Ad Code

Appraisal of Social impact of Non-formal Education Programmes on Custodial Inmates for Community Development in Katsina State, Nigeria

Article Citation: Mannir Abba & Asiyatu Abubakar Bagudo (2020). Appraisal of Social impact of Non-formal Education Programmes on Custodial Inmates for Community Development in Katsina State, Nigeria. DEGEL: The Journal of the Faculty of Arts and Islamic Studies, Vol. 18, No. 2. ISSN 0794-9316

APPRAISAL OF SOCIAL IMPACT OF NON-FORMAL EDUCATION PROGRAMMES ON CUSTODIAL INMATES FOR COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT IN KATSINA STATE, NIGERIA

By

Mannir Abba & Asiyatu, Abubakar Bagudo

Abstract

This study focussed on assessing the social impact of Non-formal Education (NFE) programmes on custodial inmates for community development in Katsina State, Nigeria. Two research questions and one null hypothesis guided the study. A descriptive survey research design was adopted for the study. The population of the study was 762 inmates in the 11 correctional custodial centres in Katsina State at the time of the study out of which a sample of 351 respondents comprising all the 266 male convicted inmates and 85 female convicted inmates of the Katsina central correctional centre were purposively selected for the study. The instrument used for data collection was self-structured questionnaire tagged “Questionnaire on Social Impact of Non-formal Education Programmes on Custodial Inmates (QOSIONFEPOCI)”. The instrument was subjected to face validation by three experts. The reliability index of the research instrument was 0.85. The data collected for the study were analysed using descriptive statistics of mean and standard deviation, while the null hypothesis was tested using t-test at the probability of 0.05 level of significance. The findings of the study revealed among others that there were inmates trainees in the Katsina central custodial centre and most of them have benefited from the programmes by acquiring knowledge tthat enhanced their social well-being during and after their incarceration. Based on these findings, the study recommended among others that, the Nigerian government should introduce and extend more NFE programmes for inmates in the custodial centres of the state. Also governmental and non-governmental organisations and other stakeholders should be encouraged to provide the much needed support for effective integration of discharged inmates into the society and enhancing their social well-being in the state and country at large.

Introduction

Nations have formulated rules and regulations which constitute the penal policies towards the administration and dispensation of criminal justice in the effort to punish as well as reform criminal-minded individuals. The rationale for imprisonment in Nigeria is evident in decree No. 9 of 1972 which assigns the prisons with the responsibility among other functions, to teach and train the prisoners to become useful and law abiding citizens on discharge. These responsibilities according to Igbo (2007) are discharged through carefully designed and well-articulated administrative, reformative and rehabilitative programmes aimed at inculcating discipline, respect for law and order, and the dignity of honest labour. The offender, in this wise, is prepared to become not only law abiding but also useful to both himself and the society at the expiration of his/her sentence. The United Nations (UN) Declaration of Human Rights in 1948 states that everyone has a right to education and Rule 71 (3) of the UN Standard Minimum Rules for the Treatment of Prisoners states “sufficient work of useful nature shall be provided to keep prisoners actively employed for a normal working day”. Nigeria, considering this as significant, strongly endorsed this declaration in 1976.

Nigeria Correctional Service (NCS) was formally known as Nigeria Prisons Service (NPS). Nigeria Prison Service according to Abba and Mbagwu (2016) was renamed as Nigeria Correctional Service (NCS) following third reading and passage of “A Bill for an Act to Repeal the Prisons Act Cap. P29 Laws of the Federation of Nigeria, 2004 and enact the Nigerian Prison and Correctional Service in order to make comprehensive provision for the administration of prisons in Nigeria and for related purpose by the Senate”. According to the Bill, the change of name of the sector is “to underscore the human aspect of the reform focus of prisons administration and to conform to provisions in the international instrument”. The Nigerian Correctional Service (NCS) according to Hassan and Oloyede (2013) is exclusively a Federal Government concern and phenomenon which means that no State for now has the constitutional responsibility to operate or maintain inmates’ correctional service custodial centres.

The statutory objectives of the Nigerian Correctional Service according to Federal Republic of Nigeria (2019) include ensuring the safe custody of awaiting trial and convicted inmates as well as their reformation and rehabilitation. These responsibilities are discharged through carefully designed and well-articulated administrative, reformative and rehabilitative programmes aimed at inculcating discipline, respect for law and order, and the dignity of honest labour. In the word of Obiozor and Obidiegwu (2013), the offender, in this wise, is prepared to become not only law abiding but also useful to both himself and the society at the expiration of his sentence.

