Cite this article as: Gadaka, M. U. (2026). Cultural negotiation in Arab Western diaspora and the images of self-orientalism in Leila Aboulela’s Bird Summons. Sokoto Journal of Linguistics and Communication Studies (SOJOLICS), 2(1), 451-462. https://doi.org/10.36349/sojolics.2026.v02i01.037
By
Mohammed Umar Gadaka,
Ph.D.
Department of English and Literary Studies
University of Maiduguri
umarmg77@gmail.com; gadaka77@unimaid.edu.ng
Abstract
Rooted in Edward Said’s
theorization of Orientalism, this paper is concerned with the literary
representations of the phenomenon of Self-Orientalism in Oriental literature.
Self-Orientalism is a situation where Oriental subjects internalize and
self-inscribe Orientalistsdistorted knowledge of the Orient and participate in
the construction, reinforcement and dissemination of Orientalist discourse
through their literary pieces and other forms of cultural expressions, in a bid
to conform to Western cultures. Literary representation of Self-Orientalism
perpetuates subservience to Western narratives, reinforces harmful stereotypes
and promotes the intellectual, cultural, economic and political domination of
the Orient that colonialism left behind. This study aimed to examine the
manifestations of Self-Orientalism in Leila Aboulela’s Bird Summons. To this
end, the study conducted a contrapuntal reading of the text using the four
principal dogmas of Orientalism as analytical framework to highlight the
manifestations of self-Orientalist tropes in the novel, to raise critical
consciousness on the complex dynamics of Orientalist discourse. In the end, the
study concludes that, on its face value, the novel revolves around the theme of
cultural negotiations in Arab Western diaspora, but beyond engagement with this
theme, the storyline is subtly tainted with the images of self-Orientalism,
appealing to all the four principal dogmas of Orientalism. This finding
suggests that some contemporary Oriental writersin Arab Western diaspora are
complicit in Western cultural imperialism.This paper contributes to the ongoing
postcolonial discourse about cultural representation, identity and power
dynamics in literature by providing African postcolonial literary critics with
critical insights for a broader engagement with discussions about similar
imperialist Africanist discourse, where Africa’s image is stereotypically
constructed using similar rubrics to the Orient’s.
Keywords: Orientalism, Self-Orientalism, Arab Diasporic Literature, Leila
Aboulela
1. Introduction
Literature as a unique
form of human communication that captures and conveys the human experience and
condition is concerned with themes that relate to the cultural, social,
economic, political, and inter- or intra-personal issues of the people and
societies in which they are produced. Beyond engagement with these themes,
literature is also shaped by the thoughts of great minds of its time
(Keerthika, p.471) and the ideological inclination of their social system and
epochs. As a result of this, we find some underlying ideas and ideologies such
as Marxism, Feminism, Capitalism, Communism, and Orientalism among others,
shaping and characterising different regional, sub-regional, and epochal
literatures. In postcolonial literature, these underlying ideologies often
intersect to construct power imbalance between the West and its perceived
inferior ‘Others’, reinforcing dominant cultural norms. Therefore, at the heart
of postcolonial literary criticism is the interrogation, explication and
interpretation of such themes and ideologies to amplify silenced voices and
expose such imbalanced power relations. To this end, this paper is concerned
with the explication ofthe phenomenon of Self-Orientalism as the underlying
ideology shaping the storyline of Leila Aboulela’s Bird Summons.
Self-Orientalism is the
corollary of Orientalism - a Western discourse theorised by Edward Said. In his
seminal work Orientalism, published in 1978, Edward Wadi Said,
a Palestinian-American academic and public intellectual argues that inorder to
justify going out to colonise, plunder, and pillage the rest of the world in
the 18th and 19th centuries in the guise of
civilizing mission, Western colonial powers had to portray themselves as
paragons of virtues and enlightenment, and used stereotypical narratives
(Orientalism) to portray the people they were going to colonise and ‘civilize’
as barbaric and savage, in need of Western civilization and salvation (Bhutto,
Doha Debate, Nov. 2023: video; Said, Orientalism, p.300).
