Ad Code

Hazards of Journalism Practice in Nigeria: A Study of Journalists in Abuja

Cite this article as: Adekunle G.M., Fatahi H.O & Agiliga O.P. (2025). Hazards of Journalism Practice in Nigeria: A Study of Journalists in Abuja. Zamfara International Journal of Humanities,3(3), 46-54.www.doi.org/10.36349/zamijoh.2025.v03i03.006

HAZARDS OF JOURNALISM PRACTICE IN NIGERIA: A STUDY OF JOURNALISTS IN ABUJA

Ganiyu, Mutiu Adekunle (Ph.D)
Department of Mass Communication
National Open University of Nigeria, Abuja

And

Hamzat, Owolabi Fatahi
Department of Mass Communication
National Open University of Nigeria, Abuja

And

Okeikwue Paul Agiliga
Department of Mass Communication
National Open University of Nigeria, Abuja

Abstract: This study examined the hazards facing journalists in Nigeria with a special focus on journalists practicing in the Federal Capital Territory, Abuja, Nigeria. The study employed the survey research design. 300 copies of questionnaire were administered to journalists in Abuja to elicit information on their experiences of hazards, perceptions of safety, and strategies for mitigating the risks. The study was anchored on the Social Learning Theory and Social Cognitive Theory. The findings reveal a range of hazards faced by journalists in Abuja, including physical threats, online harassment, legal challenges, economic instability, and political interference. These hazards have significant implications for journalists' safety, well-being, and professional autonomy, leading to self-censorship, psychological stress, reduced productivity, and limitations on career prospects. However, journalists employ various strategies to mitigate hazards, including adherence to ethical standards, safety training, and collaboration with support networks. Based on the findings, the researchers recommended the strengthening of legal protections, improved safety training, establishment of active support networks, promotion of ethical journalism, encouragement of dialogue between stakeholders among others.

Keywords: Hazards, Journalistic practices, Reporting, Professionalism, Ethical journalism version

Introduction

Journalism plays a crucial role in the development of Nigeria's society. It serves as a vital pillar for transparency, accountability, education, mobilisation and the free flow of information. It provides a platform for citizens to be informed, express their opinions, and hold the government and other powerful entities accountable (Nwokeocha, 2023). However, the Nigerian media landscape faces several challenges that hinder the full realization of press freedom and the rights of journalists (Akinwale, 2011 & Ganiyu, 2013). In a democratic society, journalists have the right to freedom of expression and the press, as guaranteed by international human rights instruments such as the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (Oluwatayo, 2022). These rights allow journalists to investigate, report, and express their opinions without censorship or fear of reprisals.

However, journalists in Nigeria face a range of work hazard, which significantly impede their ability to carry out their work independently and without fear (Onuoha, Talabi, Ayodeji, et al., 2021). Some key aspects of work hazard faced by journalists in Nigeria include violence from state actors and non-state actors, intimidation through legal means, online harassment and cyberbullying, job insecurity, etc. To Matthew and Onyemaobi (2020), Nwokeocha, (2023) and Frère (2014), journalists in Nigeria often face violence and intimidation from state actors, including law enforcement agencies, military personnel, government officials and non-state actors (armed groups, political thugs, and individuals with vested interests).

The harassments can be a physical assault, harassment, arbitrary arrests, and even torture. Such actions are aimed at silencing critical voices and suppressing information that challenges those in power. These attacks are often motivated by efforts to control media narratives, suppress investigative reporting, or prevent the exposure of corruption and wrongdoing. Journalists in Nigeria may face legal harassment and intimidation, including baseless lawsuits, defamation claims, or charges under restrictive laws (Oyewole, 2021). These actions are sometimes used as tools to silence journalists, drain their resources, and deter them from pursuing critical reporting.

Online harassment and cyberbullying are another form of hazard in journalism (The Guardian, 2019).

With the rise of digital media, Nigerian journalists are increasingly subjected to online harassment, cyberbullying, and threats through social media platforms and online forums. Trolls and anonymous individuals target journalists with abusive language, threats of violence, and character assassination, aiming to undermine their credibility and discourage their work (Onuoha et al., 2021). Journalists in Nigeria often face economic pressures and job insecurity, which can be used as tools of intimidation. Media organizations sometimes withhold salaries or terminate contracts as a means to control editorial content or discourage investigative reporting on sensitive issues (Frère, 2014).