The concept of inmates’ custodial centre is perceived differently by different authorities. Asokhia and Agbonluae (2013) views inmates’ custodial centre as an institution which has been set aside by law for safe custody of people, legally confined for anti-social behavior, with a view to training them to become useful citizens of the free society after incarceration. In the context of this study, it is an institution designed to securely house and rehabilitate people who have been convicted of crime or are on awaiting trial. These individuals known as inmates are kept in continuous custody on a short or long-term basis in correctional custodial centres or hospital.

In Katsina State, FGN (2019) reports that there are 11 custodial centres at the time of the study such as, Katsina central custodial centre (convicts); Daura medium security custodial centre (convicts); Daura old custodial centre (convicts); Funtua medium security custodial centre (convicts); Dtsinma satellite custodial centre (awaiting trials); Jibia satellite custodial centre (awaiting trials); Malumfashi satellite custodial centre (awaiting trials); Mani satellite custodial centre (awaiting trials); Musawa satellite custodial centre (awaiting trials); Kankia satellite custodial centre (awaiting trials) and Ingawa custodial farm centre.

For the purpose of actualising the objectives of rehabilitation of inmates in the country, NFE programmes are advocated and provided in Nigerian inmates’ custodial centres in a wide range of adult education courses which are both relevant and essential for eradication of illiteracy among inmates and enabling them to become self-employed after serving their jail terms. Despite the existence of these NFE programmes in the custodial centres yet, the rate of crimes, illiteracy, unemployment and recidivism among ex-prisoners is on the increased in the area. Recidivism means “relapsing of discharged prisoners back to criminal behaviour which sometimes may forces them back to criminal behaviour and re-conviction into custodial centres.

From the foregoing, non-formal education has been defined in different ways by various scholars. Obiozor and Obidiegwu (2013) defines non-formal education as all educational activities which take place outside the school system. It covers all educational activities or training which is aimed at improving knowledge, skills, attitude and values of different groups of people, children, youth and adults out of school. It is an educational activity with a purpose designed to meet the need and situation of the learner. This means that it is purposeful and flexible, designed to meet with the challenging life circumstances and make learners competent throughout life. In the word of Ngwu (2016), non-formal adult education covers training and instruction outside the formal education, apprenticeship, vocational training in craft centres, and even a nationwide mass literacy campaigns. It includes such forms of education for critical consciousness (self and social awareness) or community education as integral parts of development action programmes.

The available non-formal education programmes, in some Nigerian prisons according to Ngwu (2016) include: basic literacy education programme; post-literacy; functional literacy; continuing education; remedial education; vocational education; distance education; and civic education programmes. These programmes are advocated and provided for the rehabilitation of inmates in a wide range of adult education courses which are both relevant and essential for their employment after serving their prison terms.

Social well-being is an end state in which basic human needs are met and people are able to coexist peacefully in communities with opportunities for advancement. This end state is characterised by equal access to and delivery of basic needs services (water, food, shelter, and health services), the provision of primary and secondary education, the return or resettlement of those displaced by violent conflict, and the restoration of social fabric and community life. In the context of this study, the term “social wellbeing” is a sense of involvement with prison inmates and with prison environment or with the communities. Many researchers believed that wellbeing is not just about being happy or content, but also about being actively engaged with life and with other people. According to Abba (2016), peace cannot be sustained over the long term without addressing the social well-being of a population. Without basic necessities such as food or shelter, large-scale social instability will persist because people will be unable to resume the functions of normal life—sustaining a livelihood, travelling safely, engaging in community activities, or attending school. Without helping people return to their homes or new communities of their choice or providing a means for peacefully keeping away from crimes and civil offences, prison inmates and ex-prisoners may not move beyond recidivating back to prison or rebuild their lives.

To the best knowledge of the researcher, no empirical studies have specifically ever been carried out on the social impact of non-formal education programmes on custodial inmates in the study area. It is against this background that this study set to carry out a research on the social impact of non-formal education programmes on custodial inmates in Katsina State, Nigeria.

Statement of the Problem

It is evident from the background that, the statutory objectives of the Nigerian Correctional Service include ensuring the safe custody of awaiting trial and convicted inmates as well as their reformation and rehabilitation. For the purpose of actualizing these objectives, non-formal education programmes for the rehabilitation of inmates were established in some Nigeria correctional service custodial centres. In spite of the present modest improvements of the correctional service, the prison inmates’ population in the country continues to witness a dramatic increase in recent years of which FGN (2019) noted that the figures from the prisons indicate that there was a total of 48,408 prisoners in custody nationwide as at the year 2019. Out of this number, 33,552 are awaiting trials while only 14,856 are convicts. About 70 percent of these persons “awaiting trials” are charged for offences ranging from armed robbery to murder, arson, drugs trafficking, pipeline offences etc.