Orientalism, according to Said, is a Western discourse (ideas and institutional
practices) that constructs the image of the Oriental world, people, and
culture, particularly the Middle-East and North Africa (also known as the MENA
region), as exotic, culturally static, savage and barbaric, and essentially
violent. The discourse of Orientalism serves as a tool to justify the notion
that the Orient is in need of salvation by the Western world (the Occident),
which is considered civilised, rational, and the diametric opposite of the
Orient (Said, Orientalism, pp.300-11).
As a tool for Western
cultural domination and imperialism, Orientalism is pervasive, manifesting in
various forms and expressed through different media, including literature,
television shows, art and photography, social media, dance and performance, painting
etc. Its influence extends across divers domains, including academic and
intellectual discourse, cultural representations, politics and foreign policy,
and everyday human attitudes to, and perceptions of the world around them.
According to Ranji, ‘the first step in dealing with Orientalism is seeing it
and acknowledging that it exists in our everyday academic practices of
researching, teaching, performing, peer reviews and communicating with
colleagues’ (Ranji, p.1144).
Traditionally,
Orientalismas a cultural and political ideology of the Western Orientalists is
a defining characteristic of a body of texts and authors, which Edward Said
calls the ‘Orientalist canon’ (Orientalism p.4). In literature,
Orientalism is discernible to those who pay attention to its fine details. For
example, Paulo Coelho’s novel, The Alchemist (2014) tells the
story of Santiago, a Spanish young man undertaking an adventurous journey into
the Egyptian desert in search of what Coelho calls ‘personal legend’. In the
storyline, however, the author leads the protagonist to stealthily depict, in
his imagination, how the Western culture is superior to that of the Orient.
Another example is in Rudyard Kipling’s imperialist poem, The White
Man’s Burden (1899), where the poet constructs the Filipinos as
culturally backward and exhorts the United States to assume the colonial
control of the Philippine Islands under the guise of civilizing mission.These
representations do more than mischaracterization. They create a framework of
power where the ‘West’ positions itself as the ‘‘rational’’, progressive, and
diametric opposite of the ‘Orient’, which is rendered as an object to be known,
controlled, and dominated (Said, p.311).
In the modern times, the
aim of Orientalist discourse is mainly to perpetuate colonial legacies in the
Orient byleadingthe Orientals to internalise in the deepest recesses of their
collective consciousness that they are culturally backward and violent, and
therefore, in need of Western civilization and intervention. Oddly enough,
consciously or unconsciously, this latter goal seems to be gaining traction
among the Oriental literary writers and intellectuals in the diaspora as some
of the literary outputs from the Arab Western diaspora suggest; or as Ashcroft
et al aptly put it, Orientalism now ‘‘spills into the realm of
self-construction in such a way that the Western idea of a set of generalised
Oriental values is consciously promoted by peoples who were themselves lumped
together by Orientalist rubrics’’ (Ashcroft et al, p.154). In other words, the
Arabs and other Oriental subjects, who are constituted as the inferior ‘Other’s
by Western Orientalist discourse are now adopting ‘‘standard Western stereotypes
for themselves’’ as manifest in Oriental literature (Alghamdi, p.93) - a
phenomenon described as ‘‘Self-Orientalism’’ in postcolonial discourse (Drott,
p.4).
As modern Western
discourse and worldview of the ‘Others’ is significantly shaped by 19th century
Orientalist discourse, especially post-September 11th Western
discourse, literary representations of Self-Orientalism, which remain
underexplored, perpetuate subservience to Western narratives, reinforce harmful
stereotypes against non-Western cultures and peoples, and promote the
intellectual, cultural, economic and political domination that colonialism left
behind in the Orient and by extension, Africa; and thereby, problematize the
culturally normative paradigms of Oriental and Islamic culture. For
instance, hijab is now generally seen in Western Orientalist
discourse as a symbol of ‘cultural backwardness, to the point that a
‘hijab-clad’ woman is now considered a social misfit; and “its lifting” as a
sign of modernization and freedom (Hasan, p.43). This calls for a critical
study to raise critical consciousness on the phenomenon and to provide
postcolonial scholars with more insights and new perspectives on the complex
dynamics of Orientalist discourse for a broader engagement with discussions
about decolonization, identity, and cultural representations in literature.To
this end, this paper examines Leila Aboulela’s Bird Summons with
a view to analysing how self-Orientalism manifests subtly in the text’s
storyline of cross-cultural negotiations in Arab Western diasporic literature.
