studies. Comparative analysis will be employed to evaluate the diplomatic strategies and their outcomes across different African states. Furthermore, thematic analysis will explore recurring patterns in pan-African cooperation, human rights advocacy, and non-alignment as critical drivers of decolonization. This methodology ensures a comprehensive understanding of the subject matter, highlighting Africa's pivotal role in transforming global diplomacy and advancing the decolonization agenda.

Conceptual Clarifications

Foreign Policy

Foreign policy is the mechanism which the national governments use to guide their diplomatic interactions and relationships with other countries. A state’s foreign policy reflects its values and goals, and helps drive its political and economic aims in the global arena. Many foreign policies also have a strong focus on national and international security, and will help determine how a country interacts with international organizations, such as the United Nations, and citizens of other countries.

Foreign policies are developed and influenced by a number of factors. These include:

 i.        A country’s circumstances in a number of areas, including geographically, financially, politically, and so on.

ii.       The behavior and foreign policies of other countries.

iii.        The state of international order and affairs more widely (for example, is there war or unrest? Are there trade alliances to take into consideration?).

iv.        Plans for advancement, such as economic advancement or technological advancement.

Guided by foreign policy, diplomats and diplomatic bodies can work across borders to tackle shared challenges, promote stability, and protect shared interests. A nation’s foreign policy typically works in tandem with its domestic policy, which is another form of public policy that focuses on matters at home. Together, the two policies complement one another and work to strengthen the country’s position both within and outside its borders (University of York, 2022).

Diplomacy

Diplomacy is recognized as the official machinery for the conduct of relations among nations. Diplomacy functions through a network of foreign offices, embassies, legations, consulates and special missions all over the world. It always works according to definite and settled procedures and protocol. Diplomacy is commonly bilateral in chance, as well as multilateral as growing importance of international conferences, international organizations, regional negotiations; it has now also developed a plural character.

The principles of diplomatic operations includes: national interest, credibility, clarity, comprehensiveness, understanding,  perceptiveness, circumspection, confidence-building, decisiveness, perseverance. Nonetheless, these principles are the guiding fundamental that helps aid the smooth running of the mechanism of diplomacy as a diplomatic practice. Also the professionals in charge in adhering to these principles and nature of diplomacy in bringing them to actualization must possess essential qualities, to be regarded as diplomats includes: honesty, integrity, trustfulness, politeness, fairness, strict conformity to protocol, secrecy and total commitment to national interests (Abdurahmanli, 2021).

Objectives of African Diplomacy

Broadly, diplomacy has two primary objectives for the nation it represents and they includes:

Political objectives which always seek to secure goals of national interest as defined by the foreign policy. It always works for increasing the influence of the state over other states. It uses persuasion, promises of rewards and other such means for these purposes. Through rational negotiations, it seeks to justify the objectives of the foreign policy of a nation and it promotes friendship and cooperation with other nations.

Non-political objectives of diplomacy: the interdependence among nations is the most important and valuable fact of international living. Each nation depends upon others for economic and industrial links and trade. It seeks to promote economic, commercial and cultural links of a nation with other nations. Diplomacy depends upon peaceful means, persuasive methods for promoting the interests of the nation; this is indeed an important non-political objective of diplomacy (Baston, 1988).

 Importance of African Diplomacy

From the preceding discussion, we have established that diplomacy is the art and science of maintaining peaceful relationships between and among nations, groups or individuals in issues such as; conflict, trade, environment, technology, security etc. hence, the main importance of diplomacy is to ensure peaceful relations between countries which might include negotiating new policies and tacking disputes, and this could be considered as a key function of diplomacy likewise. Another importance of diplomacy especially in this 21^st century is that, it facilitates communication between political leaders of states and other entities in world politics. Thus, without communication, there would be no international system which will result to absent of interactions among states.

Diplomacy helps in arbitrations and mediation: it is a tool of foreign policy that helps to implement foreign policy effectively, use of soft power methods to ensure international peace, promotes cooperation between states and aids or facilitates dispute resolution (Boyer, 2021).

Functions of African Diplomacy

The basic functions of diplomacy are: representing states national interest on the international arena or international political environment, obtaining information by gaining information about the other states in order to promote and protect the interest of nations by diplomats sent to other countries for representation of their home government, expand political, economical and cultural ties between states because in the world we live in interdependence is inevitable. Summarily, the functions of diplomacy are: communication, representation, negotiation, protection of citizens in receiving states, intelligence gathering, image management, issue of information sharing, policy implementation. More so, the art and practice of diplomacy is dependent on the aforementioned functions (Adaye, 2006).

Advantages of African Diplomacy

The art of diplomacy has numerous advantages in which the quality of a good diplomat evidenced in any diplomat representing his/her nation facilitates these advantages.

But firstly, the qualities of a good diplomat include: attractive personality, multi-lingua, being outspoken, and intelligence have good choice of words etc.

The Advantages of Diplomacy Are:

-          Keeps enemies and rivals at bay

-          Settle disputes amiably

-          Diplomatic measures pays off dully

-          One is able to win over people

-          Also it makes one closer to people as you are less likely to offend them

-          Results are reached by all parties involved and

thus tends to be more durable

-          Results arrived at by diplomacy are more agreeable to all involved, certainly when compared to warfare

-          Results presume to be cheaper than its alternatives.

-          The use of fact and diplomacy appropriately can lead to improved relationships with other people and is a way to build and develop mutual respect, which in turn can lead to more successful outcomes and less difficult or stressful communications.

