Cite this article as: Akpere, G. E. (2026). Ideology and narrative technique in Kaine Agary'sYellow-Yellow: A critical stylistic approach. Sokoto Journal of Linguistics and Communication Studies (SOJOLICS), 2(2), 412-419. https://doi.org/10.36349/sojolics.2026.v02i02.038
By
Akpere, Geraldine
Erhieyovwe
Delta State Polytechnic,
Otefe-Oghara,
+2347037632366
Abstract
This study examines
environmental exploitation and its socio-economic consequences in Kaine Agary’s
Yellow-Yellow (2006) using Lesley Jeffries’s Critical Stylistics, particularly
the tool of Presenting Others’ Speech and Thought. It analyses ten selected
excerpts to show how speech and thought presentation shapes meaning and guides
reader interpretation of life in the Niger Delta. Findings reveal that Agary
uses shifts in speech modes to contrast suffering with institutional neglect,
highlighting environmental injustice and marginalisation. The study
demonstrates that these linguistic choices are ideologically driven and
position readers toward critical awareness of power imbalances and ecological
degradation.
Keywords: Ideology, environmental exploitation, Critical Stylistics,
speech and thought presentation, narrative technique, Lesley Jeffries
1. Introduction
Environmental
exploitation in the Niger Delta has generated far-reaching ecological and
socio-economic challenges, attracting considerable attention from scholars and
creative writers. Kaine Agary’s Yellow-Yellow (2006) explores
these realities through the experiences of characters whose lives are shaped by
environmental degradation and social marginalisation. While existing studies
have examined the novel from ecocritical and socio-political perspectives,
limited attention has been paid to how its linguistic and narrative choices
construct these concerns. This study therefore investigates how speech and
thought presentation in the novel contributes to the representation of
environmental exploitation and its socio-economic consequences using Lesley
Jeffries’s Critical Stylistics.
2. Literature Review
It is widely recognised
that meaning is constructed through language in both literary and non-literary
texts (Bamgbose, 1995, p. 27). Daramola (2019) similarly notes that language
functions as a meaning-making system shaped by context, participants, and culture.
In literary studies, this supports the view that literature reflects social
realities through linguistic representation (Taufik, 2017; Muzakki, 2011;
Nurhamidah et al., 2019). However, such representation is not neutral, as
stylistic choices influence how these realities are presented and interpreted.
Akhter (2020) therefore argues that literature both reflects and shapes social
perception through ideological use of language.
Critical Stylistics
extends traditional stylistic inquiry by examining how textual patterns encode
ideological meanings and construct social reality (Jeffries, 2010). Unlike
traditional stylistics, which focuses on describing textual features, it
interrogates how such features shape ideology. It integrates stylistics and
Critical Discourse Analysis to uncover how language encodes power and meaning
in texts (Al-Zubaidi & Al-Mamoori, 2023). Among its tools, Presenting
Others’ Speech and Thought is particularly relevant, as it shows how reported
speech and thought position voices, construct credibility, and guide
interpretation through direct, indirect, and free indirect discourse.
Jeffries (2010)
categorises speech and thought presentation into five main types: direct, free
indirect, indirect, narrator’s report, and narrator’s report of act, each with
speech and thought variants such as Direct Speech (DS), Direct Thought (DT),
Free Indirect Speech (FIS), Free Indirect Thought (FIT), Indirect Speech (IS),
and Indirect Thought (IT). Kaine Agary’s Yellow-Yellow (2006),
set in the Niger Delta, follows Zilayefa and depicts how environmental
degradation and oil exploitation shape poverty, survival struggles, and social
decay. Critics generally agree that the novel foregrounds the destructive
consequences of environmental exploitation (Oseghale, 2019; Adewunmi, 2022;
Ubah et al., 2024). This study therefore examines how speech and thought
presentation constructs these ideological meanings in the novel.
3. Methodology
This study adopts a
qualitative research design in analysing the representation of environmental
exploitation and its socio-economic consequences in Kaine Agary’sYellow-Yellow (2006).
Data for the study consist of ten purposively selected excerpts drawn from
different parts of the novel based on their relevance to issues of
environmental degradation and socio-economic realities in the Niger Delta.
Using textual analysis, the excerpts were examined through Lesley Jeffries’s
Critical Stylistics, specifically the textual-conceptual function Presenting
Others’ Speech and Thought. The excerpts were coded according to various forms
of speech and thought presentation, including Direct Speech, Free Indirect
Speech, Indirect Speech, Narrator’s Report of Speech, Narrator’s Report of
Speech Act, Direct Thought, Free Indirect Thought, Indirect Thought, Narrator’s
Report of Thought, and Narrator’s Report of Thought Act, to facilitate a systematic
analysis of how linguistic choices construct meanings related to environmental
exploitation and its socio-economic impact.