2. Literature Review
Orientalism as a Western
discourse has many faces and objectives, but its primary goal is to lead the
Oriental subjects to internalise in the deepest recesses of their collective
consciousness that they are culturally inferior, backward, lacking in agency to
define themselves, and inherently violent; and therefore, in need of Western
intervention and civilization. The concept of Self-Orientalism, which remains
underdeveloped and underexplored as a relatively new field of scholarly inquiry
within the larger discourse of Orientalism (Dirlik, pp.2-6; Drott, pp.1-10), is
a phenomenon whereby the Oriental individuals or groups, who are heavily
influenced by Orientalist discourse, internalise and participate in the
construction, reinforcement, and circulation of Orientalist stereotype, often
through literary pieces and other forms of cultural expression, in order to conform
to Western cultural standards. In other words, the Orientalists leverage the
power inherent in sustained one-sided Orientalist discourse about the Orient to
construct the West as culturally, politically and economically superior to the
Eastern world, while Self-Orientalism is the long-term effect of such discourse
on the Oriental subjects. Different scholars have viewed the phenomenon of
self-Orientalism from different perspectives.
According to Drott,
Self-Orientalism examines the idea that ‘the Oriental himself participates in
the construction, reinforcement and circulation of Orientalist discourse (p.4).
In the same line of thought, Yan and Santos describe Self-Orientalism as
‘‘either a way of striving for modernity and equality with the West or as a
practice by the Oriental because his or her own knowledge is already so heavily
influenced by Western conceptions’’ (p.298). From another point of Komel sees
the phenomenon as occurring when the Orientals use Western line of thought and
stereotypes to define themselves, describing the phenomenon as people writing
from ‘‘Occidental scripts’’ (p.528). Similarly, Alghamdi sees Self-Orientalism
as a means for indigenous Oriental intellectuals and political elites to
‘‘construe and present themselves – to themselves, to each other, and to the
world’’ based on the ‘‘prevailing Orientalist script’’ (p.93). Self-Orientalist
authors, Alghamdi further posits, assume that aligning with Orientalist agenda
will allow them to get closer to the Western culture they are appealing to; but
unfortunately, self-Orientalist discourse is only recognised by the West as a ‘‘useful
tool in preserving the hegemonic structure’’ of West/Orient cultural dichotomy
(Alghamdi, p.94). In a nutshell, Self-Orientalism is like what Arthur Phillips
describes as ‘‘cultural cringe’’ in the context of Australian culture, where
the Australians feel ashamed or demonstrate inferiority complex toward their
culture, identity or history and attempt to move away from their culture
towards Western cultures as they internalize Western dominant narratives
(Phillips, p.1; Kperogi, p.1).
3. Methodology
Drawing on Edward Said’s
theorization of Orientalism, this study seeks to examine the manifestations of
Orientalist tropes in Leila Aboulela’s Bird Summons as Arab
diasporic literary work. To this end, the study adopts and conducts what Edward
Said calls ‘‘contrapuntal reading’’ of the primary text to unravel the
underlying Orientalist viewpoints that shape its storyline. 'Contrapuntal
reading’ of a literary text, according to Marandi and Shabanirad is a
‘‘counter-narrative’’ that goes beyond the surface of a literary text to
unravel the underlying Orientalist tendencies of the author in order to reveal
the multiple cultural experiences and viewpoints that shape the text's
storyline (p.27). The four principal dogmas of Orientalism, as theorized by
Said in his Orientalism (1978) serve as the analytical
framework for the data analysis.
4. Theoretical Framework
This study is situated
within the context of postcolonial discourse, specifically, Edward Said’s
theorization of Orientalism. Therefore, the data analysis is based on Edward
Said’s concept of Orientalism as a postcolonial discourse. In addition, the
study draws on the postcolonial theorizations of some major postcolonial
thinkers and critics to undergird some positions in the analysis. Specifically,
Michel Foucault’s theorization of discourse, and Gayatri Spivakand Homi
Bhabha’s postcolonial theorisations are borne in mind in the dataanalysis and
interpretation.