Sadly, there is an apparent lack of research report which has examined the social impact of NFE programmes on custodial inmates in the study area. Hence, the need for this study which examined the social impact of non-formal education programmes on custodial inmates in Katsina State, Nigeria. Thus, this study was carried out to fill the research gap by providing information on the social impact of non-formal education programmes on custodial inmates in the study area.

Review of Related Empirical Studies

For the purpose of this study, several empirical studies that are related to this work are reviewed as follows.

Agbakwuru and Godfrey (2016) carried out a study on Incarceration and the Well-being of Prison Inmates in Nigeria. The main purpose of the study was to investigate the influence of incarceration on the well-being of prison inmates in Nigerian prisons in Port Harcourt Prison, Rivers State, Nigeria. The population of inmates in this prison at the time of study was 2,997 while the sample size for the study was 250 inmates. The study adopted ex-post facto research design. The results of the study show that nature of incarceration does not influence the physical and vocational well-being of prison inmates. However, it influences their psychological, social and educational well-being.

The study of Agbakwuru and Godfrey is related to the present study as they are both concerned with rehabilitation of inmates and their well-being in prison and after incarceration. However, both studies differ as Agbakwuru and Godfrey study was on the influence of incarceration on the well-being of prison inmates in Nigerian prisons in Port Harcourt Prison in Rivers State, Nigeria, while the present study focused on the social impact of NFE programmes on custodial inmates in Katsina State, Nigeria.

Abba and Mbagwu (2016) carried out a study titled “Vocational Skills Training Needs of Prison inmates for Economic Growth in Katsina State, Nigeria”. Descriptive survey design was adopted for the study. One research question and one null hypothesis guided the study. The population of the study was 1,420 prison inmates of the three convicts’ prisons in the State at the time of the study. The sample size of the study was 351 convicted prison inmates comprising 266 males and 85 females. The instrument used for data collection was self-structured questionnaire tagged “Questionnaire on Vocational Skills Training Needs of Prison Inmates (QVSTNPI). The instrument was subjected to face validation by three experts. The reliability coefficient for the instrument was 0.80. The data collected was presented using descriptive statistics of mean and standard deviation, while the null hypothesis was tested using t-test at the probability of 0.05 level of significance. The finding of the study revealed among others that there were prison inmates trainees in the Katsina Central Convicts’ prison of the study area. The study recommended among others that qualified vocational instructors in various trades should be recruited into Nigeria Prisons Service (NPS) for the training of inmates in the study area and the country at large.

The study is related to the present one, as they are both concerned with educational programmes for rehabilitation of inmates. However, both studies differ as Abba and Mbagwu (2016) carried out a study on vocational skills training needs of prison inmates for economic growth in Katsina State while the present study assesses the social impact of VSA programmes on custodial inmates in Katsina State, Nigeria.

A study on Vocational Training Needs of Prison Inmates in Delta State for Self Reliance was carried out by Onweonye, Obinne and Odu (2013). The purpose of the study is to investigate the vocational training needs of prison inmates in five prisons of Delta State – Warri, Sapele, Kwale, Agbor and Ogwashi - uku Prisons, Nigeria. A survey research design was adopted for the investigation. The population of the study comprises 196 prison inmates and 48 trade instructors, making total of 244 respondents. The total population of the respondents is used as the sample size of the study. The instrument for data collection was a structured questionnaire, whereas the analysis of the collected data was done using mean and standard deviations while the test of the research hypotheses was done using t-test. The result of the findings of the study revealed among others that there were prison inmates’ trainees in the five prisons of Delta State and there are inadequate educational programmes for the rehabilitation of inmates in the study area. Based on the findings, Onweonye, et al (2013) recommended among others that well- equipped modern workshops should be built in all the prison location for effective inmates training and rehabilitation. The study is related to the present study as they are both concerned with educational programmes for rehabilitation of inmates. However, both studies differ as Onweonye, et al (2013) study was on vocational training needs of prison inmates in Delta State for Self Reliance while the present study assessed the social impact of NFE programmes on custodial inmates in Katsina State, Nigeria. Also, the later and the present study also differ in terms of subject area, population and geographical location.