4. Theoretical Framework
This study is anchored
on Lesley Jeffries’s Critical Stylistics, a theory developed to investigate how
ideology is embedded in language. Jeffries (2010) developed the framework to
bridge the gap between traditional stylistics, which focuses on textual description,
and Critical Discourse Analysis, which is concerned with ideology and power.
The theory assumes that language is not neutral; rather, it shapes how readers
perceive people, events, and social realities. Thus, textual choices are viewed
as ideological choices that influence meaning and interpretation (Jeffries
& McIntyre, 2010).
A key feature of
Critical Stylistics is its use of textual-conceptual functions, which provide
systematic tools for analysing how meanings are constructed in texts. This
study adopts the function Presenting Others’ Speech and Thought, which examines
the different ways narrators represent characters’ speech, thoughts, and
perceptions. According to Jeffries (2010), the choice between direct, indirect,
and narrator-mediated forms of presentation is ideologically significant
because it determines the degree of prominence, authority, and credibility
given to particular voices. Al-Zubaidi and Al-Mamoori (2023) therefore argue
that the framework is effective in uncovering implicit meanings and assumptions
embedded in discourse.
The relevance of this
theory to the present study lies in its ability to reveal how linguistic
choices construct social realities within literary texts. By analysing the
presentation of speech and thought in Yellow-Yellow, the
framework makes it possible to examine how experiences of environmental
exploitation and socio-economic hardship are represented and interpreted.
Critical Stylistics therefore provides a suitable analytical lens for
uncovering the ideological meanings embedded in the novel's portrayal of
environmental degradation and its consequences in the Niger Delta.
5. Data Presentation and Analysis
|
S/N |
Type |
Chapter |
Example |
Explanation |
Ideological Effect |
|
1 |
Direct Speech (DS) |
Ch. 8 |
“Abeg, let us talk about better
things… these people… will not send me to my grave with hypertension.” |
Expresses frustration and
emotional stress caused by socio-environmental conditions. |
Constructs environmental and
socio-political space as psychologically oppressive, showing how everyday
discourse reflects systemic stress. |
|
2 |
Free Indirect Speech (FIS) |
Ch. 4 |
“I had so desperately believed
that he would take me away with him…” |
Merges narrator and character
voice to show illusion of escape and constrained reality. |
Reveals ideology of entrapment,
where aspirations are shaped and limited by socio-economic deprivation. |
|
3 |
Indirect Speech (IS) |
Ch. 2 |
“The word around the village was
that the police had caught and killed them…” |
Shows reliance on rumours due to
weak institutional communication systems. |
Constructs state institutions as
unreliable, reinforcing mistrust and marginalisation of rural communities. |
|
4 |
Narrator’s Report of Speech (NRS) |
Ch. 2 |
“My mother used to tell me that I
would be better than her.” |
Reflects maternal hope shaped by
socio-economic hardship. |
Projects ideology of upward
mobility as fragile and aspirational under structural inequality. |
|
5 |
Narrator’s Report of Speech Act
(NRSA) |
Ch. 4 |
“He willingly gave me the vessels
that took me into new villages…” |
Symbolises education/books as a
means of escape from hardship. |
Constructs education as symbolic
capital for escape, highlighting unequal access to empowerment resources. |
|
6 |
Direct Thought (DT) |
Ch. 2 |
“I just wanted to leave the
village. The sameness of life… would kill me…” |
Reveals inner desire for escape
from environmental and social stagnation. |
Reflects internalised ideology of
rural deprivation as suffocating and unlivable. |
|
7 |
Free Indirect Thought (FIT) |
Ch. 2 |
“Perchance in saving me, she hoped
to save herself.” |
Reflects intergenerational hope
for liberation from economic hardship. |
Shows ideology of survival
transfer, where personal salvation is tied to family escape from deprivation. |
|
8 |
Indirect Thought (IT) |
Ch. 3 |
“I started to consider options
that had never crossed my mind before…” |
Shows moral conflict and
desperation shaped by poverty and deprivation. |
Reveals ideology of economic
pressure driving moral instability and alternative survival strategies. |
|
9 |
Narrator’s Report of Thought (NRT) |
Ch. 1 |
“And so it was that, in a single
day, my mother lost her main source of sustenance.” |
Summarises awareness of
environmental destruction and its economic impact. |
Frames environmental degradation
as direct economic violence against livelihoods. |
|
10 |
Narrator’s Report of Thought Act
(NRTA) |
Ch. 1 |
“Not unlike the way she and
others… had gradually lost the creatures of the river to oil spills…” |
Represents collective realization
of environmental degradation affecting livelihood. |
Constructs ecological destruction
as normalized systemic loss, embedding ideology of environmental
exploitation. |
6. Discussion of Findings
The analysis of speech
and thought presentation in Kaine Agary’sYellow-Yellow reveals that
linguistic choices are not merely narrative techniques but ideological
instruments through which environmental injustice and socio-economic
marginalisation are constructed and reinforced. Across the ten extracts, it is
evident that different forms of speech and thought presentation consistently
mediate the reader’s access to experience in ways that foreground the harsh
realities of life in the Niger Delta. Rather than simply reporting events, the
narrative strategically positions voices of authority, vulnerability, and
resistance, thereby shaping how readers interpret the socio-environmental
context of the text. This aligns with Jeffries’ (2010) position that textual
choices are inherently ideological, as they influence how reality is represented
and understood.