5. Data Analysis and
Discussion
Leila Aboulela's Bird
Summons is a cultural product of what Homi Bhabha describes as ‘third
space’ of culture in Western diaspora, where, according to Ahmed, migrants
participate simultaneously in ‘‘social relations that embed them in more than
one nation-state’’, forging and sustaining ‘‘multi-stranded social relations’’
that connect their ‘‘societies of origin and settlement’’ (p.1). However,
beyond engagement with this theme, the storyline is subtly imbued with the
images of self-Orientalism appealing to all the four principal dogmas of
Orientalism.
The first dogma of
Orientalism implies that Orientalist discourse has constructed a binary
opposition between the ‘civilized’, ‘rational’ and ‘humane’ ‘West;’ and the
‘aberrant,’ ‘underdeveloped,’ and ‘inferior’ Middle East (Said, Orientalism, p.301).
Edward Said notes with dismay that ‘writers’ have also accepted this basic
distinction between the East and the West as the ‘‘starting point’’ for their
‘‘novels, social descriptions, and political accounts concerning the Orient,
its people, customs, ‘mind,’ destiny, and so on’’ (Said, Orientalism, p.9).
Accordingly, in Bird Summons, we see the juxtaposition of the
image of the idealised West and ‘irrational’ Orient through the eyes of the
three major characters – Salma, Moni and Iman. For instance, Salma, enlivened
by caffeine on their way to the Scottish Highlands to visit Lady Evelyn’s
gravesite, calls on her co-travellers (Moni and Iman) to ‘‘imagine a
hypothetical situation’’ for fun. Moni’s hypothetical imagination wanders
between killing her husband, Murtada, who lives in Saudi Arabia and insisting
she joins him there, and killing herself and her disabled son, Adam. Then
suddenly, she remembers that she was once counselled against such self-harm
fantasies in Scotland. To demonstrate the cultural binary difference between
the West and the Orient, Moni claims:
No
one in Saudi Arabia would give her that (counsel). Instead, she would sit in
her night dress with her air conditioner on full blast watching television
while the Filipino maid fetched and carried. Whenever she wanted to go out she
would put on her black abaya on top of her night dress and for
many reasons, ranging from lack of wheelchair access to intrusive do-gooders
and fools, she would not be able to take Adam with her (Aboulela, p.27).
This depiction aligns
with the first dogma of Orientalism which sets the West and the Orient (the
Middle-East in this context) in terms of binary oppositions, of which the West
is considered developed and rational while the Orient is underdeveloped and irrational.
As we can see here, the author leads the character of Moni to juxtapose her
idealized West with adequate social services, peopled with rational beings
capable of offering psychological support, and the ‘irrational’ Orient (Saudi
Arabia in this case), where she would have to contend with foolish do-gooders
as she would be confined to the home front in her black abaya. This
Orientalist trope subtly speaks to the first dogma of Orientalism.
In another instance, we
see the representation of the idealization of the West in Bird Summons through
the main protagonist, Salma, where she tries to avoid being seen by her
Scottish husband, David, through her Arab background thus:
She
didn’t want him to be ashamed of her, to feel that he had picked her up from
the back of beyond, and so she became more careful, often not at ease. No
matter how many clients she massaged and no matter that she had given birth to
children with Scottish blood, deep down his people would think that she was not
really one of them, that she was not British enough (Aboulela, p.42).
This Orientalist trope
also speaks to the first dogma of Orientalism which holds that there is
absolute and systematic distinction between the West, which is regarded in
Orientalist discourse as culturally superior, and the Orient, which is regarded
as culturally inferior (Said, Orientalism, p.300).
The second dogma of
Orientalism implies that Orientalist discourse is based on:
abstractions
about the Orient, particularly those based on texts representing a
"classical" Oriental civilization, are always preferable to direct
evidence drawn from modern Oriental realities (Said, Orientalism,
p. 300).