A study on rehabilitation of convicts in Federal Prisons in Kogi State, Nigeria was carried out by Ugwuoke and Ameh (2014). The purpose of the study was to examine the effectiveness of Kogi State Prisons in carrying out their assigned duties of rehabilitating and reforming inmates and ensuring their reintegration into the society as complete, self-supporting members of the society. Descriptive survey design was adopted for the study. The population of the study was 868 respondents which consist of 410 convicts and 458 staff of the prisons as at May, 2010. The study made use of a sample of 147 respondents which were selected using stratified random sampling technique. The instrument for data collection was a structured questionnaire, whereas the analysis of the collected data was done using simple percentages and chi-square (x2). The result of the findings of the study revealed among others that 43 (10.6%) out of 410 are recidivist while majority are first offenders; this implies that ex-convicts actually relapse back to crime. Based on the findings, Ugwuoke and Ameh recommended among others that: urgent need for a practical review of Nigeria’s penal policy should be intensified for the rehabilitation of prison inmate in Nigerian prisons. This study is related to the present study as they are both concerned with programmes that are centred to rehabilitation of inmates. However, both studies differs as Ugwuoke and Ameh study was on rehabilitation of convicts in Nigeria prisons, while the present study assessed the social impact of NFE programmes on custodial inmates in Katsina State, Nigeria.

Another study was carried out by Hassan and Oloyede (2013) on the evaluation of the components of adult education on the inmates’ welfare in Agodi Prison Yard, Ibadan, Oyo State, Nigeria. The main purpose of the study was to assess the impact of adult education programmes on the inmates. Survey design was adopted for the study. The population of the study comprised 640 respondents (awaiting trials, convicts and prison staff) obtained from the prison yard. Through simple random sampling technique, 195 respondents were selected as sample size from the entire population of the study. The instrument for data collection was a structured questionnaire. The research data was analyzed using 4 points rating scale on a weight value of 4 – 1. The result of findings of the study revealed among others that the major adult education programmes provided for inmates in the prison were basic literacy and post literacy programme, vocational and technical education, religious education, computer education, distance learning education programme in that order.

The study of Hassan and Oloyede (2013) is related to the present study as both of them concerned with adult education programmes for inmates. Also both the study and the present study are survey research designs. However, both studies differ as Hassan and Oloyede study was on the evaluation of the component of adult education on the inmates’ welfare while the present study assessed the social impact of NFE programmes on custodial inmates in Katsina State, Nigeria. The study of Hassan and Oloyede and the present study also differ in terms of population and geographical location.

Finally, Omoni and Ijeh (2009) carried out a study titled “An Assessment of the Qualitative Education for Prisoners in Delta State, Nigeria”. Descriptive survey design was adopted for the study. The population of the study consisted of all the 310 prison staff in the five prisons in Delta State: Agbor, Kwale, Ogwashi-Uku, Sapele and Warri, and 166 academic staff of the College of Education, Agbor making total of 476 respondents. The researchers used stratified random sampling technique to determine the sample size of 300 respondents for the study. The instrument for data collection for the study was a self-structured questionnaire, whereas the data was analysed using simple percentages and chi-square (x2). The findings of the study revealed among others that the two groups agreed that prisoners need vocational and formal education for their rehabilitation. The study is related to this present study because both studies focused on non-formal educational programmes for inmates. However, both studies differ as the study of Omoni (2009) assessed the qualitative education for prisoners while the present study assessed the social impact of NFE programmes on custodial inmates in Katsina State, Nigeria.

From the literature reviewed, it is clear that most of the existing studies did pay more attention to economic benefits as against social benefits of NFE programmes for inmates which are the focus of this study. Also, most of the locally available studies focused on other States other than Katsina State. The essence of this study is to fill the identified gaps in the literature.

Purpose of the Study

The general purpose of the study is to assess the social impact of non-formal education programmes on custodial inmates in Katsina State, Nigeria. Specifically, the study sought to:

1.                  Examine the extent to which non-formal educational programmes have enhanced social well- being of custodial inmates in Katsina State, Nigeria.

2.                  Ascertain the challenges facing non-formal educational programmes for enhancing social well-being of custodial inmates in Katsina State, Nigeria.

Research hypothesis

H01 There is no significant difference between the mean ratings of the male and female custodial inmates on the extent to which non-formal educational programmes for inmates enhanced their social well-being in Katsina State, Nigeria.

Research Methodology

The research design for this study was descriptive survey design. Descriptive survey research design according to Nworgu, (2015), aims at studying a group of people or items by collecting and analysing data from a sample of the same group or items considered to be a representative of the entire population. This design is suitable for the study as the researcher was interested in the assessment of the social impact of NFE programmes on custodial inmates in Katsina State, Nigeria.

The population of the study is 762 inmates of the 11 correctional custodial centres in Katsina State at the time of the study out of which a sample of 351 comprising all the 266 male long term convicted inmates and 85 long term female convicted inmates of the Katsina central correctional custodial centre were purposively selected for the study. The rationale behind choosing Katsina central custodial centre and it convicted inmates is for the fact that, out of the available custodial centres in the State, NFE programmes for the rehabilitation of inmates are only found available in the Katsina central custodial centre at the time of the study. However, even in the selected custodial centre the NFE programmes were majorly designed for convicted inmates. Therefore, the researcher used the whole convicted inmates in the selected centre for the

Study. See table 1 bellow for the population and sample size of the respondents for the study.