Statement of the Problem

Despite the fact that journalism in Nigeria plays a critical role in the development of the country, yet journalists face numerous hazards and challenges that hinder their ability to operate freely. Although, Nigerian democracy guarantee freedom of speech and accountability, yet, courageous journalists’ pursuit of truth and justice is often fraught with risks. Journalists in Nigeria navigate a minefield of dangers, from physical attacks and intimidation to harassment and censorship. Investigative reporters, investigating corruption and injustice, face the specter of violence, or even silencing through disappearance (Oluwatayo, 2022).

The advancement of digital communication technologies, once heralded as a haven of free expression, now harbors its own danger, with online threats, cyberbullying, and digital manipulation aimed at silencing journalists (Maares & Hanusch, 2020). This creates atmosphere of fear and insecurity and jeopardizes the personal well-being of journalists. It also affects the flow of vital information, leaving the public vulnerable to misinformation and manipulation.

Furthermore, the legal landscape often fails to offer adequate protection. Inadequate legislation and weak enforcement mechanisms leave journalists exposed to unnecessary arrests, detentions, and legal harassment. This lack of accountability creates a breeding ground for impunity, encouraging those who seek to silence journalists and obstruct the pursuit of truth (Oluwatayo, 2022).

To safeguard the rights of journalists and engender a truly independent media landscape, a comprehensive study is essential. Limited research has been conducted on the hazard of journalism practice in Nigeria. However, since journalistic practice is expanding, it is necessary to examine the hazard of journalism practice in Abuja which is the Capital Territory where prominent and powerful individuals reside including media owners, politicians, business owners, headquarters of ministries and government agencies, etc.

Objectives of the Study

The objectives of the study were to:

1. Examine the hazards being faced by journalists in Abuja.

2. Identify ways the hazards can be reduced as suggested by the journalists in Abuja.

Research Questions

1.      What are the hazards being faced by journalists in Abuja?

2.      What are the ways the hazards can be reduced as suggested by the journalists in Abuja?

An Overview of Physical Assaults on Journalists in Nigeria

Physical assaults on journalists in Nigeria have been a significant concern and pose a serious threat to press freedom and the safety of media professionals. Journalists in Nigeria have faced various forms of physical attacks while carrying out their duties, often targeted by individuals or groups with vested interests in suppressing information or silencing critical voices (Abdulhameed, 2014).

Between 2015 and 2023, journalists in Nigeria and globally have faced significant hazards and challenges in their line of work. According to the Committee to Protect Journalists (CPJ), Nigeria is the deadliest country for Journalists in Africa in 2020. At least four journalists lost their lives.

In addition to fatalities, 34 journalists in Nigeria were victims of assaults. This includes both male and female journalists who faced physical harm while carrying out their reporting duties (Abbas, 2020). Meanwhile, the relationship between the media and the Nigerian government is often tense. Instances of harassment, arrest, and prosecution occur when journalists report on issues such as corruption and terrorism. The government’s attempts to influence the media have led to a preference for independently owned news brands that are perceived to be free of political control (Isaac & Roper, 2021).

During the pandemic, journalists worldwide faced challenges. In Nigeria, some states required approval from state taskforces before publishing stories related to COVID-19. Journalists were also assaulted and had their equipment seized while covering pandemic-related news (Isaac & Roper, 2021). World Press Freedom Index (2021) ranks Nigeria 120 out of 180 countries in terms of press freedom. Journalists continue to encounter harassment, arrest, and prosecution when reporting on sensitive topics (Mustapha-Koiki, 2019).

Theoretical Framework

Social Cognitive Theory: Social Cognitive Theory, developed by psychologist Albert Bandura, is a theoretical framework that explores how individuals learn, develop, and modify their behaviors through the interaction between cognitive processes, social influences, and environmental factors (Firmansyah & Saepuloh, 2022). It emphasizes the role of observation, modeling, and self-efficacy in shaping human behavior (Vinney, 2019). The theory suggests that people learn not only through direct experience but also by observing others and the consequences of their actions (Govindaraju, 2021).

In the context of this study, the Social Cognitive Theory can be applied to understand how journalists perceive and respond to work-related hazards in Abuja. It provides an insight to explore the cognitive, behavioral, and environmental factors that shape journalists' perceptions of work-related hazards. In the context of journalism practice in Nigeria, Social Learning Theory is relevant to understanding how journalists navigate and respond to hazards in their profession. Journalists often observe and learn from their peers, mentors, and role models within the industry. They may emulate the strategies, coping mechanisms, and ethical principles demonstrated by experienced journalists to navigate challenging situations.