Nonetheless, the purpose of diplomacy is to strengthen the state, nation, or organization it serves in relation to others by advancing the interest in its charge. To this end, diplomatic activity endeavours to maximize a group’s advantages without the risk and expense of using force and preferably without causing resentment. It habitually, but not invariably strives to preserve peace, diplomacy is strongly inclined towards negotiation to achieve agreements and resolve issues between states. Even in times of peace, diplomacy may involve coercive threats of economic or other punitive measures of demonstrations of the capability to impose unilateral solutions to disputes by the application of military power. Thus, diplomacy normally seeks to develop goodwill toward the state it represents, nurturing relations with foreign states and peoples that will ensure their cooperation or failing their neutrality (Aver, 2020).

Brief Origin of Diplomacy

In understanding the mechanism of diplomacy, a concept as wide as this, it is necessary; its origin must be likewise understood considering the nature of the types of diplomacy, a key mechanism or process of the practice of diplomacy. The historical development of diplomatic practice is divided into three (3) epochs namely: Ancient, Medieval and Modern Diplomacy but for the sake of brevity, a rundown of its origin is discussed in the following paragraphs.

The first civilization to practice an orderly system of diplomacy was ancient Greece. Ambassadors and Special Missions were sent from city to city to deliver messages and warnings, to transfer gifts and to plead the cases of their own people, before the rulers of other city-states. These diplomatic missions, however, were occasional and sporadic. With the doctrine of Greece and the rise of the Roman Empire, the Greek system of diplomacy disappeared. As Rome expanded, its diplomacy served the purposes of conquest and annexation. The Romans were not inclined to coexist with other states on the basis of mutual interest. Rome issued commands; it did not negotiate for almost a thousand years after the fall of Rome, Europeans thought of themselves not as members of separate nations but rather as members of smaller groups vaguely bound to some feudal overlord.

Although localities had relations from time to time, no record exists of any formal diplomatic practices during the middle ages. By the seventeenth century, there had arisen piecemeal in Europe an extremely complex and disjointed code of diplomatic procedures, a code that resulted in confusion with respect to precedence and protocol. Frequent and violent disputes over questions of diplomatic status, prestige and power became the order of the time. It was not until the Congress of Vienna (1815) and Aix-la-Chapelle (1818) that a serious effort was made to simplify the classification of diplomatic agents and formalize their function. The aim here is to identify the controversies around the institution of the consul in the 19^th century with the Vienna to x-raying the implications of Modern Diplomacy that diplomacy is referred to practices and institutions by which nations conduct their relations with one another. This explanation connotes that, as soon as people organize themselves into separate social groups, the necessity of regularizing contacts with representatives of other groups become apparent (Nicolson, 1979)

Decolonisation

Decolonization refers to the process by which colonized nations gain independence and reclaim sovereignty over their territories. It often involves political, social, and economic transformations. In the mid-20th century, many African, Asian, and Caribbean countries gained independence from European colonial powers. It involves the dismantling of colonial structures and the restoration of self-governance to the indigenous people of the affected regions. Decolonization can occur through various means, including negotiations, armed struggle, and international diplomatic efforts, and it often represents a shift from imperial control to the establishment of independent, self-determining nations. This process was driven by various factors, including nationalist movements, post-World War II shifts in global power dynamics, and international pressure for self-determination. Decolonization efforts aimed to dismantle colonial structures, restore cultural identity, and establish self-governance. However, challenges such as economic dependency, border issues, and legacies of colonialism persisted, shaping the post-colonial world (Britannica, 2021).

The Practice of Diplomacy in the Period of Decolonisation in Africa from 1950-1990.

The decolonization of Africa from 1950 to 1990 was a transformative period marked by the liberation of numerous African nations from European colonial rule. Here's a detailed overview of key events and factors during this significant period.

Preceding the 1950s, factors such as the Atlantic Charter (1941) and the establishment of the United Nations (1945) created an international atmosphere favoring self-determination and independence for colonized nations. Ghana, formerly the Gold Coast, led the way in 1957 when it gained independence from British colonial rule under the leadership of Kwame Nkrumah. This event marked the beginning of the end of formal European colonization in Africa. Across Africa, nationalist movements emerged, seeking self-rule and challenging colonial powers. Algeria's war of independence against France (1954-1962) and Kenya's Mau Mau uprising against British rule (1952-1960) exemplified the armed struggles associated with decolonization. British Prime Minister Harold Macmillan delivered the famous "Winds of Change" speech in 1960, acknowledging the inevitability of African independence and signaling a shift in British colonial policy. The Organization of African Unity (OAU) was established in 1963 to promote unity among African nations and coordinate efforts to end remaining colonial territories. The OAU played a key role in supporting liberation movements. Portuguese colonies faced a more prolonged struggle for independence, with Mozambique, Angola, and Guinea-Bissau gaining freedom in the mid-1970s following the Carnation Revolution in Portugal. Namibia achieved independence in 1990 after years of struggle against South African rule. The end of apartheid in South Africa played a crucial role in Namibia's path to independence. South Africa's apartheid system and resistance to it were central to the region's history. The release of Nelson Mandela in 1990 marked a turning point, eventually leading to the end of apartheid and the first democratic elections in 1994 (Martin, 2021).