Direct Speech, as seen in Extract 1, foregrounds
emotional immediacy and subjective distress, allowing characters to openly
articulate frustration with socio-political conditions. The expression of
hypertension as a consequence of societal stress symbolically links
environmental degradation with physical and psychological suffering.
Ideologically, this presentation constructs the environment not merely as a
backdrop but as an active force of oppression affecting human health and
wellbeing. In this way, direct speech amplifies individual voice, but this
voice is embedded within a wider structure of environmental injustice. Free
Indirect Speech (Extract 2) operates more subtly by merging narrator and
character perspectives, thereby blurring boundaries between lived experience
and narrative commentary. The illusion of escape in Extract 2 reveals
ideological entrapment, where aspirations for mobility are constantly
undermined by socio-economic constraints. This blending of voices creates a
psychological depth that exposes the internalisation of limitation, suggesting
that environmental degradation does not only affect external conditions but
also shapes imagination and desire. In this sense, free indirect speech becomes
a tool for illustrating how ideology penetrates consciousness, reinforcing
feelings of inevitability and constrained mobility.
Indirect Speech (Extract 3) introduces a layer of
narrative distance, which is ideologically significant because it filters
events through reported discourse. The circulation of rumours about police
killings highlights institutional failure and the absence of trustworthy
communication systems, thereby constructing a reality of uncertainty and fear.
By reporting rather than directly quoting these utterances, the narrative
reinforces the power imbalance between authoritative institutions and
marginalised communities, suggesting that institutional voices dominate
discourse while community voices are mediated and weakened. Narrator’s Report
of Speech (Extract 4) further consolidates ideological meaning by summarising
spoken discourse, often stripping it of emotional immediacy. The mother’s hope
that her daughter would be better than her reflects generational aspiration
shaped by socio-economic hardship. This summary constructs hope as both
resilient and fragile within conditions of structural inequality.
Ideologically, it suggests that aspirations for social mobility continue to
exist despite persistent socio-economic deprivation in the Niger Delta.
Narrator’s Report of Speech Act (Extract 5) shifts
attention from what is said to what is done, emphasising actions as symbolic
representations of ideological meaning. The act of giving books represents
education as a potential means of escape from environmental hardship,
positioning knowledge as a liberating force. This narrative act constructs
ideology at the level of behaviour, suggesting that opportunities for
advancement are mediated by environmental and economic constraints.
Turning to thought representation, Direct Thought
(Extract 6) provides unmediated access to the protagonist's inner desire for
escape. This immediacy intensifies the ideological effect by revealing how
environmental stagnation produces psychological suffocation. The village is not
merely a physical space but a site of constraint that shapes cognitive and
emotional states. Direct thought therefore exposes the internalisation of
deprivation as a lived psychological experience. Free Indirect Thought (Extract
7) deepens this ideological layering by merging narrator and character
consciousness, suggesting that survival itself is imagined as collective
salvation. The mother's hope becomes a symbolic representation of generational
struggle, reinforcing the idea that individual futures are inseparable from
environmental conditions. This presentation reveals how personal aspirations
are shaped by wider socio-economic realities.
Indirect Thought (Extract 8) further demonstrates how
ideology operates through mediated cognition. The contemplation of previously
unthinkable options signals moral and social destabilisation caused by poverty.
The distance created by indirect thought highlights how desperation is not
spontaneous but socially constructed, emerging from sustained deprivation. It
therefore reinforces the relationship between environmental hardship and the
difficult choices imposed by economic realities. Narrator’s Report of Thought
(Extract 9) compresses awareness of environmental destruction into a concise
narrative statement, reinforcing the inevitability of loss. By summarising the
mother's loss of her means of livelihood, the narrative presents environmental
degradation as a direct source of economic hardship. This form of thought
representation foregrounds the far-reaching consequences of ecological
destruction on everyday existence. Narrator’s Report of Thought Act (Extract
10) generalises collective awareness of ecological devastation affecting
livelihoods. By referring to the gradual loss of the river's resources through
oil spills, the narrative presents environmental destruction as a shared and
normalised experience within the community. Together, these forms present
environmental degradation as both experienced and cognitively internalised,
shaping how individuals and communities interpret their realities.