Table 1: Population and Sample Size of the Respondents for the Study

S/N

Prison Location

Number of Awaiting Trial Inmates (A T I)

Total ATI

Number of Convicted Inmates (C I)

Total CP

Grand Total Inmates’

Total Sampled Males

C I

 

Total

Sampled Females

C I

Grand Total

Sampled C I

Male

 Females

 

Male

 Female

Population

 

 

 

1.

Katsina Central

Custody

 

48

 

20

 

68

 

266

 

85

 

351

 

419

 

266

 

85

 

351

2.

 

Daura Medium Security Custody

 

20

 

13

 

33

 

33

 

15

 

48

 

81

 00

 

00

 

00

3.

Daura Old Custody

 

20

 

06

 

26

 

23

 

12

 

35

 

61

 00

 

00

 

00

4.

Dutsinma Satellite Prison

10

04

14

11

04

15

29

 00

 

00

 

00

5.

Funtua Medium Security Prison

14

06

20

22

07

29

49

 00

 

00

 

00

6.

Ingawa Farm Centre

12

05

17

23

07

30

47

 00

 

00

 

00

7.

Jibiya Satellite Prison

07

04

11

12

06

18

29

 00

 

00

 

00

8.

Kankia Satellite Prison

06

04

10

08

06

14

24

 00

 

00

 

00

9.

Malumfashi Satellite Prison

07

04

11

06

03

09

20

 00

 

00

 

00

10.

Mani Satellite Prison

03

02

05

00

00

00

05

 00

 

00

 

00

11.

Musawa Satellite Prison

06

04

10

05

03

08

18

 00

 

00

 

00

Total

 11

153

72

225

409

148

557

782

266

85

351

 

Source: Nigeria Correctional Service (NCS), Katsina State Command Headquarters (2021) Report.

The research instrument used for data collection was a structured questionnaire designed by the researchers titled, “Questionnaire on Social Impact of Non-formal Education Programmes on Custodial Inmates (QOSIONFEPOCI)”. It had total of 16 items in 2 clusters (A and B), 8 items grouped in each cluster based on the two research questions formulated for the study. The instrument was face validated by three experts from the Faculty of Education and Extension Services, Usmanu Danfodiyo University, Sokoto. In order to ascertain the reliability of the instrument, using two research assistants 36 copies of the questionnaire were administered to convicted inmates of the Sokoto central correctional service custodial centre which did not form part of the study area but is similar in nature and has common NFE programmes for inmates. The internal consistency reliability of the instrument was established for the study using Cronbach Alfa with a reliability coefficient of 0.85. The essence was to determine whether the research instrument is consistent in measuring what it is expected to measure in terms of it clarity and comprehensiveness. For the purpose of data collection for the study, a quantitative method of field survey was used in this study by the researchers. This was done with the aid of two research assistants from each of the male and female custodies of the Katsina central custodial centre respectively, making total of four research assistants for the study. The entire instruments were administered and collected the same day and a hundred percent (100%) rate of return was recorded. The data was analysed using descriptive statistics of mean. Real limit of the mean value was used to answer the research questions of the study. This was classified based on the following level of extent and agreement: for the research question 1, any item whose real limit is within 3.50 - 4.00 was regarded as Very High Extent (VHE), 2.50 – 3.49 as High Extent (HE), 1.50 – 2.49 as Low Extent (LE) and 0.05 – 1.49 as Very Low Extent (VLE). For the research question 2, any item whose real limit mean value is 3.50 - 4.00 was regarded as Strongly Agree (SA), 2.50 – 3.49 as Agree (A), 1.50 – 2.49 as Disagree (D) and 0.05 – 1.49 as Strongly Disagree (SD). The inferential statistics of t-test was used to test the null hypothesis at 0.05 level of significance. In testing the null hypotheses, the probability associated with the t-value was used for taking decision. When the associated probability value is greater than 0.05 level of significance, the researchers accepts the null hypothesis. Whereas the associated probability value is less than 0.05 level of significance, the researchers rejects the null hypothesis.

Research Results

Research Question One:

To what extent have non-formal education programmes enhanced social well- being of the custodial inmates in Katsina State, Nigeria?