Many newly independent African nations faced economic challenges, including inherited colonial borders, dependence on former colonial powers, and struggles for economic self-sufficiency. Neocolonial influences persisted as foreign powers sought to maintain economic and political influence in the region. Decolonization also involved a renewed emphasis on cultural identity and social justice. African nations sought to reclaim their heritage, languages, and traditions, which had often been suppressed during the colonial era. The decolonization of Africa during the period from 1950 to 1990 was a complex and multifaceted process, involving a mix of diplomatic negotiations, armed struggles, and significant shifts in international attitudes toward colonialism. The legacy of this era continues to shape the political, economic, and cultural landscape of the African continent. Indigenous nationalist movements, fueled by a desire for self-determination and independence, played a crucial role in decolonization. Leaders like Kwame Nkrumah in Ghana, Jomo Kenyatta in Kenya, and Nelson Mandela in South Africa emerged as prominent figures in these struggles. The aftermath of World War II saw a shift in global power dynamics. European colonial powers were weakened economically and politically, making it challenging for them to maintain their overseas empires. The war also exposed the contradictions of colonialism and raised international awareness about the principles of self-determination. The international community, including the United Nations, played a role in pressuring colonial powers to relinquish control. Resolutions and declarations emphasized the right of all peoples to freely choose their political status, contributing to a global sentiment favoring decolonization. Economic considerations were significant in the decolonization process. European powers faced economic challenges in maintaining distant colonies, and the desire for resource exploitation and economic self-sufficiency motivated many African nations to seek independence. Decolonization aimed not only at political independence but also at reclaiming cultural identity. African nations sought to restore and celebrate their cultural heritage, languages, and traditions, which had often been suppressed during the colonial era. Despite gaining independence, many African nations faced challenges such as economic dependency, border disputes inherited from colonial demarcations, and the lingering impacts of colonial rule, including socio-economic inequalities and political instability. Overall, the decolonization of Africa was a complex and multifaceted process that marked a significant turning point in global history, leading to the establishment of independent African nations and reshaping the geopolitical landscape of the continent (Martin, 2021).

Diplomatic Relations among African States.

Diplomacy has been used in the conduct of foreign policies in Africa. However, a disconcerting trend in the practice of diplomacy in Africa is the often limited successes, and sometimes failures, of states and regional organizations in achieving foreign policy objectives. Remarkably, such failures are not only typical of diplomacy targeting external actors, but are equally visible in intra-African diplomacy. By and large the diplomatic skills of Africa are tested mostly during periods of conflicts and threats to regional security. In most of these situations, diplomacy has proved to be ineffective in achieving desired outcomes. Consequently, most conflicts remain unresolved, while threats to good governance persist. The failures of diplomacy are largely due to a confluence of factors, including the quality of diplomacy and mediators, the pervasiveness of conflicts, Africa’s lack of international influence, its dependence on external actors and consequent lack of assertiveness, as well as Africa’s lack of courage to stand up to errant leaders whose actions threaten good governance and regional security. Diplomatic relations among African states have evolved over time, shaped by historical, political, economic, and regional factors. Here are some key aspects:

Pan-Africanism: The concept of Pan-Africanism, advocating for unity and cooperation among African nations, has been a guiding principle in diplomatic relations. Organizations like the Organization of African Unity (OAU) and its successor, the African Union (AU), have worked towards fostering collaboration (Bariagaber, 2019).

Regional Organizations: Regional bodies, such as the Economic Community of West African States (ECOWAS), the Southern African Development Community (SADC), and the East African Community (EAC), play crucial roles in facilitating diplomatic cooperation and addressing regional challenges.

Conflict Resolution: African nations engage in diplomatic efforts to address regional conflicts and promote peace. Mediation and peacekeeping initiatives are often led by regional organizations, with support from the AU and international partners.

Economic Cooperation: Economic cooperation is a significant aspect of diplomatic relations. Initiatives like the African Continental Free Trade Area (AfCFTA) aim to promote intra-African trade, economic integration, and development.

Bilateral Relations: Bilateral relations involve interactions between individual African nations. These relationships can be influenced by historical ties, shared economic interests, and diplomatic initiatives. Treaties, agreements, and memoranda of understanding are common tools for formalizing these relationships.

Cross-Border Issues: Diplomatic relations often address cross-border challenges, including issues related to migration, environmental concerns, and shared resources. Collaborative efforts are essential to finding mutually beneficial solutions.

Security Cooperation: African states collaborate on security matters to address common threats such as terrorism, transnational crime, and border security. Joint military exercises, intelligence sharing, and peacekeeping missions contribute to regional stability.

Cultural and Educational Exchanges: Diplomatic relations extend to cultural and educational exchanges, fostering mutual understanding and people-to-people connections. These initiatives contribute to a deeper appreciation of diverse African cultures.

Diplomatic Summits and Conferences: Diplomatic summits and conferences provide platforms for leaders to discuss regional challenges, share perspectives, and strengthen diplomatic ties. These events can lead to the formulation of joint policies and initiatives.

Humanitarian Cooperation: African nations collaborate on humanitarian efforts, responding to natural disasters, health crises, and other emergencies. Mutual support in times of need strengthens diplomatic bonds (Bariagaber, 2019).

Practical Examples of Diplomatic Relations among Africa

Diplomatic relations among African states are dynamic and multifaceted, involving a range of collaborations, conflicts, and partnerships. Here are a few real-life examples to illustrate the complexities of these relations:

Ethiopia and Eritrea (Post-2018): Historically, Ethiopia and Eritrea experienced a prolonged conflict leading to Eritrea's secession in 1993. However, in 2018, both countries signed a historic peace agreement, ending decades of hostility. This reconciliation demonstrated the potential for diplomatic breakthroughs in the region (Ian, 2018).