Furthermore, the theory highlights the influence of external factors, such as societal norms, institutional structures, and media representations, on journalists' perceptions and behaviors. Additionally, it underscores the importance of reinforcement in shaping journalists' responses to hazards. Positive reinforcement, such as recognition for courageous reporting, may encourage journalists to confront risks and uphold journalistic integrity. Conversely, negative reinforcement, such as threats or punishment for critical reporting, may deter journalists from engaging in investigative journalism or speaking truth to power.

Methodology

The researchers employed survey research design. The study's population consisted of journalists (print, broadcast and online media) in Abuja. 300 journalists were purposively selected for this study. 300 copies of questionnaire were distributed to the journalists in their offices, venues of programmes, the press centres and other places. Abuja is a significant city in Nigeria, known for its cultural heritage, peace, concentration of government and non-government institutions, and bustling economic, political, social activities. Thus, it has a high concentration of media outfits.

To ensure the validity and reliability of the questionnaire, a pilot study was conducted by the researchers on 30 respondents. Comments made by the pilot study’s respondents were used to improve on the questionnaire administered on 300 respondents. The data gotten were presented in simple percentages in tables.

Results

This section presents and analyses data obtained from the respondents. Out of 300 copies of questionnaire administered, only 250 were valid filled and returned to the researchers.


Table 1: Most causes of hazards in journalism

Response

Frequency

Percentage

Physical threat

29

11.6

Online threat

52

20.8

Legal challenges

95

38

Economy instability

26

10.4

Gender and minority discrimination

16

6.4

Unprofessional media environment

32

12.8

Total

250

100%


Table 1 presents responses from 250 participants, categorising the causes of hazards into different categories. Legal challenges emerge as the most commonly cited cause of hazards in journalism, with 95 respondents, constituting approximately 38% of the total, identifying them as a significant factor. This finding underscores the complex legal landscape within which journalists operate in Nigeria, where laws related to defamation, sedition, and national security can be used to silence or intimidate journalists and restrict press freedom.

Online threats also feature prominently as a cause of hazards in journalism, with 52 respondents (about 20.8% of the total) identifying them as a major concern. This highlights the growing importance of digital safety and cybersecurity for journalists, who increasingly face risks such as cyberbullying, online harassment, or targeted attacks on social media platforms. Unprofessional media environment is identified by 32 respondents (approximately 12.8% of the total) as a cause of hazards in journalism. This suggests that factors such as sensationalism, lack of ethical standards, or compromised editorial independence within media organizations can contribute to hazards and risks for journalists.

Other factors cited as causes of hazards in journalism include physical threats (29 respondents, 11.6%), economy instability (26 respondents, 10.4%), and gender and minority discrimination (16 respondents, 6.4%). While these factors have lower frequencies, they nevertheless represent significant challenges and risks faced by journalists in Abuja. Overall, the data from Table 7 highlight the multifaceted nature of hazards in journalism, encompassing legal, digital, professional, economic, and social dimensions.

Table 2: Physical threat is most common in Abuja

Response

Frequency

Percentage

Violence and intimidation to silence journalists

97

38.8

Kidnapping

2

0.8

Killing

0

0

Harassment from security agents

157

62.8

Total

250

100%

 

Table 2 presents responses from 250 participants, categorizing the types of physical threats encountered by journalists. Harassment from security agents emerges as the most common physical threat, with 157 respondents, constituting approximately 62.8% of the total, identifying it as a prevalent issue. This finding underscores the challenges journalists face while reporting on security-related issues or engaging with law enforcement agencies, where harassment or intimidation from security agents can impede their ability to perform their journalistic duties.

Violence and intimidation to silence journalists is also identified as a significant physical threat, with 97 respondents (about 38.8% of the total) reporting experiences of violence or intimidation aimed at silencing their voices or suppressing critical reporting. This highlights the risks journalists encounter while covering sensitive topics or exposing wrongdoing, where they may face physical attacks or threats from individuals seeking to silence them. Kidnapping and killing are not reported as common physical threats among the respondents, with only 2 participants (approximately 0.8% of the total) reporting experiences of kidnapping and none reporting experiences of killing. While these forms of violence are relatively rare, they nevertheless represent extreme risks and vulnerabilities for journalists operating in high-risk environments.