The result of the study as presented in Table 1 shows the mean and standard deviations of the respondents on the extent to which non-formal educational programmes have enhanced social well- being of the inmates in Katsina State. Result from items 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8 had mean ratings of 3.13, 2.88, 2.66, 2.77, 2.83, 2.78, 2.72 and 2.77 with standard deviations of 0.71, 0.82, 0.81, 0.80, 0.82, 0.84, 0.93 and 0.86 respectively. This is because the mean values of the items are above the cut off mean of 2.50 for decision making. The cluster mean of 2.82 with a standard deviation of 0.35 is obtained in the above results, concluding that respondents accept to a high extent that their participation in the NFE programmes have enhanced their social well-being by influencing change in their behaviour for better.

Table 1: Mean and Standard deviations of the respondents on the extent to which non-formal education programmes enhanced social well-being of the custodial inmates in Katsina State, Nigeria

S/No

Item

N

S D

Dec.

1

Inmates’ skills acquisition through non-formal education programmes of your prison has influenced changing of their behaviour for better.

351

3.13

0.71

HE

2

Inmates’ skills acquisition through non-formal education programmes has empowered them to keep away from violence within and outside the prison wall.

351

2.88

0.82

HE

3

Inmates’ skills acquisition through non-formal education programmes in the prison has empowered them to acquire communal spirit of helping each other.

351

2.66

0.81

HE

4

Inmates’ skills acquisition through non-formal education programmes has contributed in reducing the rate of social vices in the society by empowering them to become self-reliance within and outside the prison wall.

351

2.77

0.80

HE

5

Inmates’ skills acquisition through non-formal education programmes has empowered them to keep away from unlawful assembly that may lead them to get involved in prison riot or jail break.

350

2.83

0.82

HE

6

Inmates’ skills acquisition through non-formal education programmes has empowered them to have the means of settling debt charges against them.

351

2.78

0.84

HE

7

Inmates’ skills acquisition through non-formal education programmes has empowered them to keep away from drug abuse act in discharge.

351

2.72

0.93

HE

8

Inmates’ skills acquisition through non-formal education programmes has empowered them to continue to take care of their family during and after their jail term.

351

2.77

0.86

HE

 

Grand Mean and Standard Deviation

351

2.82

0.37

HE

 

Key: Key: N = Number of respondents,  = mean, SD = Standard Deviation, Dec. = Decision, and HE = High Extent.

Hypothesis One (H01)

There is no significant difference between the mean ratings of the male and female custodial inmates on the extent to which non-formal education programmes enhanced their social well- being in Katsina State, Nigeria.

Table 2: t-test analysis of the significant difference between the mean ratings of the male and female custodial inmates on the extent to which non-formal education programmes have enhanced their social well-being in Katsina State, Nigeria.

 

Male = 266, Female = 85

S/N

Item Statement

Gender

SD

t-cal

Df

Sig

Dec

 

1

Inmates’ skills acquisition through non-formal education programmes has influenced changing of their behaviour for better.

Male

Female

3.14

3.12

0.71

0.73

0.24

349

0.81

NS

2

Inmates’ skills acquisition through non-formal education programmes has empowered them to keep away from violence within and outside the custodial centre.

Male

Female

2.90

2.81

0.82

0.81

0.85

349

0.40

NS

3

Inmates’ skills acquisition through non-formal education programmes has empowered them to acquire communal spirit of helping each other.

Male

Female

2.65

2.69

0.80

0.86

-0.41

349

0.68

NS

4

Inmates’ skills acquisition through non-formal education programmes has contributed in reducing the rate of social vices in the society by empowering them to become self-reliance within and outside the custodial centre.

Male

Female

2.73

2.91

0.80

0.77

-1.82

349

0.07

NS

5

Inmates’ skills acquisition through non-formal education programmes has empowered them to keep away from unlawful assembly that may lead them to get involved in riot or jail break.

Male

Female

2.77

3.00

0.82

0.82

-2.25

349

0.25

NS

6

Inmates’ skills acquisition through non-formal education programmes has empowered them to have the means of settling debt charges against them.

Male

Female

2.76

2.86

0.81

0.94

-0.98

349

0.33

NS

7

Inmates’ skills acquisition through non-formal education programmes has empowered them to keep away from drug abuse act in discharge.

Male

Female

2.70

2.75

0.95

0.86

-0.43

349

0.67

NS

8

Inmates’ skills acquisition through non-formal education programmes has empowered them to continue to take care of their family during and after their jail term.

Male

Female

2.76

2.84

0.86

0.84

-0.75

349

0.46

NS

 

Grand Mean and Standard Deviation

Male

Female

2.80

2.87

0.37

0.35

-1.59

349

0.11

NS

Key: N = Number of respondents,  = mean, SD = Standard Deviation, Dec. = Decision, NS = No Significant differences and S = Significant differences.