South Africa and Nigeria: South Africa and Nigeria, as two of the continent's largest economies, have had both cooperative and competitive elements in their relationship. Economic interests, cultural ties, and regional leadership aspirations sometimes lead to diplomatic cooperation, but differences also emerge on various issues, highlighting the complexity of inter-state relations.

Kenya and Somalia (Maritime Dispute): Kenya and Somalia have been involved in a diplomatic dispute over maritime boundaries. In 2014, Somalia filed a case with the International Court of Justice (ICJ) seeking to redraw the maritime boundary. The ongoing legal proceedings highlight the challenges of resolving territorial disputes diplomatically.

Rwanda and Uganda (Tensions): Rwanda and Uganda have experienced diplomatic tensions, including allegations of supporting rebel groups and espionage. The strained relations have led to border closures and accusations. The situation underscores the delicate nature of diplomatic ties even within the same region.

ECOWAS and Mediation in Mali: The Economic Community of West African States (ECOWAS) has played a significant role in mediating political crises, notably in Mali. Diplomatic efforts, including peacekeeping missions and negotiations, aim to stabilize the country and address governance challenges.

SADC and Zimbabwe: The Southern African Development Community (SADC) has been involved in diplomatic efforts related to political and economic challenges in Zimbabwe. Regional leaders engage in dialogues and negotiations to address issues such as governance, human rights, and economic reforms.

African Union and Sudan (Post-2019): The African Union played a role in mediating Sudan's political transition after mass protests led to the ousting of President Omar al-Bashir in 2019. Diplomatic efforts aimed to facilitate a peaceful transition to civilian rule.

Morocco and Western Sahara (AU Readmission): Morocco's readmission to the African Union in 2017 marked a diplomatic shift. While the Western Sahara conflict persists, the decision to readmit Morocco reflected a diplomatic compromise and the recognition of diverse interests within the continent. These examples showcase the diverse nature of diplomatic relations among African states, involving conflicts, resolutions, economic cooperation, regional organizations' interventions, and efforts to address historical disputes. The continent's diplomatic landscape is shaped by a multitude of factors, including historical legacies, economic interests, regional dynamics, and the pursuit of shared goals such as peace and development. While diplomatic relations among African states have witnessed positive developments, challenges persist, including border disputes, historical tensions, and economic inequalities. The ongoing commitment to Pan-African ideals and regional cooperation, however, positions African nations to address these challenges collectively and build a more integrated and prosperous continent (Ian, 2018).

Achievements of African States Diplomatic Relations.

Several achievements mark the diplomatic relations of African states, showcasing their commitment to regional cooperation, conflict resolution, and economic development. Here are notable achievements:

African Union (AU) and Peacekeeping: The AU has played a pivotal role in conflict resolution and peacekeeping efforts across the continent. AU-led missions, such as in Darfur and Somalia, demonstrate collective diplomatic efforts to address security challenges (Huda, 2022).

African Continental Free Trade Area (AfCFTA): The AfCFTA, which came into effect in 2021, is a landmark achievement in economic diplomacy. It aims to create a single market for goods and services, fostering intra-African trade and economic integration.

Resolution of Border Disputes: Diplomatic efforts have led to the resolution of several border disputes between African nations. For example, the International Court of Justice (ICJ) ruling on the Bakassi Peninsula dispute between Nigeria and Cameroon contributed to regional stability.

Ebola Crisis Response: During the Ebola outbreak, African nations collaborated diplomatically to address the crisis. Regional organizations and international partners joined forces to provide aid, share expertise, and coordinate responses to contain the spread of the virus.

Negotiations for Debt Relief: Diplomatic negotiations have resulted in debt relief for some African nations, alleviating economic burdens. Initiatives like the Highly Indebted Poor Countries (HIPC) and the Multilateral Debt Relief Initiative (MDRI) aimed to support economic development.

Diplomatic Mediation in Sudan's Comprehensive Peace Agreement (2005): Diplomatic efforts, including mediation by regional and international actors, contributed to the signing of the Comprehensive Peace Agreement in Sudan in 2005, ending the long-running civil war and leading to the eventual independence of South Sudan in 2011.

Malaria and HIV/AIDS Initiatives: African nations have collaborated diplomatically to address health challenges, such as malaria and HIV/AIDS. Efforts include joint research, sharing best practices, and coordinating with international organizations to combat these diseases.

Diplomatic Engagement in Anti-Piracy Efforts: African nations have engaged in diplomatic efforts to combat piracy off the coast of Somalia. Regional collaborations and international naval missions have contributed to reducing piracy incidents in the region.

Nuclear Disarmament and Non-Proliferation: African states have actively participated in international efforts for nuclear disarmament and non-proliferation. The Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons (TPNW) represents a diplomatic achievement toward global peace and security.

Cultural and Educational Exchanges: Diplomatic relations have facilitated cultural and educational exchanges, fostering mutual understanding among African nations. Initiatives such as student exchange programs and cultural festivals contribute to building stronger diplomatic ties. These achievements demonstrate the proactive diplomatic engagement of African states in addressing challenges, promoting peace and security, and fostering economic and social development (Huda, 2022).

Some Notable Achievements of African states diplomatic milestones since gaining independence in the 1960s.

End of Apartheid in South Africa (1994): Diplomatic efforts, including international sanctions and negotiations, played a crucial role in ending apartheid. South Africa's transition to majority rule in 1994, marked by Nelson Mandela's election as president, showcased successful diplomatic engagement and conflict resolution (Yolanda, 2018).