Overall, the data from Table 8 underscore the diverse range of physical threats faced by journalists in Abuja, including harassment from security agents and violence aimed at silencing journalists.

Table 3: Online threat that is most common in Abuja

Response

     Frequency

   Percentage (%)

Discredit journalists through misinformation

       80

       32

Cyber-attacks

        52

      20.8

Online trolling and harassment

       66

     26.4

Hacking social handles

       52

     20.8

Total

       250

     100%

 

Table 3 presents responses from 250 participants, categorizing different types of online threats and their prevalence. Discrediting journalists through misinformation emerges as the most common online threat experienced by journalists in Abuja, with 80 respondents (approximately 32% of the total) reporting instances of such incidents. This finding underscores the prevalence of disinformation campaigns aimed at undermining journalists' credibility and spreading false or misleading information to discredit their work.

Online trolling and harassment are also prevalent, with 66 respondents (about 26.4% of the total) reporting experiences of online abuse or harassment. This highlights the pervasive nature of online harassment, where journalists may face insults, threats, or derogatory comments targeting them personally or professionally. Cyber-attacks and hacking social handles are reported by a similar number of respondents, with 52 participants (approximately 20.8% of the total) identifying each of these as common online threats. This suggests that journalists in Abuja may encounter risks such as phishing attacks, malware infections, or unauthorized access to their social media accounts, posing threats to their digital security and privacy.

Overall, the data from Table 3 highlight the diverse range of online threats faced by journalists in Abuja, including disinformation campaigns, online harassment, cyber-attacks, and social media hacking.

Discussion of Findings

Table 1 revealed that the hazards facing journalists in Abuja are multifaceted and encompass various threats, challenges, and risks that impact their safety, well-being, and ability to perform their professional duties effectively. Based on the data interpretations provided by the respondents, several key hazards can be identified:

Physical Threats: The data reveal that physical threats, including violence, intimidation, and harassment, are prevalent among journalists in Abuja. Respondents reported experiences of physical harm, verbal insults, and even threats to their lives while carrying out their journalistic duties.

Online Threats: Journalists in Abuja also face significant online threats, such as cyber-attacks, online trolling, and harassment. The data indicate instances of journalists being targeted through misinformation campaigns, hacking of social media accounts, and other forms of digital intimidation.

Legal Challenges: Legal harassment poses a significant hazard to journalists in Abuja, with respondents citing restrictive laws, misuse of judicial processes, and weak press freedom protections as key concerns. These legal challenges can be used to silence dissent, censor critical reporting, or target journalists for their work.

Economic Instability: Economic factors contribute to hazards in journalism, including low wages, dependence on advertising revenue, and poor working conditions. These economic pressures can impact journalists' financial security, job stability, and editorial independence, making them more vulnerable to external pressures or influence.

Political Interference: Political interference emerges as a hazard, with respondents identifying politicians and government officers as major sources of threats to journalists in Abuja. This underscores the challenges journalists face while holding power accountable and reporting on sensitive political issues.

Relating these findings to existing research, studies on press freedom and media safety in Nigeria have highlighted similar hazards facing journalists across the country. For example, research conducted by international organizations such as Reporters Without Borders and the Committee to Protect Journalists has documented cases of physical attacks, legal harassment, and online threats targeting journalists in Nigeria, including in the capital city of Abuja.

Furthermore, academic studies examining the media landscape in Nigeria have identified structural challenges such as weak legal protections, political interference, and economic constraints as underlying factors contributing to hazards in journalism. These findings align with the data interpretations presented here, providing additional context and validation to the hazards facing journalists in Abuja.

Overall, the data interpretations presented by the respondents underscore the complex and interconnected nature of hazards in journalism in Abuja, highlighting the need for comprehensive strategies to protect journalists' safety, uphold press freedom, and promote a conducive environment for independent and fearless journalism in Nigeria.

Table II revealed causes of hazards in journalism practice in Nigeria, as evidenced by the data interpretations provided by the respondents, can be attributed to various factors:

Legal Challenges: Respondents highlighted restrictive laws, misuse of judicial processes, and weak press freedom protections as significant causes of hazards in journalism. These legal challenges create a hostile environment for journalists, where laws and regulations can be exploited to censor dissent, silence critical reporting, or target journalists for prosecution.

Online Threats: The prevalence of online threats, including cyber-attacks, online trolling, and misinformation campaigns, poses a significant hazard to journalists in Nigeria. The data indicate instances of journalists being targeted through digital platforms, where they face harassment, intimidation, and attacks on their credibility and reputation.