In other words,
Orientalist stereotypical constructions and assumptions about the Orient are
based on assumptions drawn from classical Oriental texts, not based on present
reality of the Orientals’; or as Jim puts it, the second dogma ‘‘holds that
conclusions drawn from ancient traditions, are always preferable to direct
evidence drawn from modern Oriental realities’’ (p.9). That is to say,
Orientalist knowledge of the Orient and its culture is drawn from one-sided
historical accounts and biased interpretation of ancient Islamic texts. For
instance, the concept of Harem as an inviolable secluded area
exclusively reserved for Women in Muslim homes, dating back to the days of the
Ottoman Empire in the 16th century is one of the sources of
Orientalist misconception about the Oriental woman. According to Hasewinkle,
the Ottoman imperial Harem, which was off-limits to outsiders,
except women, was such an Islamic institution that immensely shaped
Orientalists’ understanding of the Ottoman culture and society. The secrecy
associated with the Ottoman Harem, according to Hasewinkle,
led the Western observers, especially the Orientalists to begin to fantasize
and mystify the Harem as a place for reducing the women to
‘‘sex objects’’ (p.7). Accordingly, a typical Oriental woman is seen as
sensual, lacking in agency to speak for herself, helplessly dependent on men,
and a victim of Oriental patriarchy, in need of Western intervention (see
Said, Orientalism, p.6). In line with this assumption, the
Muslim woman, for instance, is believed to be simply born into such a defined
culture, and is said to live it like a destiny (see Jim, p.11).
Accordingly, as the
storyline of Bird Summons unfolds further, Aboulela presents
Iman, as Awajan also puts it, as a completely ‘‘dependent Arab woman’’ who,
unlike Salma and Moni that have adjusted to the Western life, is not capable of
living her life independent of a man (Awajan, p.206). Speaking to this
sentiment, the author paints the image of Iman in Bird Summons thus:
Iman’s
greatest asset was her looks, her finest skills was in drawing men to her; zero
qualifications, English language minimal. What sort of job could she do? Iman
was lazy too. With Salma’s children, she watched children’s TV and she never
got bored. Imagine being told, you’re too beautiful to ever toil, you’er you
are to be kept home in a fine state, you’er created to be pampered and adored –
all that Iman heard as she was growing up (Aboulela, p.73).
In the same vein, Iman,
who is depicted here as totally dependent on men because of her ‘zero
qualifications,’ is also depicted as being burdened by her beauty -
divorcedthree times. She marries her first husband while in her home country of
Syria at the tender age of fifteen. Her second husband brought her to Scotland
and got himself jailed. Her third husband, Ibrahim, who is on foreign
scholarship, marries her with the intention of safeguarding himself against
‘sin’ while his stay in Scotland lasts, but is forced by his parents to divorce
her as they get wind of his self-arranged marriage.
The hijab narrative is
also central in Orientalist discourse about Arab and Muslim women. The hijab is
considered, in Orientalist discourse, as a symbol of patriarchal oppression of
women and cultural backwardness; removing it therefore, symbolizes freedom from
that patriarchal subjugation and oppression. According to Hasan:
Feminist
Orientalist representations of Muslim women have reduced the Muslim social
system to the veil, now considered an icon of cultural backwardness, and “its
lifting” as “the most important sign of reform and modernization. A hijab-clad
woman appears to be a misfit among her Western and “modern” sisters. (Hasan,
p.43).
Accordingly, Iman’s
self-perception and attitude to hijab as portrayed in Bird
Summons reflects this sentiment. At a point during their journey to
the Scottish Highlands to visit the final resting place of Lady Evelyn, whom
they hold as role model; Iman, who is depicted as a serial divorcee burdened by
her beauty, feels burdened by the hijab she wears, saying she wears hijab
because that is how ‘‘my mother dressed and the women in my village. Or that’s
how my husband of the time wanted me to dress’’ (Aboulela, p.183). This
suggests that the hijab is around her neck because it is socially sanctioned,
not a voluntary choice. To free herself from this socially imposed burden of
hijab, therefore, Iman declares ‘‘I will stop wearing hijab. That’s it. I will
take my headscarf off’’ (Aboulela, p.183).