Result in Table 4 reveals that the t-values of 0.24, 0.85, -0.41, -1.82, -2.25, -0.98, -0.43, -0.75 and -1.59 with associated probabilities of 0.81, 0.40, 0.68, 0.07, 0.25, 0.33, 0.67 and 0.46 respectively were obtained. Items 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8 show that there was no significant difference between the mean ratings of the male and female custodial inmates on the extent to which non-formal education programmes have enhanced their social well-being in Katsina State, Nigeria, because their probability values were greater than 0.05 level of significance. The overall cluster t-value of -1.59 with a degree of freedom of 349 and a probability value of 0.11 was also obtained. This means that the null hypothesis which stated that there is no significant difference between the mean ratings of the male and female custodial inmates on the extent to which non-formal education programmes have enhanced their social well-being in Katsina State, Nigeria is accepted. Inference drawn therefore is that non-formal education programmes has enhanced social well-being of the inmates in Katsina State, Nigeria.

           

Research Question Two:

What are the challenges facing non-formal education programmes for enhancing social well-being of custodial inmates in Katsina State, Nigeria?

Table 3: Mean and Standard Deviations of the respondents on the challenges facing non-formal education programmes for enhancing their social well-being in Katsina State, Nigeria.

N = 351

S/No

Item

 

S D

Dec.

1

Inadequate support from governmental agencies in the implementation of non-formal education programmes for enhancing social well-being of inmates.

 

3.21

0.70

A

2

Inadequate non-governmental agencies’ support in the implementation of the non-formal education programmes for enhancing social well-being of inmates. .

 

3.27

0.66

A

3

Lack of inmates’will to participate in the non-formal education programmes for their social well-being.

 

2.36

0.99

A

4

Inadequate market for disposing the inmates’ trade produces within and outside the custodial centre.

 

2.92

0.84

A

5

In efficient management in the implementation of non-formal education programmes for enhancing social well-being of inmates in the custodial centre.

 

3.00

0.71

A

6

Inadequate instructional material for training of inmates to acquire education for their social well-being.

 

3.15

0.71

A

7

Inadequate teaching and learning environment in the custodial centre for training of inmates to acquire education for their social well-being.

 

3.32

0.68

A

8

Inadequate trained adult educators to disseminate relevant knowledge to inmates for enhancing their social well-being in the custodial centre.

 

3.32

0.67

A

 

Grand Mean and Standard Deviation

 

3.07

0.34

A

Key: N = Number of respondents; A=Agreed;  = mean; SD = Standard Deviation and Dec. = Decision.

The result of the study as presented in Table 3, shows that items 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8 had mean ratings of 3.21, 3.27, 3.36, 2.92, 3.00, 3.15, 3.32 and 3.32 with standard deviations of 0.70, 0.66, 0.99, 0.84, 0.71, 0.71, 0.68 and 0.67 respectively. This indicates that respondents agree that there are challenges affecting the VSA programmes for enhancing their social well-being in Katsina State, Nigeria. This is because the mean values of the items are within the real limit of 2.50 -3.49 for decision making. The cluster mean of 3.07 with a standard deviation of 0.34 showed that all the items in Table 3 are the challenges affecting the VSA programmes for enhancing social well-being of inmates in the study area.

Discussion of the Results

Finding from the research question one of this study reveals that the respondents unanimously accept to a high extent that NFE programmes have enhanced their social well-being to a high extent in the study area. This result agrees with Agbakwuru and Godfrey (2016) who confirmed that educational programmes in some Nigeria Correctional Custodial Centres influence inmates’ psychological and social well-being. The result of this present study also agrees with Hassan and Oloyede (2013) who noted that inmates that received educational training while in the custody mostly become socially rehabilitated thereby enhancing their social well-being during and after their jail terms.

The first hypothesis (H01) centred on finding out if there was no significant difference between the mean ratings of the male and female inmates on the extent to which the NFE programmes enhanced social well- being of inmates in Katsina State, Nigeria. The result shows that the respondents accept unanimously that there was significant difference in the mean responses of the male and female inmates on the extent to which NFE programmes enhanced their social well-being in Katsina State.

This is in agreement with Abba and Mbagwu (2016) who noted that there was significant difference in the mean responses of the male and female inmates on the extent to which VSA programmes enhanced their socio-economic well-being.

From the result of the research question two for this study, the respondents unanimously agreed that there are challenges facing NFE programmes for enhancing social well-being of inmates in Katsina State, Nigeria.