Peaceful Independence of Namibia (1990): Diplomatic efforts, particularly by the United Nations and neighboring African countries, contributed to Namibia gaining independence from South African rule in 1990. The transition marked the end of a long period of conflict and colonization.

Liberian Civil War Resolution (2003): Diplomatic initiatives, including regional peacekeeping missions and international mediation, contributed to the resolution of the Liberian Civil War. The Comprehensive Peace Agreement in 2003 paved the way for stability and reconstruction.

Successful Mediation in Mozambique (1992): Diplomatic mediation, led by the Community of Sant'egidio and involving international actors, contributed to the peace agreement signed in Rome in 1992, ending the Mozambican Civil War. The accord facilitated the country's recovery and reconstruction.

Ethiopia-Eritrea Peace Agreement (2018): After years of conflict, Ethiopia and Eritrea signed a historic peace agreement in 2018, ending a long-standing border dispute and normalizing diplomatic relations. The reconciliation demonstrated the potential for diplomatic breakthroughs in the region.

Kenya's Diplomatic Role in Somali Peacekeeping: Kenya has played a significant role in regional peacekeeping efforts in Somalia. Its military involvement as part of the African Union Mission in Somalia (AMISOM) aimed to stabilize the country and counter extremist threats.

African Union's Conflict Resolution Efforts: The African Union (AU) has been actively involved in conflict resolution and peacekeeping efforts across the continent. Examples include AU-led peacekeeping missions in Sudan, South Sudan, and Mali, showcasing diplomatic commitment to resolving internal conflicts.

African Continental Free Trade Area (AfCFTA) Agreement (2021): The AfCFTA, which came into effect in 2021, is a landmark diplomatic achievement promoting economic integration across the continent. It aims to create the world's largest free trade area, fostering intra-African trade and economic development.

Climate Change Initiatives: African states have actively participated in international climate change negotiations. Diplomatic efforts have contributed to global agreements, such as the Paris Agreement, where nations commit to addressing climate change and promoting sustainable development. These achievements highlight the diverse diplomatic successes of African states in resolving conflicts, promoting regional stability, fostering economic integration, and addressing global challenges. While challenges persist, these examples underscore the continent's commitment to diplomatic solutions for the benefit of its nations and people. Despite ongoing challenges, these successes showcase the continent's commitment to collaborative solutions and regional cooperation (Yolanda, 2018).

Challenges of African States Diplomatic Relations

African states face various challenges in their diplomatic relations, reflecting the complexity of the continent's geopolitical landscape. Here are some notable challenges:

Conflict and Instability: Persistent conflicts within and between African nations pose a significant diplomatic challenge. Ongoing tensions, political instability, and armed conflicts can strain relations and hinder diplomatic efforts.

Border Disputes: Historical border demarcations, often established during the colonial era, can lead to territorial disputes. Resolving these issues diplomatically requires careful negotiation and mutual agreement, which can be a lengthy and complex process.

Economic Inequalities: Economic disparities among African nations can create challenges in diplomatic relations. Issues related to trade imbalances, unequal development, and differing economic interests may strain cooperative efforts (John, 2016).

Human Rights Concerns: Instances of human rights abuses can strain diplomatic relations. Balancing the promotion of human rights with respect for national sovereignty is a delicate diplomatic challenge (John, 2016).

Corruption and Governance Issues: Corruption and governance challenges in some African nations can impact diplomatic relations. Transparency, accountability, and good governance are crucial elements for building trust in international interactions.

Health Crises and Pandemics: Health crises, such as the Ebola outbreak and the COVID-19 pandemic, pose diplomatic challenges. Coordinating responses, sharing resources, and ensuring equitable access to vaccines require effective international collaboration.

Climate Change Impacts: Environmental challenges, exacerbated by climate change, can strain diplomatic relations. Issues like water scarcity, desertification, and displacement due to climate-related events may require regional cooperation and diplomatic solutions  (John, 2016).

Resource Management and Competition: Competition over natural resources, including water, minerals, and arable land, can lead to diplomatic tensions. Managing these resources sustainably and equitably is a diplomatic challenge  (John, 2016).

Migration and Refugee Crises: Forced migration and refugee crises can strain diplomatic relations, especially when neighboring countries are impacted. Coordinating humanitarian responses and addressing the root causes require diplomatic collaboration.

Terrorism and Transnational Crime: The rise of terrorism and transnational crime poses security challenges. Diplomatic efforts are needed to address the root causes, strengthen regional security cooperation, and counter extremist threats.

Global Power Dynamics: Global power dynamics, including the influence of major powers in Africa, can impact diplomatic relations. Balancing relationships with various international actors while safeguarding national interests is a diplomatic challenge.

Pandemics and Health Crises: Events like the COVID-19 pandemic have strained diplomatic relations due to travel restrictions, vaccine distribution challenges, and economic disruptions. Coordinating responses and ensuring access to healthcare resources require international collaboration  (John, 2016).

Some practical examples that illustrate the challenges that African states faces in their diplomatic relations

Border Disputes between Ethiopia and Sudan (2020): Ethiopia and Sudan experienced tensions over a longstanding border dispute in the al-Fashaga region. The disagreement highlighted the complexities of resolving historical territorial issues and the potential for diplomatic strains.

Nigerian-Ghanaian Trade Disputes (2020): Nigeria and Ghana faced diplomatic tensions related to trade disputes, including issues regarding retail trade regulations and the closure of Nigerian-owned shops in Ghana. Economic disagreements can strain diplomatic ties and require negotiations for resolution.