As a hijab-clad woman,
Iman feels she is a misfit among her Western and “modern” sisters – Salma and
Moni, and therefore removes it off to symbolise her freedom. In feminist
Orientalist discourse, Iman needs ‘‘to make her body visible’’ to ‘‘assume her
place in the Western ‘modern’ society on an equal footing’’, which will make
her “capable of being re-codified, redefined, and reformulated according to
new, Western codes’’ (Hasan, p. 43). But unfortunately, as Edward Said puts it,
whatever the Oriental does to move closer to being seen as a
Western-culture-compliant, they remain ‘‘a despised heretic’’ (Said, p.301).
Symbolizing this notion, for instance, Iman remains an ‘‘unidentified creature,
a mix of mammal and reptile, horrific and yet beautiful’’after their symbolic
transformation in the Scottish Highlands (Aboulela, p.221), suggesting that
even if the Oriental woman attempted to transform to Westerner, she remained
what the Orientalists see her as – inferior, uncivilized, horrible. All these
assumptions are based on abstraction about the Oriental woman which is rooted
in Ottoman era Harem, not on the current reality of the Oriental
woman. The current reality on ground is that wearing veil or hijab for the
Muslim woman is a matter of choice and comfort, rather than compulsion; and
hijab is not exclusively Muslim woman’s tradition. Ethiopian Orthodox Tewahedo
church-goers also wear hijab on Sabbath day to cover from head to toe.
The third dogma of
Orientalism suggests that:
the
Orient is eternal, uniform, and incapable of defining itself; therefore, it is
assumed that a highly generalized and systematic vocabulary for describing the
Orient from a Western standpoint is inevitable and even scientifically
objective (Said, Orientalism, p.301).
In other words, as the
West is progressing, the Orient is eternally stuck in its classical past. In
line with this notion, Orientalists view Islam and Islamic culture as
‘‘monolithic, scornful of human life, (and) unchanging’’ (Encyclopedia of
Islamic Studies, 2010, p.10). Accordingly, the irreducible minimum tenet of
Orientalism is to accept this age long European tradition of representing the
Orient and the West in terms of binary oppositions in which the Orient is
viewed as culturally static and incapable of changing. We see this
representation of the Orient as ‘monolithic and unchanging’ as the novel opens
with a starting incident which sets members of the Arab Speaking Women Group in
Scotland as people who allow emotion to dominate their sense of reasoning as
they resist change; a depiction that appeals to the third Orientalist dogma
that sees the Orientals as culturally 'unchanging' people, who live their lives
according ‘‘set rules inscribed in sacred texts, not in response to the
changing demands of life’’ (Mamdani, p.1). This Orientalist trope is subtly
depicted in Bird Summons as Salma, who represents Western
'rational' value of cultural adjustment based on changing demands of life,
appeals to the other Arab Speaking Women’s sense of reasoning to see Lady
Evelyn, a British convert, as their role model:
She
worshipped as we worshipped, though she kept her own culture, wore Edwardian
fashion, shot deer and left instructions for bagpipes to be played at her
funeral. She is the mother of Scottish Islam and we need her as our role model
(Aboulela, p.2).
However, as the Arab
women see the portrait of Lady Evelyn without hijab, instead of seeing reasons
for cultural shift, they resist the call thus:
Why
didn't she wear hijab? Why wasn't she in touch with other Muslims? Sounds like
an eccentric imperialist no offense ... The women started dropping out of the
trip because their friends were dropping out or because their husbands
discouraged them (Aboulela, pp.2-3).
The depiction of the
Arab women resisting persuasion to see Lady Evelyn, who represents cultural
compromise, as role model, simply because she did not wear hijab during her
life time, paints an Orientalist image of Arab women who, in the words of
Mamdani, live their lives strictly based on ‘‘set rules inscribed in sacred
texts, not in response to the changing demands of life’’ (p.1). This depiction
subtly appeals to the third dogma of Orientalism which holds the view that the
Orient is eternally stuck in the past. In other words, this Orientalist trope
reinforces the Orientalist discourse that constructs the Orient as unchanging,
especially if the change requires cultural adjustment that goes against their
sacred belief system as enshrined in their sacred texts.