This finding is in line with Asokhia (2013) who noted that there are inadequate modern workshop and equipment for rehabilitation of inmates in most Nigerian prisons. It is also in agreement with Agbakwuru and Godfrey (2013) who revealed that most of the Nigerian prisons had very limited facilities for rehabilitation of inmates. The finding also agrees with Onweonye, Obinne and Odu (2013) who reported that there are inadequate educational programmes for the rehabilitation of inmates in some Nigeria Correctional Custodial Centres.

Conclusion

The study looks at how non-formal education programmes enhanced social well-being of inmates in Katsina State, Nigeria. The challenges affecting the NFE programmes for the rehabilitation of inmates in the study area were also examined. This study concludes that if inmates are empowered through NFE programmes, their social well-being will be adequately enhanced. Therefore, if more educational programmes are introduced and also extended to awaiting trial custodial centres in the study area, more access to education will be given to inmates and be encouraged to participate and acquire knowledge through NFE programmes. The knowledge acquired through NFE programmes may enable them to re-enter society as educated and self-reliant citizens.

Recommendations

Based on these findings, the researchers made the following recommendations that:

(1) More qualified adult educators / instructors of various educational programmes should be recruited into Nigeria Correctional Service (NCS) for the training of inmates in other custodial centres of the State;

(2) The NCS should introduce formal education programmes and more NFE programmes that are not available in the study area.

(3) Adequate teaching and learning environment and instructional materials should be provided for the implementation of NFE programmes in the state.

(4) The law and provisions that govern the treatment of offenders should also be reviewed, especially the one that takes care of educational programmes for inmates, which only approve educational training for convicted inmates. Hence, the awaiting trial inmates and other convicted inmtes in the satellite’s custodial centres will be engaged to participate in the programmes so as to enhance their social well-being in the state and the country at large;

References

Abba, M. & Mbagwu, F. O. (2016).Vocational skills training needs of prison inmates for economic growth in Katsina State, Nigeria. Nigeria: journal of the Nigeria National Council for Adult Education (NNCAE, 14 (1), 387-405.

Asokhia, M.O. & Agbonluae, O.O. (2013). Assessment of rehabilitation services in Nigeria prisons in Edo State, Nigeria: American Journal of Contemporary Research, 3(1), 140-152.

Agbakwuru, C. & Godfrey, E. M. I. (2016). Incarceration and the well-being of prison inmates in Nigeria: European Centre for Research, Training and Development. UK

Federal Republic of Nigeria (2019). Nigeria Correctional Service Act, Abuja: National Assembly, July, 2019.

Hassan, M.A, & Oloyede, T.O. (2013). Evaluation of component of adult education on the inmates welfare in Agodi Prison Yard, Ibadan, Oyo States, Nigeria: International Journal of correctional education.

Igbo, E.U.M. (2007). Introduction to criminology. Nsukka: University of Nigeria Press Ltd.

Masari, A. B. (2015). Id-el Kabir Sallah Address speech delivered to the people of Katsina State at the Sallah homage of the Emir of Katsina to the Executive Governor of Katsina State. Katsina: Government Printing Press.

Nworgwu, B. G. (2015). Educational research, basic issues and methodology (Second and Enlarged Edition): University Trust Publishers, Nsukka, Enugu State, Nigeria.

Ngwu, P. N. C. (2016). 105th Inaugural Lecture of the University of Nigeria, Nsukka delivered on Thursday, March 31, 2016.

Obiozor, W. E. & Obidiegwu, U. J. (2013).Globalisation of adult education: theories and strategies for instructors. Awka, Nigeria: One street Consulting

Omoni, G. E. & Ijeh, S.U (2009). Qualitative Education for Prisoners: A Panacea to Effective rehabilitation and Integration into the society: Edo Journal of Counselling 2 (1), 28– 37.

Onweonye, C, Obinne, J.I., &Odu, K.O. (2013).Vocational Training Needs of Prison inmates in Delta State for Self-reliance.The Global journal of Educational perspectives: The African Education and Business Research Institute, Inc. 1 (1).

Talba, A. M. (2015). Remembering the inmates of Kaduna Prison. Daily Trust Newspapers Report, April, 22. Retrieved August, 2015 from

http://www.dailytrust.com.ng/daily/index.php/feature/52674

Tenibaije, D., J. (2010). Counselling for productive employment of prison inmate: European Journal of Educational Studies 2 (3) 193 – 202.

Ugwuoke, C. U. &Ameh, S.O. (2014). Rehabilitation of Convicts in Nigerian Prisons: A Study of Federal Prisons in Kogi State:Journal of Research on Humanities and Social Sciences(online) 4(26): 33-43.

Degel Journal

The official website of the DEGEL Jounal is https://www.degeljournal.com

Post a Comment

0 Comments