Ethiopia-Egypt-Sudan Nile River Dam Dispute (Ongoing): The Grand Ethiopian Renaissance Dam (GERD) project has led to diplomatic tensions between Ethiopia, Egypt, and Sudan. The management of the Nile River's waters and the potential impact on downstream countries illustrate the complexity of water resource diplomacy.

Kenya-Somalia Maritime Dispute (Ongoing): Kenya and Somalia have been involved in a diplomatic dispute over maritime boundaries, particularly in the Indian Ocean. The disagreement has strained relations and resulted in legal proceedings at the International Court of Justice (ICJ).

Crisis in the Central African Republic (CAR): The ongoing conflict in CAR has created diplomatic challenges. Regional and international efforts to address the crisis require delicate negotiations, peacekeeping initiatives, and cooperation among neighboring states.

Allegations of Meddling in Internal Affairs (Various Instances): Accusations of meddling in internal affairs, including allegations of interference in elections or supporting opposition movements, have strained diplomatic relations between African states. Such instances highlight the sensitivity surrounding sovereignty and external influence.

South Sudan's Internal Conflicts and Regional Implications: South Sudan's internal conflicts have had regional implications, with neighboring countries being affected by refugee flows and security concerns. Diplomatic efforts to address the root causes of the conflicts and promote stability in the region are ongoing.

Terrorism and Security Challenges (e.g., Boko Haram): Terrorism, as seen with groups like Boko Haram in West Africa, poses regional security challenges. Diplomatic collaboration is crucial to coordinate efforts in combating extremism and addressing the root causes of terrorism.

Mozambique Insurgency (Ongoing): The insurgency in northern Mozambique has created regional security challenges. The diplomatic response involves collaboration with neighboring countries and international partners to address the threat and support stability in the region.

Western Sahara Conflict (Ongoing): The Western Sahara conflict involving Morocco, the Polisario Front, and Algeria remains a diplomatic challenge. Disputes over sovereignty and self-determination continue to impact regional relations in North Africa. These examples underscore the diverse range of diplomatic challenges faced by African states, including border disputes, trade tensions, internal conflicts, and regional security concerns. Diplomatic solutions often require sustained efforts, multilateral collaboration, and adherence to international norms and agreements. Addressing these challenges requires skillful diplomacy, regional cooperation, and a commitment to finding sustainable solutions. African states continue to work towards overcoming these obstacles to promote peace, stability, and development on the continent (John, 2016).

Foreign Policies of African States

The foreign policies of African states are diverse and shaped by various factors, including historical legacies, regional dynamics, economic interests, and global partnerships. While each country's foreign policy is unique, there are some common themes and objectives across the continent:

Pan-Africanism: Many African states emphasize Pan-Africanism, advocating for unity and solidarity among African nations. This involves collaboration on continental issues, supporting regional organizations, and working towards common goals, such as peace and development.

Economic Diplomacy: Economic interests play a crucial role in African foreign policies. States often seek foreign investments, trade partnerships, and economic cooperation to foster development and address challenges related to poverty and unemployment.

Regional Integration: African countries actively engage in regional integration efforts, forming organizations such as the African Union (AU), the Economic Community of West African States (ECOWAS), and the Southern African Development Community (SADC). These platforms aim to enhance cooperation, economic integration, and political stability within regions.

Peacekeeping and Conflict Resolution: Many African states contribute troops to international peacekeeping missions and engage in diplomatic efforts to resolve conflicts within the continent. Promoting peace and stability is a central aspect of foreign policies, both regionally and globally.

Human Rights and Democracy: African states, despite challenges, often express commitment to human rights and democratic governance in their foreign policies. Engaging with international organizations and adhering to global norms on human rights are common objectives.

Health Diplomacy: Diplomatic efforts in the health sector involve collaboration on issues such as disease prevention, healthcare infrastructure development, and responses to pandemics. This has become particularly significant in the face of global health challenges, such as HIV/AIDS and recent pandemics like COVID-19.

Climate Change and Environmental Diplomacy: Many African states actively engage in global discussions on climate change, advocating for sustainable development practices, adaptation strategies, and climate justice. Diplomatic efforts in this realm aim to address environmental challenges and promote sustainable development.

Cultural and Educational Exchanges: Cultural and educational diplomacy fosters mutual understanding and people-to-people connections. African countries participate in exchange programs, collaborative research initiatives, and cultural events to strengthen diplomatic ties.

Non-Aligned Movement (NAM) Principles: Some African states adhere to the principles of non-alignment, seeking to maintain independence and not aligning with major power blocs. This approach is rooted in historical struggles against colonialism and imperialism.

South-South Cooperation: African nations often engage in South-South cooperation, collaborating with other developing nations, particularly in Asia and Latin America. This involves sharing experiences, knowledge, and resources to address common challenges.

Anti-Colonial and Anti-Imperialist Stance: Foreign policies of African states frequently reflect a commitment to anti-colonial and anti-imperialist principles, emphasizing sovereignty, self-determination, and the rectification of historical injustices. While these general themes characterize the foreign policies of many African states, it's essential to know that there is diversity among nations, each with its unique geopolitical context, priorities, and diplomatic challenges (Olajide, 1977).

Impacts of Decolonisation on Foreign Policies and Diplomacy of African States

The impacts of decolonization on the foreign policies and diplomacy of African states have been profound, shaping their interactions on the global stage. Here are several key factors that highlight these impacts:

Emergence of Sovereign States:

Decolonization resulted in the establishment of sovereign African states, each with its own foreign policy objectives. The end of colonial rule allowed these nations to define their own diplomatic priorities, engage in international relations independently, and shape their global identities.