In a similar fashion,
the third dogma of Orientalism also suggests that the Orient is culturally
stuck in the past and incapable of making progress. Accordingly, as the
storyline progresses, Aboulela leads the character of Iman to demonstrate how
culturally static, in Orientalist terms, is the Orient. We see this
representation again after the magical transformation of the major characters,
where Iman transforms to an ‘‘unidentified creature, a mix of mammal and
reptile, horrific and yet beautiful’’ (Aboulela, p.221; Awajan, p.207). Here,
Aboulela insinuates that even after cultural and physical transformation in the
‘third space of culture,’ Iman remains a ‘sensual’ and ‘cruel’ creature; a
typical image of the Orient in Western Orientalist discourse.
The fourth dogma of
Orientalism, according to Said, holds that the Orient is essentially violent -
something to be feared and controlled by pacification, research and
development, or by outright occupation whenever possible (p.301). As such,
Orientalist literary discourse about the Orient tends to focus on tales of
violence. Accordingly, after the magical transformation of Salma, Moni, and
Iman on the Scottish Highlands on their way to visit the gravesite of Lady
Evelyn, Iman, who is earlier depicted as a character whose ‘‘greatest asset was
her looks’’, and ‘‘her finest skills were in drawing men to her; with zero
qualifications’’, symbolically appears to Moni as a ‘horrific’ and ‘repulsive’
being (Aboulela, p.73 and 221). This symbolic representation appeals to the
fourth Orientalist dogma that sees the Orient and the Orientals as something to
be either feared or controlled, even after their cultural transformation. This
explains why today, in Arab Western diaspora, Islamophobia remains a major
social concern among even those Arabs and Muslims that have lived in the West
for a considerable period of time.
6. Conclusion
This paper has examined
the representations of Self-Orientalism in the novel Bird Summons. The
article argues that the storyline of the novel revolves around the theme of
cross-cultural negotiations in the ‘third space’ of culture. However, beyond
engagement with this theme, this analysis demonstrates that the storyline of
the novel is sparsely and subtly dotted with the images of Self-Orientalism,
appealing to all the four principal dogmas of Orientalism as espoused in Edward
Said’s Orientalism (1978). This suggests that some contemporary Oriental
writers and intellectuals in Arab Western Diaspora are complicit in Western
cultural imperialism because they are heavily influenced by Orientalist
discourse. As theoretical insight derivable from this study, the study posits
that the four principal dogmas of Orientalism, as a structured lens for the
analysis of Orientalist discourse, is a veritable analytical framework for the
analysis of power dynamics between the West and its inferior ‘Others’,
including Africa as Western ‘Other’. This is because, although Orientalism
focuses on West’s relationship with Islam and the Orient, as a discursive mode,
it models a wide spectrum of institutional constructions of the colonial
‘Other’, including the discussion, study, and general representation of Africa
in the West, at least since the nineteenth century. Therefore, this study
concludes by advocating for the adoption of the four principal dogmas of
Orientalism as analytical framework for the analysis of Orientalist Africanist
discourses, where Africa is stereotypically portrayed using similar rubrics to
the Orient’s – in literature, news media, and other forms of cultural
expressions.
References
Aboulela, Leila. Bird
Summons. London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson, 2019
Alghamdi, Sameha. Orientalism
and its Challenges: Feminist Critiques of Orientalist Knowledge Production.
A Ph.D. Dissertation. York University, Toronto, Ontario, 2020.
Ashcroft, Bill et
al. Post-Colonial Studies: The Key Concepts. (2nd edition).
London: Routledge Taylor and Frances Group, 2007.
Atmadja, Aaren
Abigail. The Spectacle of Yellow Bodies and DisOriented Futures:
Deciphering Techno-Orientalist Manifestations of East Asia in Science Fiction. Unpublished
Honours Thesis, Department of Communication, Media, and Film, University of
Calgary, 2023. Open Access. Retrieved online on 31st May, 2024.
Awajan,
NasaybaW.Constructing Arab Western Identities Through Metamorphosis in Laila
Aboulela’s Bird Summons. World Journal of English Language. Vol.13(8),
2023.pp.202-209. http://wjel.sciedupress.com retrieved on 21st January, 2024.
Bhabha, Homi K. The
Location of Culture. London: Routledge, 1994.
Coelho, Paulo. The
Alchemist. Sydney: HarperCollins Publishers, 2014.