Economic Instability: Economic factors contribute to hazards in journalism, including low wages, dependence on advertising revenue, and poor working conditions. These economic pressures can compromise journalists' financial security, editorial independence, and professional autonomy, making them more susceptible to external influences or pressures

Political Interference: Political interference emerges as a major cause of hazards in journalism, with respondents identifying politicians, government officers, and law enforcement agents as primary sources of threats. This underscores the challenges journalists face while reporting on sensitive political issues, holding power accountable, and advocating for transparency and accountability in governance.

Relating these findings to existing research on journalism practice in Nigeria, studies have consistently highlighted similar causes of hazards facing journalists across the country. Research conducted by international organizations, human rights groups, and academic institutions has documented the impact of legal restrictions, online harassment, economic constraints, and political interference on press freedom and media safety in Nigeria.

Furthermore, academic studies examining the media landscape in Nigeria have underscored the interconnectedness of these factors, emphasizing how legal, economic, and political dynamics shape the hazards faced by journalists in their professional practice. These findings corroborate the data interpretations presented by the respondents, providing additional evidence and context to the causes of hazards in journalism practice in Nigeria.

Overall, the data interpretations and existing research highlight the complex and multifaceted nature of hazards in journalism in Nigeria, underscoring the need for concerted efforts to address legal, economic, and political challenges, protect journalists' safety, and uphold press freedom and democratic principles in the country.

Does work hazards influenced journalists’ performance in Abuja?

Based on the data interpretations provided by the respondents, work hazards indeed influence journalists' performance in Abuja. Several key findings suggest that hazards impact various aspects of journalists' professional duties and well-being:

Self-Censorship: A significant majority of respondents agreed or strongly agreed that hazards lead to self-censorship among journalists in Abuja. This indicates that journalists may refrain from reporting on certain topics or expressing certain viewpoints due to concerns about threats, intimidation, or backlash.

Psychological Stress: The data reveal high levels of agreement among respondents regarding the impact of hazards on psychological stress. Journalists in Abuja reported experiencing anxiety, burnout, and trauma resulting from threats, violence, or harassment encountered in their work.

Physical Harm and Displacement: A notable proportion of respondents acknowledged the impact of hazards on physical harm and displacement. Journalists reported instances of violence, intimidation, or forced relocation due to threats or attacks encountered while reporting in Abuja.

Reduced Productivity: Respondents indicated that hazards negatively affect journalists' productivity, with many agreeing or strongly agreeing that hazards impede their ability to work effectively, meet deadlines, or pursue investigative stories.

Reduced Career Prospects: The data suggest that hazards also influence journalists' career prospects, with respondents reporting concerns about job security, professional advancement, and opportunities for career growth within the media industry.

Relating these findings to existing research on journalism practice, studies have consistently documented the adverse effects of hazards on journalists' performance and well-being. Research conducted in Nigeria and other countries has highlighted how threats, violence, legal harassment, and online attacks can undermine journalists' ability to report freely, uphold professional standards, and fulfill their democratic role as watchdogs and informers.

Furthermore, academic studies examining the impact of work hazards on journalists' mental health, job satisfaction, and career trajectories have underscored the long-term consequences of exposure to hazards in journalism. These findings align with the data interpretations presented by the respondents, providing additional evidence and context to the influence of work hazards on journalists' performance in Abuja and beyond.

Overall, the data interpretations and existing research emphasize the need for comprehensive strategies to address work hazards, protect journalists' safety, and uphold press freedom and democratic principles in Nigeria.

Conclusion and Recommendations

The focus of this study was to shed light on the hazards facing journalists in Abuja, Nigeria. The data interpretations have revealed a complex landscape where journalists navigate physical threats, online harassment, legal challenges, economic instability, and political interference in their pursuit of truth and accountability. These hazards not only jeopardize the safety and well-being of journalists but also undermine the fundamental principles of democracy and freedom of expression. They create a scary effect, leading to self-censorship, psychological stress, reduced productivity, and limitations on career prospects for journalists in Abuja.