Shift in Global Power Dynamics: The decolonization process contributed to a shift in global power dynamics. Newly independent African states sought to assert their influence and advocate for the principles of equality and justice in international relations. This shift influenced diplomatic alignments and alliances.

Pan-Africanism and Regional Cooperation: The ideals of Pan-Africanism gained prominence post-decolonization. African states recognized the importance of unity and cooperation in addressing common challenges. Regional organizations like the Organization of African Unity (OAU) and later the African Union (AU) emerged to facilitate collective diplomatic efforts.

Non-Aligned Movement (NAM) Participation: Many African states, inspired by the principles of NAM, pursued non-alignment in the Cold War context. They sought to avoid alignment with major power blocs, emphasizing independence and non-interference in internal affairs. This stance influenced diplomatic relations and partnerships.

Peacekeeping and Conflict Resolution: With the end of colonial rule, African nations engaged in peacekeeping missions and diplomatic efforts to address internal and regional conflicts. Diplomacy became a tool for conflict resolution, and African nations actively contributed troops to international peacekeeping missions.

Economic Diplomacy and Development Goals: Independent African states developed their economic diplomacy strategies, seeking foreign investments, trade partnerships, and development assistance. Foreign policies became instrumental in fostering economic growth, reducing poverty, and addressing developmental challenges.

Cultural Diplomacy and Identity Promotion: African nations used diplomacy to promote their cultural identity and heritage on the global stage. Cultural exchanges, participation in international events, and the establishment of cultural centers abroad became means to enhance soft power and influence.

Human Rights Advocacy: African states, having experienced colonial oppression, became advocates for human rights on the international stage. Diplomatic efforts included engagement with international organizations to address human rights abuses globally and promote principles of justice and equality.

Environmental and Climate Diplomacy: In response to global environmental challenges, African states engaged in diplomatic efforts related to climate change and sustainable development. This included participation in international forums, advocating for environmental justice, and addressing the impacts of climate change on the continent.

Representation in International Organizations:

Decolonization allowed African states to take their place in international organizations such as the United Nations. These platforms provided opportunities for African nations to voice their concerns, influence global agendas, and contribute to the development of international norms.

Challenges of Neocolonialism: Despite decolonization, some African nations faced challenges related to neocolonialism, wherein external powers continued to exert influence through economic means. Managing these challenges became a diplomatic priority for many African states.

However, decolonization significantly impacted the foreign policies and diplomacy of African states, providing them with opportunities to assert their sovereignty, advocate for their interests, and contribute to global affairs. While challenges persist, the post-colonial era has seen African nations actively engaging in diplomatic initiatives to shape their destinies and address pressing issues on the world stage (Donald, 1970).

Impacts of Foreign Policies and Diplomacy of African States on the Occurrence of Decolonisation in Africa.

The foreign policies and diplomacy of African states played a crucial role in the process of decolonization on the continent. Here are key impacts and contributions:

Diplomatic Mobilization for Independence: African states engaged in diplomatic efforts to garner international support for the decolonization process. Leaders like Kwame Nkrumah of Ghana, Jomo Kenyatta of Kenya, and Nnamdi Azikiwe of Nigeria were instrumental in building alliances and advocating for the independence of their nations on the global stage.

United Front Against Colonialism: African nations, recognizing the common struggle against colonialism, formed a united front in international forums. The Bandung Conference in 1955, attended by several African and Asian nations, exemplified diplomatic cooperation in demanding an end to colonial rule and promoting self-determination.

Role of the United Nations: African states actively participated in the United Nations (UN), leveraging diplomatic forums to bring attention to colonial injustices. The UN's role in overseeing the decolonization process, as outlined in Chapter XI of the Charter, provided a diplomatic platform for addressing colonial grievances.

Anti-Colonial Diplomacy at International Forums: African leaders used platforms like the UN General Assembly to articulate the anti-colonial sentiments of their nations. Speeches and resolutions emphasized the right to self-determination, contributing to the diplomatic momentum for decolonization.

Negotiations and Diplomatic Pressure:

Diplomatic negotiations with colonial powers were a critical aspect of the decolonization process. African leaders engaged in dialogue, often applying diplomatic pressure through international forums, to secure agreements that led to the transfer of power and independence.

Support for Liberation Movements:

African states extended diplomatic support to liberation movements in territories still under colonial rule. For instance, during the struggle against apartheid in South Africa, African nations diplomatically supported the anti-apartheid movement and called for international sanctions against the regime.

Establishment of Regional Organizations:

Regional organizations, such as the Organization of African Unity (OAU), were established to promote solidarity and coordinate diplomatic efforts among African nations. The OAU played a significant role in supporting decolonization and addressing post-colonial challenges.

Legal Challenges and International Law: African states utilized international law and legal forums to challenge the legitimacy of colonial rule. Cases brought before the International Court of Justice (ICJ) and other legal mechanisms provided a diplomatic avenue to contest colonial practices.

Economic Diplomacy for Independence: African leaders engaged in economic diplomacy to secure financial and trade support that would contribute to the economic viability of their newly independent nations. Establishing economic ties and securing investments became crucial diplomatic endeavors.

Post-Independence Diplomacy: After gaining independence, African states continued to use diplomacy to navigate the challenges of statehood. This included establishing diplomatic relations with other nations, participating in international organizations, and addressing legacies of colonialism through reparations and reconciliation efforts.