Dirlik, Arif. Chinese
History and the Question of Orientalism. History and Theory. Vol.35(4),
1996, pp96-118.
Dirlik, Arif. The
Postcolonial Aura: Third World Criticism in the Age of Global Capitalism.
Westview Press, 1997.
Doha Debate. Dena
Takruri (moderator). Topic: "Orientalism Demystified: Eastern Insights on
Western Myths". A Video Production of Qatar Foundation, (Nov. 2023).
Retrieved from https//qatardebate.org on 12th May, 2024.
Drott, Nadja. Oriental
Narratives or a Western Script? Self-Orientalism, The Orient and The Oriental:
A Discourse Analysis of Three Contemporary Historical Novels. Uppsala
Universitet, 2016. DiVA portal. www.diva-portal.org.
Retrieved on 14th January, 2024.
El-Enany, Rashid. Arab
Representations of the Occident: East-West Encounters in Arabic Fiction. Canada:
Routledge, 2006.
Fanon, Fanon. Black
Skin, White Masks. London: Pluto Press, 2008.
Fanon, Fanon. The
Wretched of the Earth. New York: Grove Weidenfeld, 1963.
Foucault, Michel. The
Order of Discourse. Inaugural Lecture at the College de France, given 2nd December,
1970. In Young, Robert (ed). Untying the Text: A Post-Structuralist
Reader. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul Ltd, 1970.
Gibb, Hamilton Alexander
R. Studies on the Civilization of Islam. London: 1962.
Hasan, M. ‘The
Orientalization of Gender’ The American Journal of Islamic Social
Sciences, 22(4), (n.d), pp.26-56.
Hasan, Mahmudul. ‘The
Orientalization of Gender’ The American Journal of Islamic Social
Sciences, 22(4), (n.d), pp.26-56.
Hasewinkle, Adam. The
Development of Orientalism in the Ottoman Imperial Harem. Open Access.
(n.d).Retrieved online from https://beyondboundariesjournal.org on 7th October, 2024.
Keerthika, S. Literature
and Society: How Literature Reflects Society. International Journal of
Science, Engineering and management. Vol.3 (4), April 2018, pp471-472.
Kipling, Rudyard. ‘The
White Man’s Burden’. McClures’s Magazine. 1899.
Komel, Mirt. Re-Orientalizing
the Assassins in Western Historical-FictionLiterature: Orientalism and
Self-Orientalism in Bartol’sAlamut, Tarr’sAlamut, Boschert’sAssassins
of Alamut and Oden’s Lion of Cairo. European Journal of
Cultural Studies. Vol.17(5), 2014, pp.525-548.
Komel, Mirt. Orientalism
in Assassin’s Creed: Self-Orientalizing the Assassins from from Forerunners of
Modern Terrorism into Occidentalized Heroes. Teorija in Praksa, 51(1),
2014.
Kperogi, Farooq.
(Nigerian Tribune, June 1st, 2024, Online Version). 'New' National
Anthem is National self-Debasement. Retrieved from https://tribuneonlineng.com, on 1st June, 2024.
Mambrol, Nasrullah. Analysis
of Edward Said's Orientalism. Open Access, (2020). Retrieved from
www.literariness.org on 30th May, 2024.
Mamdani, Mahmood. Good
Muslim, Bad Muslim: America, the Cold War, and the Roots of Terror. Kampala:
Fountain Publishers, (2005).
Phillips, Arthur A. The
Cultural Cringe. Meanjin, Vol.9(2), (1950), pp.149-155.
Ranji, Banafsheh. Traces
of Orientalism in Media Studies. Media, Culture and Society, Vol.43(6), 2021,
p.1136 – 1146.
Said, Edward. Culture
and Imperialism. Vintage Books. (1993).
Said, Edward. Orientalism. New
York: Vintage Books. (1978).
Sinusoid, Darya. The
Intersection of Latent and Manifest Orientalism. An Excerpt from the Shortform
Book Guide to ‘Orientalism’ by Edward said. (2021). Available at https://www.shortform.com/blog/latent-and-manifest.
Teo, Hsu-Ming.
‘Orientalism: An Overview.’ Australian Humanities Review 54
(2013): pp.1-20.
0 Comments