Arising from the above, the researchers recommend the following:

i.          Enhance Safety Training: Providing comprehensive safety training programs for journalists in Abuja, covering risk assessment, conflict management, digital security, first aid, and trauma support, to equip them with the necessary skills and knowledge to mitigate hazards effectively.

ii.        Establish Support Networks: Fostering collaboration among media organizations, civil society groups, legal experts, and international partners to establish support networks and emergency response mechanisms for journalists facing threats or attacks in Abuja.

iii.     Promote Ethical Journalism: Encouraging adherence to ethical standards and professional integrity among journalists in Abuja through awareness campaigns, capacity-building initiatives, and peer-to-peer mentorship programs, to uphold the credibility and trustworthiness of journalism.

All media associations within and outside Nigeria and others should be actively involved in the promotion of ethics and professionalism.

iv.     Enhance Media Literacy: Stakeholders should promote media literacy initiatives among the public in Abuja. This is to raise awareness of the importance of press freedom and roles of journalists in a democratic society, guide against misinformation and censorship and foster a supportive environment for independent journalism.

v.        Combat Impunity: Law enforcement agents, judiciary and other stakeholders should ensure accountability for crimes committed against journalists by investigating and prosecuting perpetrators of violence to deter future incidents and uphold the rule of law.

References

1.      Abbas, A. (2020, November 1). Nigeria: Crackdown on journalists suffocates press freedom. ARTICLE 19. Retrieved from https://www.article19.org/resources/nigeria-crackdown-on-journalists/ on July 12, 2024.

2.      Abdulhameed, A. U. (2014, June 23). Journalists and professional hazard. Retrieved from Blueprint. Retrieved from https://www.blueprint.ng/journalists-and-professional-hazard/ June 22, 2023.

3.      Akinwale, A. (2011). Repression of Press Freedom in Nigerian Democratic Dispensations. Africa Development, 35(3).

4.      Firmansyah, D., & Saepuloh, D. (2022). Social Learning Theory: Cognitive and Behavioral Approaches. Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Holistik (JIPH), 1(3), 297–324. https://doi.org/10.55927/jiph.v1i3.2317

5.      Frère, M.-S. (2014). Journalist in Africa: A high-risk profession under threat. Journal of African Media Studies, 6(2), 181–198.

6.      Govindaraju, V. (2021). Multicultural Education A Review of Social Cognitive Theory from The Perspective of Interpersonal Communication. Multicultural Education, 7 (12), 2021.

7.      Isaac, A., & Roper, C. (2021). Journalism in Nigeria. Retrieved from https://reutersinstitute.politics.ox.ac.uk/digital-news-report/2021/nigeria on June 21, 2024.

8.      Maares, P., & Hanusch, F. (2020). Interpretations of the journalistic field: A systematic analysis of how journalism scholarship appropriates Bourdieusian thought. Journalism.

9.      Matthews, J., & Onyemaobi, K. (2020). Precarious Professionalism: Journalism and the Fragility of Professional Practice in the Global South. Journalism Studies, 21(13), 1836–1851.

10.  Mustapha-Koiki, A. R. (2019). Journalism and risk: the impact of Boko Haram attacks on news content and journalists’ patterns of news gathering and reporting in Nigeria (2011-2012). Retrieved from https://ir.canterbury.ac.nz/items/e on January 12, 2024.

11.  Nwokeocha, I. (2023). Influence of Media Staff Welfare on Effective Journalism Practice in Nigeria. Jurnal Multidisiplin Madani, 3(4), 853–856.

12.  Oluwatayo, A. (2022, January 25). Full List of TV Stations in Nigeria by States. Retrieved from https://www.owogram.com/list-tv-stations-nigeria/ on July 10, 2023.

13.  Onuoha, C.-B., Tunca, E. A., Talabi, F. O., Ayodeji, A. B., Oluwole, A. V., & Gever, V. C. (2021). Modeling journalists’ coping strategies to occupational hazards in their coverage of protests against police brutality (ENDSARS protests) in Nigeria. International Journal of Occupational Safety and Ergonomics, 1–24. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1080/10803548.2021.1999651 on July 11, 2024.

14.  Oyewole, R. (2021, October 12). Journalism practice in Nigeria is frustrating amid poor remuneration, government regulations. The Guardian. Retrieved from https://guardian.ng/features/journalism-practice-in-nigeria-is-frustrating-amid-poor-remuneration-government-regulations/ on June 19, 2024.

15.  Vinney, C. (2019, January 20). Social Cognitive Theory: How We Learn from the Behavior of others. Retrieved from https://www.thoughtco.com/social-cognitive-theory- on July 12, 2024.

Hazards of Journalism Practice in Nigeria: A Study of Journalists in Abuja

Post a Comment

0 Comments