In effect, the findings demonstrate that speech and
thought presentation in Yellow-Yellow functions as a powerful
ideological mechanism through which environmental degradation, poverty, and
social marginalisation are constructed. The alternation between directness,
mediation, and summarisation is not stylistically neutral; rather, it shapes reader
alignment with suffering, resilience, and constrained hope. The narrative thus
constructs a layered ideological reality in which environmental exploitation is
shown to permeate not only physical spaces but also language, thought, and
perception.
7. Conclusion
This study concludes
that the various forms of speech and thought presentation in Kaine Agary’sYellow-Yellow play
significant roles in conveying the novel’s ideological concerns surrounding
environmental degradation and its socio-economic consequences in the Niger
Delta. Through the strategic use of Direct Speech, Free Indirect Speech,
Indirect Speech, and the different narrator-reporting modes, the narrative
constructs and reinforces the lived realities of individuals and communities
affected by environmental exploitation. These techniques collectively highlight
the emotional, psychological, and social dimensions of suffering while
foregrounding issues of marginalisation, inequality, and limited opportunity.
Succinctly, the analysis demonstrates that Agary’s narrative choices are not
merely stylistic but function as ideological tools that shape reader perception
and deepen understanding of the text’s central concerns.
8. References
Abioye, T.,
&Ajoboye, E. (2014). Lexico-stylistic analysis of Kaine Agary’s Yellow-
Yellow. Journal of African Studies, 10(2), 3-12.
Adewunmi, O. (2022).
Environmental degradation and social justice in Agary’s Yellow -Yellow. African
Eco-literature Review, 15(4), 145-161.
Agary, K. (2006). Yellow-
Yellow. Dtalkshop.
Akhter, F. (2020).
Literature as a mirror of society. Journal of Social Science and
Humanities, 5(8), 2225-2232. https://doi.org/10.36765/jssh.2020.5860
Al-Zubaidi, S., &
Al-Mamoori, L. (2023). Critical stylistics in discourse: Jeffries’s approach to
social meaning in texts. Language and Literature Journal, 15(1),
59-64. https://doi.org/10.31235/osf.io/je4vb
Bamgbose, A.
(1995). Language and the nation: The language question in sub-Saharan
Africa. Edinburgh University Press.
Daramola, A. (2019). The
English Language in Nigeria as Discourses of Life and Death. An Inaugural
Lecture Delivered at the J. F. Ade Ajayi Auditorium, University of Lagos. Inagural
Lecture Series 2019. University of Lagos Press and Bookshop Limited.
Ibeneche, C.,
&Ogwuru, N. (2021). Ecocritical perspectives on Niger Delta narratives: A
case study of Kaine Agary’s Yellow -Yellow. Nigerian
Ecocriticism Journal, 12(2), 67-82.
Jeffries, L.
(2010). Critical stylistics: The power of English. Palgrave
Macmillan.
Jeffries, L., &
McIntyre, D. (2010). Stylistics and the study of literature: A guide for
students. Language and Literature Journal, 7(3), 59-68.
https://doi.org/10.1080/1740590090342010
Muzakki, A. (2011).
Literature as a socio-cultural tool. Journal of Literary Studies,
3(4), 327-341. https://doi.org/10.11588/jls.2011.34.327
Nurhamidah, S., et al.
(2019). Literary texts as cultural mirrors. International Journal of
Cultural Studies, 12(2), 145-158. https://doi.org/10.4324/ijcs.2019.122145
Oseghale, A. (2019).
Environmental injustice in Kaine Agary’sYellow -Yellow. Journal
of African Ecocriticism, 9(3), 98-109.
Scott, M. (2013).
Reader-response theory and stylistics. Linguistics and Literature
Review, 8(2), 201-215. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444813487321
Taufik, S. (2017). The
reflection of social realities in literature. Journal of Cultural
Studies, 5(2), 211-225. https://doi.org/10.1163/jcs.2017.52.211
Ubah, I., Adewoye, L.,
& Salami, J. (2024). Economic and environmental critiques in Yellow-
Yellow. Journal of Postcolonial Literature, 29(2), 35-50.
Ufoma, A. (2023). The
intersections of ecofeminism and environmental justice in Kaine Agary’sYellow
-Yellow. Feminist Studies in African Literature, 7(2), 223-241.
Verdonk, P.
(2002). Stylistics. Oxford University Press.
0 Comments