Promotion of African Identity and Unity: Diplomacy was used to promote African identity and unity. Leaders advocated for a shared African consciousness, emphasizing common heritage and the need for collective action to address challenges.

Thus, the foreign policies and diplomatic initiatives of African states were pivotal in the decolonization process. By mobilizing international support, engaging in negotiations, and leveraging diplomatic forums, African leaders successfully navigated the complex path toward independence and laid the groundwork for a new era of sovereignty and self-determination on the continent (Okoth, 1989).

 

Conclusion

In conclusion, the foreign policies and diplomacy of African states played a transformative and instrumental role in the process of decolonization from 1950 to 1990. This period marked a significant shift in global dynamics as African nations sought to free themselves from colonial rule and establish independent sovereign states. The impacts of foreign policies and diplomatic initiatives during this era were profound and multifaceted. The foreign policies and diplomacy of African states played a pivotal role in the process of decolonization from 1950 to 1990. These nations strategically navigated the complex web of international relations to assert their sovereignty and break free from colonial rule. Through diplomatic channels, African leaders engaged in negotiations, alliances, and international forums to garner support for their decolonization efforts. The Bandung Conference of 1955 marked a significant moment in shaping a collective identity among newly independent African states and fostering solidarity in their pursuit of self-determination.

Furthermore, the Non-Aligned Movement emerged as a diplomatic strategy, allowing African nations to maintain autonomy amid Cold War tensions. By skillfully utilizing both Western and Eastern blocs, African leaders sought economic assistance and political backing to bolster their decolonization agendas. The diplomatic endeavors of figures like Kwame Nkrumah, Julius Nyerere, and Gamal Abdel Nasser showcased the diversity of approaches employed by African nations, ranging from pan-Africanism to non-alignment. Economic diplomacy also played a crucial role, as African leaders sought to establish economic frameworks that would ensure self-sufficiency and reduce dependence on former colonial powers. The establishment of regional organizations like the Organization of African Unity (OAU) reflected a commitment to fostering continental unity and addressing common challenges collectively.

Despite the successes, challenges persisted, with the intricacies of global power dynamics influencing the pace and scope of decolonization. Neocolonial forces and economic pressures continued to shape the trajectory of newly independent African nations. In essence, the foreign policies and diplomatic maneuvers of African states during this period were both multifaceted and impactful, shaping the contours of a post-colonial Africa and leaving a lasting legacy on the geopolitical landscape.

In essence, the foreign policies and diplomacy of African states during the decolonization period were characterized by a strategic blend of advocacy, negotiation, and international collaboration. Through these diplomatic efforts, African nations successfully dismantled colonial structures, reclaimed their sovereignty, and set the stage for a new era in which they actively participated in shaping the global political landscape. The impacts of this diplomatic endeavor resonated far beyond the immediate post-colonial period, laying the foundation for the diverse and dynamic continent that Africa represents today.

References

1.      Abdurahmanli E. (2021), Definition of Diplomacy and Types of Diplomacy used Between states, Ch 2&3 pp. 4-10 & 14-17.

2.      Adaye O. (2006). A History of European Diplomacy Ch 2 pp. 31 & 41.

3.      Avar Y. (2016). The Development of Inter-StateRelations and the History of Diplomacy. Tuic Academy, Ch 2 pp. 13.

4.      Baston P. (1988), Modern Diplomacy, London Printing Press Ch 4 pp. 65 & 67.

5.      Boyer M. (2021). Moving Targets: Understanding Diplomacy and Negotiation in a Globalizing System: International Studies Review 3: Ch 7 pp.91 & 93.

6.      Bariagaber A. (2019), International Relations of African States available at https://scholarship.shu.edu/ accessed on 24th February, 2024.

7.      Britannica (2021), Decolonization available at https://www.britannica.com/ accessed on 24th February, 2024.

8.      Donald R. (1970), African Federation and the Diplomacy of Decolonisation available at https://jstor.org/stable/ accessed on 25th February, 2024.

9.      Huda D. (2022), African Diplomacy Issues and Challenges available at https://journal/ppw.com/ accessed on 24th February, 2024.

10.  Ian T. (2018), Africa’s International Relations available at https://doi.org/ accessed on https://academic.out.com/ accessed on 24th February, 2024.

11.  John A. (2016), The Challenges of Diplomatic practice in African States available at https://www.researchgate.net/publication/ accessed on 23rd February, 2024.

12.  Martin W. (2021), Decolonization and Liberation available at https://www.cambridge.org/ accessed on 24th February, 2024.

13.  Myrice, E. (2015), The Impact of the Second World War on the Decolonization of Africa, Africana Studies Student Research Conference. 2. Available at https://scholarworks.bgsu.edu/africana_studies_conf/2015/004/2

14.  Nicolson H. (1979).Transition from Old to New Diplomacy in Elmer Plischke (Ed) Modern Diplomacy. The Art and Artisans, Washington Ch 3 pp. 50.

15.  Okoth P.G (1989), The African Style of Foreign Policy: Instruments of Diplomacy, Vol 16, No. 1/2, pp. 60-61.

16.  Olajide A. (1977), The Foreign Policies of African States available at https://www.rienner.com/ accessed on 25th February, 2025.

17.  University of York (2022), What is Foreign Policy available at https://online.York.ac.ur/what-is-foreign-policy/ accessed on 17th February, 2024.

18.  Yolanda S. (2018), African Diplomacy available at https://www.researchgate.net/publication/ accessed on 25th February, 2024.